Rothstein on Campus Today | The Boneyard

Rothstein on Campus Today

Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,596
Reaction Score
95,386
Hawkins is going to have to start and it's going to have to happen fairly early in the season. You can't have Martin and Jackson starting together at the 2 and 3.


Yeah that's ridiculous. That is an awful shooting lineup and Martin can't play the 2. If Andre of Rese learned how to shoot maybe you put Andre at the 2. More likely Gaff at the 2 to start the season and Hawkins in waiting.

Andre and Martin are battling for the starting 3 spot unless either can perform better at the 4 than Whaley or Akok... which seems unlikely
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,596
Reaction Score
95,386


REMEMBER THE NAME


We need to press a heck of a lot more than we have before with this depth and speed. Make up for the shooting weakness

The rotation will need to he down to 9 or 10 by the middle of the season. My guess is Springs might be on the outside looking in and probably Samson getting the cleanup minutes when Sanogo or Whaley aren't at the 5... maybe some 4 mimutes if we go big. Probably 1 of Gaff or Sool too.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 15, 2019
Messages
1,253
Reaction Score
3,327
My current thought is if we need a deuce, its a play for Sanogo. If we need a three it’s going to be RJ, Akok, or one of the new guys.
So you're of the thought that we'll go to Samson before Tyler if we need a 3???
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,330
Reaction Score
46,567
Tyler Polley is going to become a SF this year. With Akok, Johnson, Sanogo and Whaley, the C-PF spots are locked down.

Polley-Martin-Jackson-Hawkins-Gaffney battling for time at SG and SF.

Cole and Diggins at PG.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2019
Messages
2,859
Reaction Score
12,223
My current thought is if we need a deuce, its a play for Sanogo. If we need a three it’s going to be RJ, Akok, or one of the new guys.
Why would we look to the 6th best 3-point shooter on the team when we need a three?
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2019
Messages
2,859
Reaction Score
12,223
I agree, but I am just thinking where DH will go. Thats why I added the new guys.
So you're saying you wouldn't expect Hurley to draw up a 3 for Polley or Gaffney unless Cole, Hawkins, Diggins, Akok and Johnson were unavailable?
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,414
Reaction Score
66,015
Hawkins is going to have to start and it's going to have to happen fairly early in the season. You can't have Martin and Jackson starting together at the 2 and 3.

It's a monster defensive lineup though, and should be able to get out in transition after misses/turnovers and attack the offensive boards, mitigating some of the half court lack of spacing. Akok helps with spacing, too. If Jackson initiates an attack, then we can at least space with 3 of the 4 others (they'll likely respect Martin since he takes them, and can knock down a completely open 3).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,596
Reaction Score
95,386
Tyler Polley is going to become a SF this year. With Akok, Johnson, Sanogo and Whaley, the C-PF spots are locked down.

Polley-Martin-Jackson-Hawkins-Gaffney battling for time at SG and SF.

Cole and Diggins at PG.

None of Polley Martin or Jackson can play the 2. Maybe Jackson if his handle has improved a smidge. We have a major logjam at the 3.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
640
Reaction Score
1,105
None of Polley Martin or Jackson can play the 2. Maybe Jackson if his handle has improved a smidge. We have a major logjam at the 3.
Eh, I think that's a fairly rigid way of looking at things. At least in my mind there is not a significant difference between the 2 and 3. Positionless basketball has been en vogue for some time. To me, an ideal lineup has an initiator/ball handler, 3 versatile wings, and someone to shore up the paint/protect the rim.

I think the players mentioned above all bring different qualities to the wing position and should be able to be mixed and matched with each other. Up to Hurley to experiment with lineups to find what's optimal. He may have had some struggles with game planning around a limited roster last year, but I have full confidence in him
 
Last edited:

Huskyforlife

Akokbouk
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
12,103
Reaction Score
49,107
None of Polley Martin or Jackson can play the 2. Maybe Jackson if his handle has improved a smidge. We have a major logjam at the 3.
Martin had a quote recently about playing more guard this year. I think Hurley is going to try him at the 2 to start the year, but hopefully he adjusts quickly when it doesn't work.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
13,354
Reaction Score
89,221
Eh, I think that's a fairly rigid way of looking at things. At least in my mind there is not a significant difference between the 2 and 3. Positionless basketball has been en vogue for some time. To me, an ideal lineup has an initiator/ball handler, 3 versatile wings, and someone to shore up the paint/protect the rim.

I think the players mentioned above all bring different qualities to the wing position and should be able to be mixed and matched with each other. Up to Hurley to experiment with lineups to find what's optimal. He may have had some struggles with game planning around a limited roster last year, but I have filill confidence in him
You're right that the game as shifted towards positionless basketball and there's not a huge difference between 2-4, but I think you're approaching it from the wrong direction. Teams go positionless with 3 shooters interchangeable at the 2-4, not with three non-shooters at the 2-4. That's a much tougher lineup to make work
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
14,543
Reaction Score
80,456
I can hear him pronounce the word Palpable in that tweet
“Palpable buzz” is one of his go to phrases.

He didn’t predict the Final Four or National Championship contenders so I’m really worried now.
 

Online statistics

Members online
355
Guests online
4,177
Total visitors
4,532

Forum statistics

Threads
157,041
Messages
4,078,398
Members
9,973
Latest member
WillngtnOak


Top Bottom