MilfordHusky
Voice of Reason
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 38,320
- Reaction Score
- 135,048
After years with some lack of depth, I prefer a larger roster. We might see a transfer or two, though I doubt it. We may see a redshirt. We could have injuries. I like some "redundancy."Generally no more than 12. Usually 13 at most. Probably same as Muffet. Here's why:
UCONN potential starters - Collier (Pheesa), Samuelson, Stevens, Dangerfield, Walker
Lots of PT - Camara, Coombs
Developing players - Gordon, Espinosa, Collier (Charli)
Role players - Bent, Irwin
If you count possible Christyn Williams as a hopeful UCONN lean, she goes under the category of "developing players". I mean no disrespect to Bent and Irwin, but beginning next year, I just don't see how they earn any meaningful PT given that UCONN will be wanting to develop non-role players to see what their upside is. I don't see Bent or Irwin with the same upside as other posts Camara/Collier or guards Coombs, Gordon, and Espinosa. If you add in guard Williams and another post player, there's just not enough PT for everyone. And above is just with 12 players. At 13 or 14, it's incredibly cumbersome...
Personally I think a class size of 3-3-3-3 is about perfect.
Looking at next year and the following year together, we will have to replace Gabby and Kia in 2018-19. Who benefits from that? I see Megan replacing Kia and going from 16-18 minutes as a frosh to 24-26 minutes as a sophomore. I think that Azura and Batouly pick up Gabby's minutes.
Except for Megan, I think Geno brings the freshmen along slowly, as they are not needed much next season. But they will have their opportunity a year or two later. An interesting question relates to Molly and Kyla vs. Andi, Lexi, and Mikayla. The frosh are more highly rated, but the sophs will have more experience and a better understanding of what Geno wants. How do those things offset?
