- Joined
- Sep 22, 2012
- Messages
- 1,055
- Reaction Score
- 3,579
If DC wins the National Championship for the second time would they potentially retire the same number twice. Ha. Lower it down then raise it again.
Not retired. The only retired number on the men’s side is Ray, 34. Different than Huskies of Honor.
Lol what? Clingan doesn't need to change his number. He's grandfathered in just like Mariano Rivera with #42I love RIP. I hate retiring numbers.
Put a bust in the training facility. Or in the Alumni Center Sports Museum. Does anyone believe that Clingan is not deserving to wear #32?
and on the women's side, i believe it's only rebecca lobo and swin cash, who are their only currently hall-of-famers (although obviously there will be many more coming)
That’s a silly conclusion. This has nothing to do with Clingan.
Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame was supposed to be the requirement.It seems there is HOF requirement, as Ray, Rip, Lobo and Cash are all in the HOF (college or pro)
Maybe it was, but doesn’t make sense. What if a one and done, e.g. Drummond, was a hall of famer based on pro career? College career should be heavily weighted vs. pro career.Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame was supposed to be the requirement.
A square is a rectangle, but a rectangle is not a square. You're conflating all players that have their number retired are in the HOF with all players who are in the HOF will have their number retiredMaybe it was, but doesn’t make sense. What if a one and done, e.g. Drummond, was a hall of famer based on pro career? College career should be heavily weighted vs. pro career.
Why did you show this to him?
Yes, I get that, but the requirement still doesn’t make sense. And if it was a requirement, it obviously no longer is, opening the door for Kemba, Shabazz, etc. to have their numbers retired.A square is a rectangle, but a rectangle is not a square. You're conflating all players that have their number retired are in the HOF with all players who are in the HOF will have their number retired
You give people gold bars and they complain how heavy they are.A lot of weird nitpicking over an honor for one of our handful of best players ever
You give people gold bars and they complain how heavy they are.
Disagree. It looks cool.It's also ridiculous how in a national championship year, they also are listed in the sweet sixteen section, and the elite 8 section and the final four section, etc. Each year should simply be commemorated for the furthest milestone that was reached.
Because he said the number wasn't going to be retired? Or did I misunderstand him?Why did you show this to him?
You might have someone on ignore. He was responding to a poster saying Emeka's number is also retired alreadyBecause he said the number wasn't going to be retired? Or did I misunderstand him?
Ah, got it. I think it may be the other way around. The post I missed is from someone who has me on ignore.You might have someone on ignore. He was responding to a poster saying Emeka's number is also retired already