Report from today's Open Practice-Wow! | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Report from today's Open Practice-Wow!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Geno-ista said:
After a 2 hr practice today- Geno answered qsts frankly for almost an hour.

Anyone who thinks this team will be anything like the past two years is dreaming.
Expand ...

Well, Tonyc (and a lot of people here) don't think this team will be like last year team, it is better! :)
 
Losing "Steph" was never a big thing.
 
Last edited:
.-.
Geno-ista said:
Losing Steph's personality is like a pin in the balloon- it's a "DoggyDaddy Downer"! You felt it at practice too.
Expand ...

Sorry...I am confused and I am not sure I get the reference. Call me dense or obtuse. What exactly is a "DoggyDaddy Downer"?
 
Geno-ista said:
Great point RL- Stephanie leaving is probably not the magnitude- but I remember the first few pre season games after D left, one in the Civic Center vs Buffalo, or Albany I think. It was like a morgue- what a let down in every way. Losing Steph's personality is like a pin in the balloon- it's a "DoggyDaddy Downer"! You felt it at practice too.
Expand ...
You really need an "F" for this..:rolleyes:
 
RadyLady said:
LOL - DoggyDaddy Downer...please let me know what he thinks of that. I would be interesting in hearing about it! :eek:
Expand ...
It was a harmless reference - off the cuff when I went to write Doggy Downer- it oh - I don't need problems with any of the "big Puba's" on this board!!!
 
pvdoggy said:
Well, Tonyc (and a lot of people here) don't think this team will be like last year team, it is better! :)
Expand ...
PV I am a dreamer and I will disagree with Geno. This team will be a great team. Will they be as great as last years team? IMO the bench lacks experience. The starters are great. They need to jell and theyre not far from that but trying to compare a team of starters with experience to this team is tuff. We will win it all this season. From what Ive seen there is no team that can challenge UConn unless UConn loses the game. Hey they can lose and imo if they do its a fluke .
 
winlots said:
GENO: along with hot news on the recruiting front, this kind of "eyeballs on" reporting is what interests me the most. Much appreciated. I do have one question. When you launched the thread, you commented to the effect that this practice was "dramatically different'" (or an equivalent assertion) from previous years. Could you flesh that out a bit more?

CHI GG: Greetings. That was a surprise. If you were addressing me (looked like you probably were), you are in the wrong pew. The lead in quotes you provide were not mine.
In my many years on here, I've never said a word about Coach shortchanging the players by being away for Olympic teams etc. What I HAVE said is that, as obviously accomplished as he is, I saw several things some years back that he (like all of us) could improve on.....and in my view, as also stated, he improved on them over time.
Most recently in this regard, I put up a thread which made two points: I took issue with his use of personnel in the Stanford game, and I saw evident regression in the baseline inbounding of the ball (an area which needed improvement some time back, and in which improvement had taken place prior to Stanford. ).
(( IF I thought his work with national teams was creating a problem, you know me: I'd SAY so. I don't...and I haven't))
Expand ...
Win- the other practices seamed quicker and crisper and many more different types of drills and then offensive sets. But it just dawned on me- this is the earliest the open practice ever was. Late January last year and Jan or Feb the prior year. So that would explain a lot of what we saw, and maybe what we didn't see from prior year's practices!
 
.-.
Tonyc said:
PV I am a dreamer and I will disagree with Geno. This team will be a great team. Will they be as great as last years team? IMO the bench lacks experience. The starters are great. They need to jell and theyre not far from that but trying to compare a team of starters with experience to this team is tuff. We will win it all this season. From what Ive seen there is no team that can challenge UConn unless UConn loses the game. Hey they can lose and imo if they do its a fluke .
Expand ...
For the record Tony - it will be a shock if they don't become a dominant team. They will hit their stride- no doubt!
 
Geno-ista said:
Win- the other practices seamed quicker and crisper and many more different types of drills and then offensive sets. But it just dawned on me- this is the earliest the open practice ever was. Late January last year and Jan or Feb the prior year. So that would explain a lot of what we saw, and maybe what we didn't see from prior year's practices!
Expand ...

GENO: thanks for getting back on this. Interesting as always. Another part of the explanation might be the large number of new kids to integrate into drills serving as a limiting factor on the number of drills/sets. MIGHT relate to the "crispness" as well
 
winlots said:
GENO: thanks for getting back on this. Interesting as always. Another part of the explanation might be the large number of new kids to integrate into drills serving as a limiting factor on the number of drills/sets. MIGHT relate to the "crispness" as well
Expand ...
I think you are right Winlots. Geno is always so brutally honest, almost to a fault. I think those are all factors. What will be enjoyable, is watching them in March- and April. The gaps in my responses are, my work schedule just doesn't allow me to stay connected all the time. I'm usually a late nighter on the BY, and some wknd activity.
 
winlots said:
GENO: along with hot news on the recruiting front, this kind of "eyeballs on" reporting is what interests me the most. Much appreciated. I do have one question. When you launched the thread, you commented to the effect that this practice was "dramatically different'" (or an equivalent assertion) from previous years. Could you flesh that out a bit more?

CHI GG: Greetings. That was a surprise. If you were addressing me (looked like you probably were), you are in the wrong pew. The lead in quotes you provide were not mine.
In my many years on here, I've never said a word about Coach shortchanging the players by being away for Olympic teams etc. What I HAVE said is that, as obviously accomplished as he is, I saw several things some years back that he (like all of us) could improve on.....and in my view, as also stated, he improved on them over time.
Most recently in this regard, I put up a thread which made two points: I took issue with his use of personnel in the Stanford game, and I saw evident regression in the baseline inbounding of the ball (an area which needed improvement some time back, and in which improvement had taken place prior to Stanford. ).
(( IF I thought his work with national teams was creating a problem, you know me: I'd SAY so. I don't...and I haven't))
Expand ...

Win - my MOST sincere apologies....it was not you to whom I should have been directing my comments, but Msf22b...mea culpa, mea culpa.
I ask your pardon, please.
 
ChicagoGG said:
Win - my MOST sincere apologies....it was not you to whom I should have been directing my comments, but Msf22b...mea culpa, mea culpa.
I ask your pardon, please.
Expand ...

CHI: you KNOW you have it. I'm a fan of yours and no offense was taken. I know you've been putting up with a lot of fierce winds out your way and I took that into account anyway. :oops: Am always pleased just to be on your wave-length. :) Happy Thanksgiving.
 
Storrsbred said:
Curious if the team was present during his Q&A?
Expand ...
No team was not present but when Kia Nurse walked by at the corner of the gym he yelled out to her "and then she had to foul out."
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,064
Messages
4,551,581
Members
10,435
Latest member
DukeBlue


Top Bottom