Well the girls are doing it also with Shea RalphNCAA rules stipulate that out-of-season team workouts, termed "skill-related instruction" sessions, "shall not be publicized and shall not be conducted in view of a general public audience."
Well the girls are doing it also with Shea RalphNCAA rules stipulate that out-of-season team workouts, termed "skill-related instruction" sessions, "shall not be publicized and shall not be conducted in view of a general public audience."
Maybe so but chairs have unlimited hours to spend a week playing vicious post defense on our boys.I think coaches can spend a few hours a week in individual workouts, at least that it used to be
i kinda wish i had a wicked chair avatar nowMaybe so but chairs have unlimited hours to spend a week playing vicious post defense on our boys.
That's not true. They can have the whole team together for a supervised workout for 2 hours a week as long as school is in session. They can also do another so many hours (not sure how many) in groups of at most 3 players.Not to be a wet blanket, but unless we've got an exception, it's an NCAA violation to have supervised workouts now. Calls into question the validity of these reports. Just sayin'.
They can also do another so many hours (not sure how many) in groups of at most 3 players.
There are 3 body types. Ectomorph, Mesomorph, and endomorph. A person is often times a cross between two of them. A pure Ectomorph is tall, thin, has narrow shoulders, and will have difficulty adding muscle and fat. A mesomorph has broad shoulders, a naturally muscular build, low body fat levels, and will easily be able to add muscle without adding fat. An endomorph has a similar build to a mesomorph, but will carry more body fat and will gain body fat more easily. An ecto-mesomorph is naturally thin, but will gain muscle fairly easily with weight training. If anyone has something to add, feel free.
So apparently Taliek Brown was also here either today or yesterday, working with Shabazz.
http://uctv.uconn.edu/shows/sports/emanews/2011/season-2-episode-2-7/
You have to let it load and then skip to the last 12 minutes or so to see the segment with Drummond and Napier. This interview is awful by the way, but what do you expect from UCTV?
Thanks for the great insight you have provided regarding the players and various practices. I certainly would have hired you to conduct the interviews.Man I could be stoned and blackout drunk and do a better job than those two.
hahaha thanks alot, I enjoy hearing that I have a decent insight on each player's development. Unfortunately I feel this kind of stuff has more to do with who you know rather than how much you know about basketball. I mean, it's UCTV so I have no idea how it works but I kind of wished to know that they'd have some better guys reporting. I feel in my short time of watching college basketball I know more than most of these fools conducting interviews asking generic questions.Thanks for the great insight you have provided regarding the players and various practices. I certainly would have hired you to conduct the interviews.
I see so much incompetence in the media relating to basketball analysis. Most of it structured around inherent bias. It would be interesting to start a national forum bringing all fans together under 1 roof to talk hoops in a moderated but open room. If a high quality 1 doesn't exist it would be an interesting concept. I think you hit it right on the nose by saying "Unfortunately I feel this kind of stuff has more to do with who you know rather than how much you know about basketball."hahaha thanks alot, I enjoy hearing that I have a decent insight on each player's development. Unfortunately I feel this kind of stuff has more to do with who you know rather than how much you know about basketball. I feel in my short time of watching college basketball I know more than most of these fools conducting interviews asking generic questions
Hmm, I just left Gampel a half hour ago but can't really remember much else to say about teh SFs.
It would be interesting to start a national forum bringing all fans together under 1 roof to talk hoops in a moderated but open room. If a high quality 1 doesn't exist it would be an interesting concept.
There has to be better people to host this/do interviews than these two dudes, they're brutal.
I see so much incompetence in the media relating to basketball analysis. Most of it structured around inherent bias. It would be interesting to start a national forum bringing all fans together under 1 roof to talk hoops in a moderated but open room. If a high quality 1 doesn't exist it would be an interesting concept. I think you hit it right on the nose by saying "Unfortunately I feel this kind of stuff has more to do with who you know rather than how much you know about basketball."