Report: 2 More Scholarships for MBB | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Report: 2 More Scholarships for MBB

Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,943
Reaction Score
21,967
Seems like this is an overall to any non-p4 schools. On what planet do basketball teams need 15 players? It means bigger programs can take guys and essentially stash them to keep them from other lower level teams.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
10,442
Reaction Score
34,841
Don't the women have 15? Anyone know if Geno ever uses all 15?
I think they had to postpone a game a couple of seasons ago because they had too many injured players and Geno didn't even have all of his scholarships filled
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
941
Reaction Score
2,143
The NCAA didn’t randomly make these changes. This is what the P4 want. This is part of the autonomy all member schools granted them when they gave them the ability make their own rules.

Of course this is designed to benefit them. The goal has always been to price everyone else out of the market. Increasing scholarship numbers is just the beginning.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,743
Reaction Score
48,443
They are going to crush the non-P4 football schools.

There will not be enough good players to compete. EVER. And smaller P4 schools are going to have a very difficult time paying these guys and giving them free scholarships, especially now.

This is a cut-throat move.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
3,775
Reaction Score
8,387
I get this for the other sports... But what legitimate high d1 player wants to sign on to be the 15th guy? As it is, most teams 11-13 will hardly ever play and then transfer out.
He wouldn’t. It’s clearly for developmental players and gpa dawgs.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
36,078
Reaction Score
33,787
They are going to crush the non-P4 football schools.

There will not be enough good players to compete. EVER. And smaller P4 schools are going to have a very difficult time paying these guys and giving them free scholarships, especially now.

This is a cut-throat move.
Cutting their own throats is more likely. Who wants to see the same 3-4 teams every year?
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,754
Reaction Score
9,506
This is unbelievably stupid.
Whether or not it’s “stupid” depends on the result you’re seeking to achieve. The result in football is to horde more talent at the top level to decrease the odds that someone at a lower level can compete with you. That’s not stupid — just selfish.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
50,458
Reaction Score
178,418
Whether or not it’s “stupid” depends on the result you’re seeking to achieve. The result in football is to horde more talent at the top level to decrease the odds that someone at a lower level can compete with you. That’s not stupid — just selfish.
Kids want to play as we've seen with the portal. There won't be much hoarding.
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2017
Messages
3,695
Reaction Score
9,489
I'm trying to figure the logic behind this:
1. Adding a net 25 more men's scholarships would require adding one or more women's sports due to Title IX.
2. Some P4 schools in leagues with big $ media contracts are struggling financially at the current level of sponsored sports and scholarship levels and this won't alleviate that.
3. This would seem to lead to even more dominance by those schools/leagues with the best coaches/teams able to attract the best players and win championships which, as others have pointed out, could lead to fan fatigue and loss of interest and viewership necessary to maintain the value of the media deals.
4. So, what am I missing?
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,305
Reaction Score
17,765
One’s brain must truly be broken to think this is a good idea . . .
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Messages
1,135
Reaction Score
6,269
Don't really see this affecting Basketball, especially in the age of the transfer portal. Basically just ends the NIL walk on loop hole.

For football, I think it'll be a bonus for FCS and lower level schools. Those fringe level walk on and practice players will probably trickle down in search for a roster spot/scholarship money
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
5,450
Reaction Score
22,550
Whether or not it’s “stupid” depends on the result you’re seeking to achieve. The result in football is to horde more talent at the top level to decrease the odds that someone at a lower level can compete with you. That’s not stupid — just selfish.
That is not what the football scholarship increase is for. Players 86 to 105 are the current walk-ons (some schools have more than 105 players on the roster) and this brings stability to their former walk-on programs. All teams want to have a scout team so they can have productive practices. Mora has complained about the lack of practice depth and giving the walk-ons scholarships is the right thing to do. Schools are already paying for walk-ons coaching, food, medical care,... so the only additional cost will be the scholarship. That said, increasing the scholarship limit will not change the fact that most players won't play and they will continue to look for greener pastures through the portal.
 

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
12,219
Reaction Score
19,523
Everyone is missing the point: this is the end of walk-ons. All P4 football, men’s and women’s basketball players have to be paid. Schools do not want to pay walk-ons so this is the solution.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
13,242
Reaction Score
72,077
Everyone is missing the point: this is the end of walk-ons. All P4 football, men’s and women’s basketball players have to be paid. Schools do not want to pay walk-ons so this is the solution.
Yeah reading more into it, that's the case. But I bet more walk-ons will get scholarships now.

I think what will happen is that major schools will take who would have been low major bench guys as their 14th/15th guys and people who would have been walk-ons will now be low major bench guys.
 

awy

Joined
May 23, 2024
Messages
611
Reaction Score
2,943
the benefits of a scholarship is still significant for a lot of kids. i'd think this is good for the elite schools as a way of attracting 0 or low NIL players on a trial basis to be practice/upside players. it'll be a pool of players that is higher quality than walk-ons.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,776
Reaction Score
14,246
They are going to crush the non-P4 football schools.

There will not be enough good players to compete. EVER. And smaller P4 schools are going to have a very difficult time paying these guys and giving them free scholarships, especially now.

This is a cut-throat move.
Ignore the other sports that’s just cover
This is 100% about football and killing any threat to their kingdom.
Pre Title IX these schools would carry up to 130 scholarships. They were limited by the rules after its adoption. You could be on the team for 4 years and never travel or even dress for a game at some of these larger schools .
In basketball for a kid who realizes he is not going to play he has 350 schools with an opportunity to make the Tournament. and he even advance. (Gaffney) importantly the last option in BB not only dresses and travels but usually gets to play.
In football the portal is a reshuffle of the deck in the P realm or relegation to a school were success means a minor bowl game .
 

UKemba15

Some flies are too awesome for the wall.
Joined
Apr 2, 2018
Messages
663
Reaction Score
5,477
This means less walk-ons.
IMG_1902.gif
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
36,078
Reaction Score
33,787
I'm trying to figure the logic behind this:
1. Adding a net 25 more men's scholarships would require adding one or more women's sports due to Title IX.
2. Some P4 schools in leagues with big $ media contracts are struggling financially at the current level of sponsored sports and scholarship levels and this won't alleviate that.
3. This would seem to lead to even more dominance by those schools/leagues with the best coaches/teams able to attract the best players and win championships which, as others have pointed out, could lead to fan fatigue and loss of interest and viewership necessary to maintain the value of the media deals.
4. So, what am I missing?
They want to kill Title IX too.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,743
Reaction Score
48,443
Kids want to play as we've seen with the portal. There won't be much hoarding.
In football, this will change things, in basketball not much change.

But we saw schools like Nebraska hoarding in the past. They used it to their advantage. I know with transfers that it was much easier for schools to move on from kids on the roster, but I'd never underestimate the willingness of football players to go to a school with a 119 scholarships already given.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
92,457
Reaction Score
356,670
That is not what the football scholarship increase is for. Players 86 to 105 are the current walk-ons (some schools have more than 105 players on the roster) and this brings stability to their former walk-on programs. All teams want to have a scout team so they can have productive practices. Mora has complained about the lack of practice depth and giving the walk-ons scholarships is the right thing to do. Schools are already paying for walk-ons coaching, food, medical care,... so the only additional cost will be the scholarship. That said, increasing the scholarship limit will not change the fact that most players won't play and they will continue to look for greener pastures through the portal.
Everyone is missing the point: this is the end of walk-ons. All P4 football, men’s and women’s basketball players have to be paid. Schools do not want to pay walk-ons so this is the solution.
It also allows partial scholarships as there is no proposed requirement to fund all 105 roster spots in football and or the other sports that had scholarship increases.

(It will be a reduction in roster size for a large number of P4 schools and some G5 schools in football.

 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,743
Reaction Score
48,443
It also allows partial scholarships as there is no proposed requirement to fund all 105 roster spots in football and or the other sports that had scholarship increases.

(It will be a reduction in roster size for a large number of P4 schools and some G5 schools in football.

What a bizarre universe we're in. Schools are approaching a demographic / enrollment cliff with less money than ever to fund the school and we're seeing massive increases in scholarships and payments to players at the same time. This is madness.
 

Online statistics

Members online
312
Guests online
2,269
Total visitors
2,581

Forum statistics

Threads
160,163
Messages
4,219,422
Members
10,082
Latest member
Basingstoke


.
Top Bottom