Reed Possibly Returning? | The Boneyard

Reed Possibly Returning?

Joined
Sep 20, 2012
Messages
219
Reaction Score
853
IMG_3573.png
 
.-.
.-.
Actually, the coolest part about that post is the love Tarris obviously has for playing with Silas... and probably the rest of his teammates, too.

And although we take this for granted, I give you the New York Mets as Exhibit A that it is nowhere as easy as it looks to get elite level teammates to genuinely love playing with each other... particularly with all of the money floating around these days. You have got to know that there are guys out there who believe they deserve to have gotten paid more than they got, compared to others. I have seen a few podcasters mention it, and I am sure jealousy is more prevalent than most of us realize.

We are truly lucky that Danny and the staff look for great teammates as part of them being elite level players to fit into the UConn culture.
 
Reed, Hines, Freeman and the cincy 7 fter with Silas running point… suck that 2026 Michigan
I recognize that Michigan’s height made it difficult to score, but I’m really getting annoyed by this prevailing theory that we have to get much bigger quickly to survive. Let me point out that we beat much bigger teams in Illinois twice and Florida, that we were the sixth best team in the country over the season per the NCAA, we reached the championship game and, most importantly, in the championship game, the much bigger MIchigan team couldn’t use their height to score effectively against us and got crushed on the board. The point being while we didn’t win, and I think Michigan was the better team despite the help they got from the zebras, we were big enough to win a national championship.

So while I’m fine with getting bigger if we can do it while also getting better, can we stop with the attitude of desperation because for the first time in 7 games we lost a national final?
 
I recognize that Michigan’s height made it difficult to score, but I’m really getting annoyed by this prevailing theory that we have to get much bigger quickly to survive. Let me point out that we beat much bigger teams in Illinois twice and Florida, that we were the sixth best team in the country over the season per the NCAA, we reached the championship game and, most importantly, in the championship game, the much bigger MIchigan team couldn’t use their height to score effectively against us and got crushed on the board. The point being while we didn’t win, and I think Michigan was the better team despite the help they got from the zebras, we were big enough to win a national championship.

So while I’m fine with getting bigger if we can do it while also getting better, can we stop with the attitude of desperation because for the first time in 7 games we lost a national final?
If we hit a few more threes we'd have beaten Michigan.
 
.-.
I recognize that Michigan’s height made it difficult to score, but I’m really getting annoyed by this prevailing theory that we have to get much bigger quickly to survive. Let me point out that we beat much bigger teams in Illinois twice and Florida, that we were the sixth best team in the country over the season per the NCAA, we reached the championship game and, most importantly, in the championship game, the much bigger MIchigan team couldn’t use their height to score effectively against us and got crushed on the board. The point being while we didn’t win, and I think Michigan was the better team despite the help they got from the zebras, we were big enough to win a national championship.

So while I’m fine with getting bigger if we can do it while also getting better, can we stop with the attitude of desperation because for the first time in 7 games we lost a national final?
That was the joke. Everyone is desperate to start 3 7 footers because one team last year had a roster that really worked
 
They really deserve it given all the years they suspended players for getting bought a meal or someone paying for a plane ticket to a basketball tournament. So many young men were just totally screwed by them for years over the pettiest of things.

Agreed. Any time I stop to think about this juxtaposed to how it’s working now, the NCAA just looms as a truly evil entity. I wouldn’t be surprised if they designated something like “Ed O’Bannon Day” in an effort to deflect and seem like they’re on the same team as the people who have been fighting their unfairness for decades.

Of course it’s a love/hate relationship because college basketball is a product of the NCAA, but maybe it wouldn’t be chaos now if there were just revenue sharing from the beginning like there should have been.
 
They really deserve it given all the years they suspended players for getting bought a meal or someone paying for a plane ticket to a basketball tournament. So many young men were just totally screwed by them for years over the pettiest of things.
They really deserve it given all the years they suspended players for getting bought a meal or someone paying for a plane ticket to a basketball tournament. So many young men were just totally screwed by them for years over the pettiest of things.
Former NCAA President Mark Emmert made 4 1/2 million dollars his final year in office(2023) while telling everyone that college athletes were paid because the universities covered their tuition costs. It was dishonest and selfish of an organization that made an example of anyone who crossed the line this self serving business model. I am ashamed, embarrassed, and still can’t believe the NCAA did this to athletes for decades. NCAA stands for.
No Credibility At All
 
.-.
They really deserve it given all the years they suspended players for getting bought a meal or someone paying for a plane ticket to a basketball tournament. So many young men were just totally screwed by them for years over the pettiest of things.

A super majority of college athletes are compensated with a free college education. That used to mean something.
 
A super majority of college athletes are compensated with a free college education. That used to mean something.
It's not commensurate with the revenues they bring in to the university (and the NCAA). Not by a long shot. Fairness used to mean something (and now does, thanks to the courts).
 
It's not commensurate with the revenues they bring in to the university (and the NCAA). Not by a long shot. Fairness used to mean something (and now does, thanks to the courts).

It absolutely is for a super majority of college athletes covering all sports. And the athletes that do make money, get an education and use the school to develop their skills.

If they were good enough to go pro out of high school they would have. Instead, they go to college to hopefully prepare them for a professional career in their sports. This player development can be worth millions to many division one college athletes.
 
Last edited:
It absolutely is for a super majority of college athletes covering all sports. And the athletes that do make money, get an education and use the school to develop their skills.

If they were good enough to go pro out of high school they would have. Instead, they go to college to hopefully prepare them for a professional career in their sports.
I'm talking specifically about UConn men's basketball players. The post you responded to strongly implied Kirk King and Ricky Moore's punishment back in 96 for accepting improper gifts aka plane tickets.
 
I'm talking specifically about UConn men's basketball players. The post you responded to strongly implied Kirk King and Ricky Moore's punishment back in 96 for accepting improper gifts aka plane tickets.

King and Moore both got screwed. But the player development in a top program can be worth millions to many division one college athletes. If they could've made the same money directly out of high school, they would have.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,468
Messages
4,576,221
Members
10,483
Latest member
Goldjosh21


Top Bottom