Reed and Diarra should start | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Reed and Diarra should start

Joined
Oct 19, 2024
Messages
24
Reaction Score
58
You say slow start against Lamoyne, if they were hitting three's at their normal clip, it would have been considered a fast start. They weren't playing bad, they were just missing open three's.
This. Mahaney had two threes that were in the cylinder and popped back out. If those two stick it probably gives him a confidence boost and changes the whole narrative around his play in that game. This guy was the leading scorer on St Mary’s. That’s an NCAA program not the tomato cans we are playing. He needs to make the adjustment to PG and our offense. People forget what T-New was like when he first got here.
 

Hunt for 7

Built Hurley Strong
Joined
Dec 27, 2022
Messages
1,678
Reaction Score
5,768
I think the only reason Mahaney is starting is simply Hurley trying to keep his confidence at some acceptable level. He knows Hass can handle either role.

But the bigger picture is he just won two chips with starting back courts that were all 6’5” or taller except for Cam who was 6’4” but rebounded like he was 6’7”. Sure we had Joey C coming in for instant offense and Diarra both years but they were off the bench.

Look at our incoming recruits all big guards except for the big guy Riebe, who auto corrects to Reuben which should be fun, Hurley likes big guards and he is not shy about saying it.

Personally, my starting lineup would be Johnson, Karaban, McNeeley, Ross and Ball. I could see Diarra starting over Ball but that is the only question mark for me. Then Diarra sixth man again, Reed Jr and Stewart there is our perfect 8 man rotation. Mahaney needs to figure out how he can play a role like Joey C. Until he defends better that has to be his role. But Joey had swag, Mahaney not sure has that showman in him not with his current body language.

I hope I am wrong about Mahaney, never want to see our guys struggling.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,294
Reaction Score
13,099
I think the only reason Mahaney is starting is simply Hurley trying to keep his confidence at some acceptable level. He knows Hass can handle either role.

But the bigger picture is he just won two chips with starting back courts that were all 6’5” or taller except for Cam who was 6’4” but rebounded like he was 6’7”. Sure we had Joey C coming in for instant offense and Diarra both years but they were off the bench.

Look at our incoming recruits all big guards except for the big guy Riebe, who auto corrects to Reuben which should be fun, Hurley likes big guards and he is not shy about saying it.

Personally, my starting lineup would be Johnson, Karaban, McNeeley, Ross and Ball. I could see Diarra starting over Ball but that is the only question mark for me. Then Diarra sixth man again, Reed Jr and Stewart there is our perfect 8 man rotation. Mahaney needs to figure out how he can play a role like Joey C. Until he defends better that has to be his role. But Joey had swag, Mahaney not sure has that showman in him not with his current body language.

I hope I am wrong about Mahaney, never want to see our guys struggling.
You are right about his D but wrong about his offense. He has it in him to be a great scoring guard. He is a crafty penetrator and score from all 3 levels. He just needs confidence. I personally would like to see him become the 6th man off the bench. I think that is the perfect role for him.
 

willie99

Loving life & enjoying the ride, despite the bumps
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,203
Reaction Score
22,351
Anyone clamoring for Diarra to start should really listen to Dan Hurley's post game comments

Who? Is he the two time defending champion or something? We all know more than that chump

I just reached out to the Lakers and offered my services. Just waiting on their response



I'm just playing, don't go Boneyard on me. But I'm glad we have Dan and I'm just here for the ride.
 
Last edited:

Hunt for 7

Built Hurley Strong
Joined
Dec 27, 2022
Messages
1,678
Reaction Score
5,768
You are right about his D but wrong about his offense. He has it in him to be a great scoring guard. He is a crafty penetrator and score from all 3 levels. He just needs confidence. I personally would like to see him become the 6th man off the bench. I think that is the perfect role for him.
Absolutely agree he has an offensive game. He is a great shooter and handle. If he embraces a role like you mention, I think that is the prime outcome for our team.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Messages
703
Reaction Score
4,525
Rewatch the highlights of the game. With 8 minutes to go, UConn leading 73-35 and cooking on all burners, DH puts his starting lineup back in, Mahaney at point. Everthing immediately stagnates on offense, Uconn going scoreless for the next two minutes. On defense, LeMoyne scores on its next two possessions, each time a driving layup past a flat-footed Mahaney. Time out. UConn retakes the floor without Mahaney. Not saying that was Mahaney's last chance, but there certainly can't be many more.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2015
Messages
1,660
Reaction Score
5,232
You are right about his D but wrong about his offense. He has it in him to be a great scoring guard. He is a crafty penetrator and score from all 3 levels. He just needs confidence. I personally would like to see him become the 6th man off the bench. I think that is the perfect role for him.
Bench time quite often forces a former starter to confront the issues plaguing him with an urgency much greater that if the Coach keeps letting him work it out in his staters role. Weaker kids retreat, stronger kids respond. Doubt Mahaney was recruited thinking he was anything but strong. Would like to see it happen, and see Aidan respond.

On the FB side, Joe Fagnano seems to have responded well to diminished role, while Nick Evers seems to need a taste of it.
 

AtlHusky

Let's go outside our minds and play
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,599
Reaction Score
1,102
I'm also in the camp of starters don't matter much, but one thing I found missing early on that's been effective for Samson, the team, and the crowd, is the lob game. I haven't seen AM look for it much, so I'd like to see Hass, who is effective driving to the hoop, and Samson on the floor together more often early on.
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 4>1 But 5>>>>1 is even better!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,226
Reaction Score
43,329
I'm also in the camp of starters don't matter much, but one thing I found missing early on that's been effective for Samson, the team, and the crowd, is the lob game. I haven't seen AM look for it much, so I'd like to see Hass, who is effective driving to the hoop, and Samson on the floor together more often early on.
You’re echoing what I wrote and what Hurley has stated. He didn’t state directly about Hassan playing with Samson. He stated the guards have not used Samson in the lob game. Since Ball and Mahaney have been primarily playing with Samson the implication is more Hassan and Samson.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,654
Reaction Score
70,269
2 slow starts in a row against bad teams
Reed if given the minutes wil be a monster. He’s much more diversified than Johnson and Johnson’s best position is as a 15 minute energizer off the bench. He’s still very important but he just fouls way too much as a starter.
Diarra gives us a defensive force that can find us easy offense. It’s easy to see both of these players( Reed and Diarra)will give us the lift we need to start the game
Does Hurley know this?
 

Rico444

In the mix for six
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,751
Reaction Score
30,848
I trust in Hurley and this staff fully, so I'm willing to give Mahaney a longer leash, but he hasn't looked great. Certainly not writing him off, as Newton had his ups and downs when he first came over here too.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Messages
703
Reaction Score
4,525
A fair question to ask: Would DH risk an unnecessary loss or two in order to completely fulfill his commitment to Mahaney? I believe he would. Would we?
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,556
Reaction Score
88,244
A fair question to ask: Would DH risk an unnecessary loss or two in order to completely fulfill his commitment to Mahaney? I believe he would.
I don't. If UConn is losing and he's stinking out the joint he's getting the hook. And I don't think starting him is risking an unnecessary loss.
 
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
993
Reaction Score
4,754
A fair question to ask: Would DH risk an unnecessary loss or two in order to completely fulfill his commitment to Mahaney? I believe he would. Would we?
Would Dan Hurley risk a loss for anything? Come on
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
6,878
Reaction Score
24,076
A fair question to ask: Would DH risk an unnecessary loss or two in order to completely fulfill his commitment to Mahaney? I believe he would. Would we?
Hurleys commitment to AM was a UConn scholarship for this season, and to try and coach him up the best he could. That’s his commitment to every player, not being a starter
 

Online statistics

Members online
327
Guests online
1,965
Total visitors
2,292

Forum statistics

Threads
159,601
Messages
4,197,263
Members
10,065
Latest member
bardira


.
Top Bottom