Recently Watched Movies 2024 | Page 14 | The Boneyard

Recently Watched Movies 2024

Hey Adrien! said:
Before Sunrise (1995)

My wife queued it up last night and while I was somewhat reluctant to watch it and fully expected to fall asleep before it ended, it was a beautiful film.

Part of a trilogy where each film is released about nine years apart with the same main characters, this is the first: Ethan Hawke meets Julie Delpy on a train from Budapest to Paris, but Delpy's character decides to spend a day with Hawke's character in Vienna, which is where Hawke's character has to take a flight on the next day.

It's a slow-moving film of mostly dialogue between the two, but the screenplay is intertwined with enough tension, humor, existentialism and awkward early 20-something flirting that it keeps interesting without seeming preachy or [yawn]. Beautifully shot film too w/ pretty mix of city and countryside landscapes.

I'm interested in finishing the trilogy.
Expand ...

Shortly after watching "Before Sunrise", I also watched the sequel "Beyond Sunset". Here is what I wrote about that movie:

<Beyond Sunset (2004) - This is a romantic sequel to "Before Sunrise" which takes place nine years after the original movie. Once again, it is directed by Richard Linklater and starring Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy. This film is pretty similar to the original as the two stars this time meet in Paris, and spend a day together wondering around Paris before Hawke once again has to fly home to the USA. Once again, this film is basically one conversation after another. I believe it is safe to say that if you thought the first film was okay, you will find this film to be pretty watchable as well. I thought it was okay.>
 
nwhoopfan said:
"Hit Man" is new on Netflix. I think it had a very small theatrical run maybe 2 weeks ago? Very loosely based on a real person. Glen Powell plays a teacher at Univ. of New Orleans who moonlights w/ the local PD doing audio/tech stuff on sting operations for people hiring contract killers. In a pinch they send him in to be the fake hit man. He loves it and runs with it. It all gets complicated when he's smitten with a potential perp (Adria Arjona). He talks her out of it, then ends up having a relationship with her. As always, it gets worse and worse with layer upon layer of lies. I found it entertaining.

Powell is everywhere now. He's one of those overnight success stories 10 or 15 years in the making. He's been around, but he's just suddenly blown up in his mid 30s. I still think my favorite role for him was a motor mouthed smooth operator college baseball player in "Everybody Wants Some." Just realized he was reunited with the same director in this one.

Arjona is adorable
Expand ...
Hit Man is very well done, and lives up to all the hype it’s getting. Male and female leads are tremendous. Supporting cast is pedestrian. A pleasant movie to enjoy.
 
Late Bloomers. I'm a sucker for Karen Gillan ever since Dr. Who. This is one of her better acting performances. Young woman has quite a few issues. She breaks her him and is thrust into a world of old ladies in physical therapy. Builds a relationship with an old Polish lady. Then details are revealed about the young woman and why she's in NYC not CA. Flashbacks with her mom and eventually it comes full circle. It's a nice, heartfelt film about emotion, loss, and dealing with challenges and relationships.
 
HuskyHawk said:
Late Bloomers. I'm a sucker for Karen Gillan ever since Dr. Who. This is one of her better acting performances. Young woman has quite a few issues. She breaks her him and is thrust into a world of old ladies in physical therapy. Builds a relationship with an old Polish lady. Then details are revealed about the young woman and why she's in NYC not CA. Flashbacks with her mom and eventually it comes full circle. It's a nice, heartfelt film about emotion, loss, and dealing with challenges and relationships.
Expand ...
Breaks her Hip.
 
nwhoopfan said:
Somehow I never saw "Vision Quest" while I was growing up. I know I've heard plenty of references to it. Finally watched it. Very 80s. Good soundtrack. A bit scattered, but fairly entertaining. I knew Matthew Modine is in it. Didn't realize it also featured Linda Fiorentino, Daphne Zuniga, and Forest Whittaker (barely).


I always complain about actors being much older than the characters they are playing. Well that is nothing new apparently. This had a bunch of mid to late 20s actors playing high schoolers, or a 21 year old in Fiorentino's case.

It was actually filmed in and around Spokane, kudos for that. But for whatever reason they changed the names of all the schools.

edit--oh yeah, Madonna was playing live music in a bar in one scene, it was fairly early in her career, before she turned into a weirdo. Several of her songs were featured throughout the film.
Expand ...
Lunatic Fringe! The video should have been re-labled Lunatic Cringe
 
.-.
nelsonmuntz said:
Pretty good.

I really liked Austin Amelio. That part was important and could have spiraled easily. Half the actors playing dirty cops in the last 30 years are doing a Gary Oldman from The Professional imitation, but Amelio played the character more low key and as a little bit stupider, which totally worked.
Expand ...
It would've been weird watching Amelio do an Oldman impersonation in a scene with Powell, who looks like a young Oldman.

Anyway, I enjoyed it for what it was. I think Powell is an engaging actor, and Anjora brought back shades of Salma Hayek from Desperado.
 
Watched "Life Like" several days ago. Strange one. Addison Timlin and some guy I was unfamiliar with are a young married couple living an idyllic life in (I'm assuming?) NYC, using his allowance from his ultra rich family. Dad suddenly dies, apparently there was no one else, so son inherits the mansion in the country and the business. He's off to work, sort of getting baby sat by the board members. She feels weird having several staff wait on her, so she gives them 2 years severance pay and fires them all. The house is way too much for her to do everything herself, hubs is kinda irked, so lo and behold his company had a secret division where they were developing extremely human looking robots. They go to the secret HQ, look at a few models and pick one out. It was Steven Strait, but I didn't even recognize him. At first she doesn't like the robot, but then she gets it be in a book club just the two of them. Hubs is busy and distracted. Robot starts displaying more and more human like emotions. Hubs is kinda jealous, but likes to establish his dominance. Things get pretty weird. Then there is a humdinger of a twist at the end that changes your perspective on everything that happened during the rest of the movie.

I more or less liked it. I'm a big fan of Addison. This movie included more bare male backside, and other sides, than any movie I've ever seen before. I could've done without that. If you've wondered what Steven Strait looks like without clothes on, this is the movie for you. Plus the other actor I was previously unfamiliar with.

Anyway treads some familiar territory with the ethics of A.I. and humanoid like robots, but different enough from what I've seen before.


Here's the spoiler if you don't want to watch the movie:
The robots weren't robots at all, they were humans. The "inventor" was an insane dude who had somehow acquired several orphans at young ages and systematically brainwashed them into believing they weren't human, and that their purpose was to fulfill the whims of their owners and their creator.
 
Under Paris. This got good reviews and it's not "Sharknado" bad. It's a bit silly at times, but they've tried to go more for "Jaws lite". It's a French film and it starts with a research team studying sharks out in the Pacific, where they think they've discovered something new, or newly adapted/evolved. Then we're back in Paris and the shark shows up in the river and flooded catacombs. Tied in are the River Police, the lead scientist and a group of young, stupid, ecoterrorists. Some of the outcome of the interactions with the sharks is deeply satisfying. All in all, it's not terrible. French with Subtitles on Netflix, but English dubbed is available.
 
Watched "Brats" on Hulu, a documentary about the Brat Pack from 80s movies fame. Directed by Andrew McCarthy. He tracked down several of his fellow actors and interviewed them. I've heard that term countless times, didn't realize most of them didn't particularly like it. Also for the most part they stopped making films together right after the term was coined.

Exactly who was in the pack is up for debate, but this considered the core group Emilio Estevez, Rob Lowe, Molly Ringwald, Alley Sheedy, Judd Nelson and Demi Moore. Of those, Nelson and Ringwald didn't agree to be interviewed. Also pretty much focused on St. Elmo's Fire, The Breakfast Club and most of the rest of John Hughes' films.

There were also interviews with several directors, casting directors, critics, and the magazine writer who coined the phrase.
 
nwhoopfan said:
Watched "Brats" on Hulu, a documentary about the Brat Pack from 80s movies fame. Directed by Andrew McCarthy. He tracked down several of his fellow actors and interviewed them. I've heard that term countless times, didn't realize most of them didn't particularly like it. Also for the most part they stopped making films together right after the term was coined.

Exactly who was in the pack is up for debate, but this considered the core group Emilio Estevez, Rob Lowe, Molly Ringwald, Alley Sheedy, Judd Nelson and Demi Moore. Of those, Nelson and Ringwald didn't agree to be interviewed. Also pretty much focused on St. Elmo's Fire, The Breakfast Club and most of the rest of John Hughes' films.

There were also interviews with several directors, casting directors, critics, and the magazine writer who coined the phrase.
Expand ...

McCarthy is beyond whiny. The "Brat Pack" article was the most incredible publicity possible for a collection of mostly mediocre actors, and should have set them all up for the next 10 years at least. Any actors who were not total idiots would have embraced it, but McCarthy blames it for his career not going anywhere.
 
.-.
Monkey Man (2024 - Peacock) is one of the most amazing action movies I have ever seen. Dev Patel has gone from being a quirky but mostly forgettable younger actor into a true leading man. He is incredible in this movie, both credible as a badass destroying a powerful crime syndicate, but also vulnerable enough that the movie is more than just a generic pseudo-superhero slaughter-fest. Patel is also a heck of a Director. The action sequences are original and compelling to watch.

I think that leaving the love interest out of the movie was a very good move. There is a lot going on with the plot without shoe-horning a contrived romance into it. I am jaded about action movies, and generally get bored with them pretty quickly. Monkey Man is so good that it is worth getting a Peacock subscription.
 
nelsonmuntz said:
McCarthy is beyond whiny. The "Brat Pack" article was the most incredible publicity possible for a collection of mostly mediocre actors, and should have set them all up for the next 10 years at least. Any actors who were not total idiots would have embraced it, but McCarthy blames it for his career not going anywhere.
Expand ...
On one hand, I can understand "get over it already, it was 30 years ago." It sounds like Hollywood in general reacted negatively to the label, so they all distanced themselves from it and each other as much as they could. So not so sure about the article and the publicity setting them up for future success.

McCarthy wasn't the only one whose career didn't really go anywhere after the mid 80s. I think you could say the same about Nelson, Ringwald and Sheedy. Did they all make bad career choices, or was something else a factor?
 
nwhoopfan said:
On one hand, I can understand "get over it already, it was 30 years ago." It sounds like Hollywood in general reacted negatively to the label, so they all distanced themselves from it and each other as much as they could. So not so sure about the article and the publicity setting them up for future success.

McCarthy wasn't the only one whose career didn't really go anywhere after the mid 80s. I think you could say the same about Nelson, Ringwald and Sheedy. Did they all make bad career choices, or was something else a factor?
Expand ...
I wouldn't put Ringwald in that category. She's had a pretty great life and has been involved in numerous non-film projects, plus a couple of long-running TV shows (albeit not critical faves).
 
Wicked Little Letters. This was enjoyable and well done. Stars Olivia Coleman and an appealing Jessie Buckley. Set in Littlehampton England in the 1920s, many are back from WWI. One family (Colemen and her parents) begins to receive “indescribably filthy” letters in the mail. Their next door neighbor is a young Irish mom Rose (Buckley) who swears like a sailor. It becomes a national scandal as others start getting letters. Rose is charged with libel. It’s a comedy and not much of a mystery really. It’s quite fun and the acting is very good.
 
storrsroars said:
I wouldn't put Ringwald in that category. She's had a pretty great life and has been involved in numerous non-film projects, plus a couple of long-running TV shows (albeit not critical faves).
Expand ...
I was surprised looking at imdb, all of them have been in a bunch of movies or tv shows. So they all kept working consistently over the years. But it was mostly stuff I'd never heard of. Anyway glad Ringwald has had a fulfilling life.

Her bit part in "Not Another Teen Movie" was great, spoofing the kind of movies that made her famous.
 
Immaculate. Sydney Sweeney. She's a soon to be nun who goes to remote Italy to join a convent. Warning bells are going off from the opening moments of this movie. It is certainly tense and while her character is a little skeptical, she's not skeptical enough. It's an unusual "horror" film, nothing supernatural but it does have some scares and quite a lot of tension. The ending for me, is a bit much. 2.5 stars.
 
.-.
Horizon (2024) Just saw part one of Kevin Cosner's western epic. It is big filmmaking on very large scale. But there's not much new here. It's also a bit of a jumble and hard to follow. We never stay with one story long enough to care about it before it jumps to another thread. I suppose at some point the threads will come together to form a coherent tale. But it doesn't come close during the first three hours and eleven minutes. People will not be clamoring for Horizon part two after watching this. Two Stars.
 
A few days ago watched "Inheritance," a Polish film on Netflix. Mildly entertaining. Quirky, estranged family is brought together when a rich uncle dies. Well he was faking his death just to bring them together. But the next morning he really is dead. They are forced to play a series of games together to bond in order to receive an inheritance.

Just watched "A Family Affair," just released on Netflix. Kinda corny rom com, but I'm a sucker for Joey King. She plays the assistant to Zac Effron's spoiled, out of touch with reality movie star. By chance he ends up having a steamy romance w/ Joey's mom, played by Nicole Kidman. Zac's a player and Joey always has to clean up his messes, so she's not having it with her mom and her boss. Cathy Bates is also in it as the mother-in-law/grandma. It was so so, but I enjoyed Joey. It's pretty funny in the beginning, then the comedy takes a back seat for most of the rest of the film.
 
Horizon: Chapter One(2024)

Saw this tonight. And I read Pal's review and I concur with it mostly. It's three hours. Yes three hours. And there are three more movies coming.

First off, we were easily the youngest people in theater. This is not a Dad movie, it's a Grandad Movie. The place was packed with blue hair boomers. They literally started clapping when the movie started which was sort of adorable. I think they were hoping to see Ponderosa.

It's kind of dry, but it's watchable because it's punctuated with a few moments of genius. There is one thing really remarkable about it that I am sure will ruffle some feathers on both sides (If anyone watches this) which I will address later.

The movie is four story lines. Most reviews will say there are only three because they forget to mention the Native American one, which is distinct in my opinion. The southwest with Sienna Miller and Sam Worthington, Montana with Costner, and the Santa Fe Trail with Luke Wilson. I give Costner some credit here. His character breaks his normal mold a bit. While he has all of the normal impeccable survival instincts, he winds up manipulated by a younger woman and roped into getting chased by a bunch of sociopaths.

The fourth is the Natives, which is basically a group of Apaches that split in two. One group is younger and driven by violence and killing settlers and another that thinks that nothing good will come from declaring open season on the settlers. This one is really well acted and Costner handles it well, and was for me one of the few interesting parts of a film that really doesn't break much new ground.

Costner buddies Will Patton and Danny Huston are in this too. Hopefully they have a bigger role going forward. Michael Rooker is good playing an Irish Cavalry Sergeant as well. There also a couple of English idiots with Luke Wilson that are there for the audience to dislike and laugh at. The other characters hate them too.

I think this is Sienna Miller's first movie without Werewolves. She does a good job here besides basically just looking great. Worthington is the US Army's oldest Lieutenant ever. Luke Wilson is basically Sam Elliot's character from 1883 except obviously younger. All three/four plots seem to be converging on some settlement called "Horizon" that seems to have been overrun by the Natives multiple times.

The part that is remarkable in this movie, and I basically think it's almost a really clever troll by Costner in that he really doesn't take sides. It's a pretty grown up take on the whole situation. The Natives are very rational in defending their territory and pretty naive about the doom wagon heading their way. The settlers also appear to be rational in seeking space and opportunity but also incredibly naive and oblivious about the impact they are having. Oh and there is the fact that people already live in this place that they still think is empty. Basically everyone with some exceptions is portrayed as flawed but also honorable. The rest on both sides driven by blood lust and greed.

The sequences and scenes are long, and Costner seems to be trying to make a point. In the beginning there is a brutal Apache raid on a settlement. It goes on and on. One part that was gut wrenching was when one family decides to blow itself up with black powder than let the Apaches kill them, it definitely is meant to link the movie to current events. But the best part is the next day when the Cavalry shows up. Worthington asks the survivors, what they were thinking? "Didn't you see the the crosses where the last batch of settlers were buried? Are you stupid?" Danny Huston quips later, "next time don't build your town on an Apache river crossing. Not bad.
 
Waquoit said:
Sounds horrible.
Expand ...
It's not horrible. Everything is well done. It's just not that good.

Cougar's excellent review mentions the scene with the graveyard crosses where the LT asks rhetorically "what do you think that means?"

The settler answer is pretty good. "Don't build on that side of the river."
 
Palatine said:
It's not horrible. Everything is well done. It's just not that good.

Cougar's excellent review mentions the scene with the graveyard crosses where the LT asks rhetorically "what do you think that means?"

The settler answer is pretty good. "Don't build on that side of the river."
Expand ...

And then Worthington goes “how did that work out for you?”

I think the movie is pretty striking in its objectivity.

The flaw in the movie is that it tries to do too much and it feels like we haven’t even gotten to the real story yet. It’s almost a three hour prologue.
 
.-.
Dumplin’ (Netflix)

This sweet Netflix comedy/drama is based on a YA novel and it’s based on Jennifer Aniston’s character that’s a former teen pageant winner who now manages beauty pageants in Texas. Her daughter was never a part of that scene and was mostly raised by her Dolly Parton loving aunt, but she then decides to try out for the pageant. For a Netflix comedy, it’s got some beautifully shot scenes. Recommend if you’re interested in a light comedy with heart.
 
The Outsider (2018). This takes place in Osaka, Japan in the early 50s. Jared Leto is a former American serviceman who is in a Japanese prison. He saves the life of yakuzi member and upon his release from jail joins his gang. I found his journey interesting.

I really liked the pace of this movie which was slow. It is also a quiet film. It feels authentic (whether it is or not I don't know). There is a lot of violence. None of the violence feels gratuitous. And all of it is handled without breaking the pace or quietness of the film. The direction is so seamless you don't notice it. There is real skill in this movie.

It's not for everyone. But this movie keep Leto under control and he gives a very nuanced performance. It feels like you are taking a peek at something hidden. Three stars.
 
Watched a couple of fairly mindless action films this week.

Beverly Hills Cop Alex F (Netflix): If you liked the first two in the franchise, you'll find this very familiar. While mostly panned by critics, I thought it was fine for what it was, and showed Murphy is still the Murphy we loved. It's not a great movie, and I think they tried a bit too hard to set up scenes similar to those in the first two, but I've seen much much worse sequels.

The Beekeeper (Prime): Everything you want a Jason Statham movie to be. He's 55 now, but still looked good in (albeit unrealistic) fight scenes. Not sure how much longer he can do this, so I'll choose to enjoy whatever ridiculous storyline he's involved with. Will probably watch this one again relatively soon.
 
storrsroars said:
Beverly Hills Cop Alex F (Netflix): If you liked the first two in the franchise, you'll find this very familiar. While mostly panned by critics, I thought it was fine for what it was, and showed Murphy is still the Murphy we loved. It's not a great movie, and I think they tried a bit too hard to set up scenes similar to those in the first two, but I've seen much much worse sequels.
Expand ...
BHC Axel F. (2024) I suspect many of this will view it soon. And it is exactly what you expect. You know the plot. The movie centers around Axel and his broken relationship with his daughter who is a Beverly Hills public defender. Rosewood and Taggart ( played by John Aston who grew up in Hazardville, went to Enfield High and once dated my older sister) have reduced roles but are fun to see. This is a well made movie. Everything is to a high standard, cinematography, special effects, stunts, music, editing. They may have cut some corners on the helicopter effects but the rest is A+. They even brought in established co-stars Kevin Bacon and Joe Gordon-Levitt.

Nothing new, everything is familiar, but it is very comfortable two hours with old friends.
 
Stumbled onto something I'd never heard of before on Amazon Prime. "Last Moment of Clarity." Features Samara Weaving and Carly Chaikin, that was enough reason to try it. It's a very slow thriller that's not very thrilling. Not terrible, but not exactly good. Brian Cox was doing a weird accent. Okay, I looked it up and he was actually born in Scotland. Don't know if I've ever heard him doing Scottish before. Half the time it sounded like he was doing a not quite there impression of Sean Connery, and other times it sounded more like a bad fake Russian accent? I don't know, it was weird.

Anyway started with lots of flash backs. Dude from New York is hanging out in Paris wasting his life away. Girlfriend was shot and/or died in a fire 3 years ago. He goes to a little art house theater all the time. One day while watching a film he sees an actress that looks exactly like his girlfriend. So off he goes to L.A. to find her. There he runs into his childhood friend's younger sister, who immediately goes totally out of her way to help him in anyway possible. Sees the actress, she doesn't know him, he makes a fool of himself. Or does she? It keeps going from there, more stuff that happened in New York, some gangsters, gets kinda convoluted.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,640
Messages
4,587,376
Members
10,497
Latest member
Orlando Fos


Top Bottom