- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 27,698
- Reaction Score
- 70,630
What he means is that the look of CGI can make a threatening thing look less threatening. I tend to agree with it.
"I think computer graphics, they’re very versatile, they can do all kinds of things, but they tend to feel a bit safe. That’s why they’re difficult to use in horror movies. Animation tends to feel a little safe for the audience. The Trinity Test, ultimately, but also these early imaginings of Oppenheimer visualizing the Quantum Realm, they had to be threatening in some way. They had to have the bite of real-world imagery. The Trinity Test, for those who were there, was the most beautiful and terrifying thing simultaneously, and that’s where we were headed with this film."
Christopher Nolan Explains Why There's No CGI in 'Oppenheimer'
"I think computer graphics, they’re very versatile, they can do all kinds of things, but they tend to feel a bit safe."collider.com
I read the quote and just disagree. George Miller in one of the best in the industry at practical effects. IMHO no one is better. Fury Road is filled with incredible practical effects. But he still uses CGI in Fury Road especially when he wants to convey massiveness. Tell me that the use of CGI makes the audience in the theater feels "safe" in this sequence.