Fishy
Elite Premium Poster
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction Score
- 178,590
(sorry for the thread drift for anyone that isn't participating)
My brother has the theory that much of the elevation gain and loss on the AT is due to poor trail construction and failure to follow the contours of the landscape. Can't say myself as I haven't had boots on the ground there, but he has.
He has no idea what he's talking about.
You're basically walking the length of the Appalachian Mountain range - with a few exceptions, you're constantly either going up or down. It's unavoidable. By comparison, the PCT was designed for pack animals, so the grades, again with exceptions, is kinder. The difference is fairly significant - 515,000' over 2,200 miles on the AT vs 315,000' over 2,65o miles on the PCT.
Having spent some time on both, if I were to undertake a thru-hike on either one, I would prefer the more open PCT. The AT is a steep green, buggy tunnel that would get on my nerves very quickly.
)