Waquoit
Mr. Positive
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 36,388
- Reaction Score
- 101,702
The shooting will come.
Maybe in an occasional game but honestly, Purvis is a cooler. He just has a terrible shot.
The shooting will come.
AgreedPurvis needs to sit the bench and play 10-15 mins a game. I would rather see Vital out there. Kid has more bball IQ then a 5th year Purvis.
He'll come around and start scoring, he just needs to break the ice.
I have to admit, I'm disappointed thus far, I thought he was going to be a leader and that's just not happening thus far
The shooting will come. He's in a rut of some kind. Who knows why. He's doing some other good things with the rebounds, assists and trying to get to the rim. He's also our best perimeter defender by a huge margin, and since we can't seem to guard against 3's we need him out there.
It will not come. The rut has been for 5 years now. It takes him 20 shots to score 14 points. And honestly, i'm bullish on "being our best defender." Give Vital his minutes.
It will not come. The rut has been for 5 years now. It takes him 20 shots to score 14 points. And honestly, i'm bullish on "being our best defender." Give Vital his minutes.
@noeynox completely agree with your assessment that it doesnt seem like anybody knows their role and the guys look lost out there. It's one thing for that to happen to the freshman but for Purvis, Adams, Brimah and Facey? Bizarre.
I agree, but why would those guys (aside from Brimah) know their roles?
This is lousy coaching. Facey is a PF...period. Purvis is a SG. Adams is a PG. Brimah is a C. Larrier is SF. Those should be set in stone. Bring the freshmen in only in complimentary roles around those guys. Gilbert can be on the court as PG with Purvis or as SG with Adams. Vance can be a SG or can spell Larrier at SF, but should never be on the court with both Purvis and Larrier. Facey should be on the court as a 4, with Larrier or Jackson as a 3 and Brimah or Enoch as a 5. He shouldn't be asked to play the 5 with Larrier at the 4. That's a disaster waiting to happen.
- Facey played sparingly, and often at the 5, which not a position he's ever played for UConn.
- Adams is a pass first, drive to score PG. So he's out there with Gilbert who is on the ball? What the hell is his role in that situation? I sure as hell don't know and I doubt he does.
- Purvis is a shooting guard. He's out there and Adams, a guy who can't really shoot, is playing his position at the same time. Purvis is playing SF for some reason, but there is Larrier also playing SF at the same time. What the hell is his role? Is it any wonder he looks lost?
I agree, but why would those guys (aside from Brimah) know their roles?
This is lousy coaching. Facey is a PF...period. Purvis is a SG. Adams is a PG. Brimah is a C. Larrier is SF. Those should be set in stone. Bring the freshmen in only in complimentary roles around those guys. Gilbert can be on the court as PG with Purvis or as SG with Adams. Vance can be a SG or can spell Larrier at SF, but should never be on the court with both Purvis and Larrier. Facey should be on the court as a 4, with Larrier or Jackson as a 3 and Brimah or Enoch as a 5. He shouldn't be asked to play the 5 with Larrier at the 4. That's a disaster waiting to happen.
- Facey played sparingly, and often at the 5, which not a position he's ever played for UConn.
- Adams is a pass first, drive to score PG. So he's out there with Gilbert who is on the ball? What the hell is his role in that situation? I sure as hell don't know and I doubt he does.
- Purvis is a shooting guard. He's out there and Adams, a guy who can't really shoot, is playing his position at the same time. Purvis is playing SF for some reason, but there is Larrier also playing SF at the same time. What the hell is his role? Is it any wonder he looks lost?
I agree, but why would those guys (aside from Brimah) know their roles?
This is lousy coaching. Facey is a PF...period. Purvis is a SG. Adams is a PG. Brimah is a C. Larrier is SF. Those should be set in stone. Bring the freshmen in only in complimentary roles around those guys. Gilbert can be on the court as PG with Purvis or as SG with Adams. Vance can be a SG or can spell Larrier at SF, but should never be on the court with both Purvis and Larrier. Facey should be on the court as a 4, with Larrier or Jackson as a 3 and Brimah or Enoch as a 5. He shouldn't be asked to play the 5 with Larrier at the 4. That's a disaster waiting to happen.
- Facey played sparingly, and often at the 5, which not a position he's ever played for UConn.
- Adams is a pass first, drive to score PG. So he's out there with Gilbert who is on the ball? What the hell is his role in that situation? I sure as hell don't know and I doubt he does.
- Purvis is a shooting guard. He's out there and Adams, a guy who can't really shoot, is playing his position at the same time. Purvis is playing SF for some reason, but there is Larrier also playing SF at the same time. What the hell is his role? Is it any wonder he looks lost?
It's almost like the upper class men know thw younger players are better, but are reluctant to let them lead and the younger guys don't assert themselves enough. The exception seemed to be Alterique before he got hurt.@noeynox completely agree with your assessment that it doesnt seem like anybody knows their role and the guys look lost out there. It's one thing for that to happen to the freshman but for Purvis, Adams, Brimah and Facey? Bizarre.
Guess this isn't the Purvis bashing thread I thought it was.He shot 39% from 3 last year on 180 attempts (and 48% from 2). What are you even talking about?
Maybe the most frustrating player in recent UConn history. I don't feel like bashing him right now because he is probably a good dude and I've been bashing him on group texts enough already. Hopefully, he doesn't continue to hurt the team.

I agree, but why would those guys (aside from Brimah) know their roles?
This is lousy coaching. Facey is a PF...period. Purvis is a SG. Adams is a PG. Brimah is a C. Larrier is SF. Those should be set in stone. Bring the freshmen in only in complimentary roles around those guys. Gilbert can be on the court as PG with Purvis or as SG with Adams. Vance can be a SG or can spell Larrier at SF, but should never be on the court with both Purvis and Larrier. Facey should be on the court as a 4, with Larrier or Jackson as a 3 and Brimah or Enoch as a 5. He shouldn't be asked to play the 5 with Larrier at the 4. That's a disaster waiting to happen.
- Facey played sparingly, and often at the 5, which not a position he's ever played for UConn.
- Adams is a pass first, drive to score PG. So he's out there with Gilbert who is on the ball? What the hell is his role in that situation? I sure as hell don't know and I doubt he does.
- Purvis is a shooting guard. He's out there and Adams, a guy who can't really shoot, is playing his position at the same time. Purvis is playing SF for some reason, but there is Larrier also playing SF at the same time. What the hell is his role? Is it any wonder he looks lost?
Geez I hate to disagree all these guys are basketball players and none should be labeled with a number. Most of them are interchangeable, especially the guards. I mean I don't want to see Purvis at the point but the other 2 are fine on or off the ball. Wouldn't have been any different if DHam stayed as we would have had 2 PG's, 2 SF's and "5" as our best lineup it would seem. Again, these kids are supposed to know how to play and if Kentan is needed at the 4 or 5 this shouldn't be asking all that much. Griffey played the 2,3,4 and 5 his last year and Deandre the 3,4,5. If we need to blame the coaches, and we can by all means, it's because we need to get smarter, better and more flexible players to fit their system I think.
Ollie has said time and time again he wants everyone interchangeable and doesn't look at position. He has said he refuses to label players a PG/SG/SF/Pf/C. He wants everyone to know their all the roles.
Most of them except Brimah can do more than one thing (and he shouldn't be asked to). But Gilbert is not a better distributor than Adams, not even close. He is a better shooter than Adams. So why not play to their strengths? Let Adams be on the ball when he is in. Meanwhile, the 3 guard lineup sucks, but it is made worse when Larrier is in, because you have 4 guys who play on the perimeter. We saw that pathetic offense for 2.5 games. That's just bad coaching. If you want Purvis at the wing forward, then do it when Larrier is getting a rest. Don't throw out lineups that create confusion.
Giffey was a pretty uniquely adaptable player, and Deandre was as well. Maybe some day one of these guys gets to that, but none of them are now. Larrier might be closest, but he has a tendency to drift to the perimeter even when he's playing the PF spot, and that hurts our rebounding and makes us easy to defend.
I hear ya on stuff. I won't agree on the AG JA deal though but it's close no doubt. JA just never slows down and he really needs to now, he IS the guy. Can't play at 100MPH and run a team but he will get it, he's a talented kid and knows how to play when he gets to his spots no doubt.
Agree he's been shaky and turnover prone, but why? He wasn't last year. He was steady as hell. I think it could be because of pressure due to AG. I hate to see Gilbert get hurt and he's going to be great, but watch Adams and see if he starts playing better. He is just a sophomore.