In games like this you can't totally exclude Allie and Q, can you? They played less minutes than Ice and Jana. Granted just 1 less than Jana. Anyhow, why do you think Sarah Strong wouldn't be enough with minimal Ice or Jana? Or how about Aubrey with Sarah adding some inside baskets?
I just have always felt there is way too much infatuation with height. Am I wrong? For example, there is an assumption that the elite teams will throw of UCONN's perimeter. So, UCONN's strength is that they have 3 special perimeter players and quite a few others whose strength is outside too in which several others are more efficient than either. Ice and Jana are both near the bottom in efficiency. So, playing these BiG East teams, these two young players are going to jump high in efficiency, so much so, that when it comes down to NCAA Tourney, these others teams with much more inside experience are going to get "out-maneuvered" by a freshman such as Jana? There's a willingness to accept that the superior perimeter players on UCONN touted extremely high are going to get shutdown but someone like Jana as a frosh who has struggled thus far, won't? IMO this to me has no logic. If these elite teams are so awesome up front, the chance that juts because UCONN gives minutes to Jana vs "G_Town" and "Providence" that she can be relied upon in pressure situations to outmaneuver inside the more elite teams with elite frontlines.
Also, do you really believe that Jana missing her two layups today was due to the primary fact that she is afraid to get pulled? How about her 35.3% Free throw shooting? She is shooting so awful from the line because she is scared to get pulled?