Oh, so having one guy dinged most of the year is equivalent to having your two best players miss multiple games? I'm sure they were both magically healed and 100 percent when they got back.
Btw, we realize he's Ed Cooley. That's why we are so jacked.
IMO if both PC and UConn were injury free and eligible this year UConn would be a projected 4-6 seed right now and PC would be a 9-12 seed. I think that's more than fair. Do you agree?
UConn just has a more impressive resume even if we magically gave PC 5 wins against the crap PC lost to with a depleted roster.
UConn was leading both UL and Georgetown before Napier was injured in both games. Injuries have cost UConn two games (Georgetown/Cincy) if not three games (UL) this year, IMO. Injury free, UConn could have wins over UL, Cuse, Gtown, Michigan State, and ND. Those are the current #10, #12, #7, #9 and #21 teams in the country. Look at Napier's plus/minus in the Gtown game and that one is pretty obvious. Cincy was a 5 point loss with half a game from Giffey and no Napier. The UL game is a bit less obvious, I'm not sure how much Napier's shoulder hurt UConn in that one.
PC's best win is at home against #21 and that loss to DePaul still looms. It was a 10 point loss at home to DePaul with a full roster. Even if I give you that one due to players not being fully recovered, I don't think you could claim injuries cost you wins against top teams, just losses against 5 scrub teams.
I thought UConn's OOC was light:
MSU, UVM, Quin, UNM, Stonybrook, UNH, NCST, Harvard, UMES, Fordham, Washington
then I looked at PC's:
NJIT, Bryant, UMass, PSU, UNCA, Fairfield, HC, MSST, URI, Colgate, BC, Brown
That is cupcake city there folks.
All that said, I like Cooley for PC. I wouldn't want him at UConn but I think he's a good fit for PC.