Post game news conference Hurley and Whaley | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Post game news conference Hurley and Whaley

Our F game has our starters shooting 28% from the field, shooting 42% from the ft line, having as many turnovers as assists for the game, our superstar having a horrible game, our starting forward going 1-10.
Do you think for a second that outside of the foul shooting that Maryland had anything at all to do with our poor performance? Not all of it of course but you don't think their defensive effort had any effect? To me an F game is bad across the board. We did some things decent. They played good defense and we couldnt make a shot to save our lives. Nova did a similar number on us.
 
They had 20 more shots than their opponent and had 21 offensive rebounds. They scored 54 points. The other team only scored in the low 60s. It’s wild you can’t comprehend just how statistically improbable last night was.

Who gives a _____ if it's statistically improbable? Are you people serious? They played like ____ and lost. For whatever reason they could not defend a pretty mediocre to decent college 2 guard like Ayala when half our lineup is the same size as the kid.

When their inconsistent offensive performers make shots this team looks pretty good. When they don't, it doesn't. Same story all year. Christ with this fluke nonsense.
 
Do you think for a second that outside of the foul shooting that Maryland had anything at all to do with our poor performance? Not all of it of course but you don't think their defensive effort had any effect? To me an F game is bad across the board. We did some things decent. They played good defense and we couldnt make a shot to save our lives. Nova did a similar number on us.
I thought we were absolutely horrendous across the board, the only good thing was offensive rebounding because we missed so many shots and then kept missing the layups off of our offensive rebounds. I always think the other team has something to do with it but I knew we were in trouble very early in that game because we were walking the ball up the court.

I said it was going to be a game where we let the other team dictate pace, it's a problem with Hurley and he seems unwilling to make adjustments. if we lost the game while pushing the ball and using our open court athleticism and abilities I would have been okay with it. i don't think we would've lost if we played that way but it would've been a lot easier to accept. The way we played and Hurley coached left a bad taste in my mouth. His quotes after the game made it even worse.
 
What is Hurley's NCAA record anyway. Has he won any games ever. I know I can look it up but this guy should be a lead recruiter not a head coach IMO.
 
I'm thankful for the turnaround of the program. I'm thankful for the recruiting battles we have won. I'm thankful that we made the tournament and had no 'bad' losses in a quad sense. I also am 100% on board that the team did this in spite of injuries, and not being 100% rehabing from injuries. There was also great individual improvements by players in spite of offseason and in season limitations. Credit to players and coaches. We rebounded, played hard, and hung in fighting in every game. I wish we could make 2 ft shots because this was maddingly frequent. I wish we could make foul shots in a couple key spot but it happens. The Maryland game is disappointing, but one positive takeaway was Gaffney being aggressive and trying to step up.

I also don't think a person is a bad fan to expect the team, each player, and the coach, to perform up to what they have set as their own expectations based upon how they can perform. With respect to Hurley, does it really make sense that you have an impact player like Sanogo that you call transformational, and sit him on the bench forfeiting his strengths for half a game against good teams because you haven't schemed a way to cover his weaknesses? Is it unfair to point out that Hurley benched Sanogo in every game that he didn't like the defensive matchup, yet we didn't win any of those games with the alternative strategy he chose? Is it unfair to point out that the team can't reliably get open shots for your best 3 point shooter who is 6'9?

Hurley isn't quick to jettison his preconceived notions and those notions haven't been universally right. I'll point out that Hurley stayed with Gilbert in spite of boneyard criticism and eventually the change in tactic worked last year. Hurley had Whaley playing limited minutes last year and got forced into a change worked, (to the surprise of most). Adams was playing out of necessity, but in the opinion of many, he was playing too many minutes as a Hurley defensive favorite. There hasn't been much of a clamor objecting to Adams lack of play down the stretch. Nothing wrong with saying that Hurley has to up his game planning schematically and use of personnel in addition to having a few shooters.
 
I thought we were absolutely horrendous across the board, the only good thing was offensive rebounding because we missed so many shots and then kept missing the layups off of our offensive rebounds. I always think the other team has something to do with it but I knew we were in trouble very early in that game because we were walking the ball up the court.

I said it was going to be a game where we let the other team dictate pace, it's a problem with Hurley and he seems unwilling to make adjustments. if we lost the game while pushing the ball and using our open court athleticism and abilities I would have been okay with it. i don't think we would've lost if we played that way but it would've been a lot easier to accept. The way we played and Hurley coached left a bad taste in my mouth. His quotes after the game made it even worse.
I agree with the uptempo pace. All season in fact. Even JC mentioned it in that interview. It's my biggest complaint on Hurley. If we are going to recruit athletes like AJax, we need to turn them loose a little. I think Hurley thought he could manage our poor shooting by playing a slow, low scoring style and play defense and rebound. Kind of how an NFL teams tries to play ball control and run the ball a lot to hide a mediocre QB and keep their defense off the field. Problem is it made our margin for error razor thin and we just didnt have the shotmakers to play that style. We would inevitably have stretches or in this case entire games where we just couldnt score. We are just too easy to defend in the half court. We have 2 threats. Bouk and Adama. Sanogo is always in foul trouble. Teams can also converge on him and have little fear of our 3 point shooters. Bouk gets their best defender and help. Teams are aware of him always. They also dare him to shoot the 3 and he was subpar from there this season. The only thing I disagree with is I dont think we are good enough to have the luxury to throw our C game out there against any 10 seed and expect to win. Maybe we could squeak one out but Maryland, while not world beaters, played a tougher schedule, beat better teams. They had wins against Wisconsin, Purdue, Illinois, Rutgers, Mich St. We beat USC 4 months ago. It was a 7/10 game. The spread was like 3.5.
 
.-.
What is Hurley's NCAA record anyway. Has he won any games ever. I know I can look it up but this guy should be a lead recruiter not a head coach IMO.
He got R. I. to the tournament twice and won a game each year as an underdog to schools from power conferences ( Oklahoma with a college player of the year candidate, Trae Young) and Creighton. It's amazing how little knowledge many posters have about college basketball in general...... but have no problem sharing how little they know by asking ?? that they could simply google and educate themselves before posting nonsense. What's that old saying...... If people think that you're an idiot stop posting before you remove all doubts.... yup that's the saying.
 
Who gives a _____ if it's statistically improbable? Are you people serious? They played like ____ and lost. For whatever reason they could not defend a pretty mediocre to decent college 2 guard like Ayala when half our lineup is the same size as the kid.

When their inconsistent offensive performers make shots this team looks pretty good. When they don't, it doesn't. Same story all year. Christ with this fluke nonsense.
Now you are talking in circles. Last week, you were arguing Cole is a good to great defender. Now its Hurley's fault because Cole was unable to stop Ayala(or anyone for that matter)on the defensive end and really struggled even getting into an offense on the other end. Maybe you should shift the blame. At some point, the kids simply didn't execute. This was one of those games. The stats prove it. They suggest that we weren't dominated at all. It suggests we sucked on the floor.
 
This board is odd. Is it split 50/50 ollie/ Hurley still? Who was the other northeast recruiting head coach option for us? I’m not being a jerk. I was into musselman and Oates and no too into Hurley but realized the Tristate recruiting he could bring. Add in Kimani and the staff. Who was your choice if not Dan nosweetsixteen Hurley? FYI- he has until this contract to get there.

Let’s be honest here. Being in the Big East is a pretty big advantage in recruiting that coach Hurley has and coach Ollie did not have.
 
Yes. They were getting wide open 3's and dunks already.

A zone would have broken their rhythm, made them think, prevented Ayala from getting our players on an island in the paint with no help.

They would've still taken 3s, but hopefully contested instead of wide open. Maryland struggled against zones this year. Maybe it wouldn't have worked. But he didn't try... anything else schematically.

I probably would have tried the triangle and two. Or maybe 1-3-1. Heavy zone on the perimeter with a few bigs anchoring the paint.
 
Let’s be honest here. Being in the Big East is a pretty big advantage in recruiting that coach Hurley has and coach Ollie did not have.
F recruiting. He sucked when he had superior talent in the AAC. Before the march run he under achieved with Bazz and Boat as well. He wasn't a great coach. He had some great isolation scorers who caught fire and made him look better then what he was. KO was never the answer. And i was a KO guy. But sure being in the AAC we shouldve expected a drop off, but we didnt drop off, we collapsed. And that's all on KO
 
They got dominated by a team that dictated tempo and style of play. The advantages that UConn had going into this game were not even marginally exploited. Acting like it’s some sort of fluke that they lost because they missed a bunch of layups is wild.

40+ rebounds, but we didn’t exploit our advantages. The stupid runs strong here.
We missed easy shots. Full stop.
 
.-.
I agree with the uptempo pace. All season in fact. Even JC mentioned it in that interview. It's my biggest complaint on Hurley. If we are going to recruit athletes like AJax, we need to turn them loose a little. I think Hurley thought he could manage our poor shooting by playing a slow, low scoring style and play defense and rebound. Kind of how an NFL teams tries to play ball control and run the ball a lot to hide a mediocre QB and keep their defense off the field. Problem is it made our margin for error razor thin and we just didnt have the shotmakers to play that style. We would inevitably have stretches or in this case entire games where we just couldnt score. We are just too easy to defend in the half court. We have 2 threats. Bouk and Adama. Sanogo is always in foul trouble. Teams can also converge on him and have little fear of our 3 point shooters. Bouk gets their best defender and help. Teams are aware of him always. They also dare him to shoot the 3 and he was subpar from there this season. The only thing I disagree with is I dont think we are good enough to have the luxury to throw our C game out there against any 10 seed and expect to win. Maybe we could squeak one out but Maryland, while not world beaters, played a tougher schedule, beat better teams. They had wins against Wisconsin, Purdue, Illinois, Rutgers, Mich St. We beat USC 4 months ago. It was a 7/10 game. The spread was like 3.5.
Agree with all of that. We might have the most athletic wings in the country in Bouknight and Jackson, Martin ain't too shabby and yet Hurley refuses to run. It's so evident we are a different team when we run. Our halfcourt offense gets completely bogged down against good teams, it's not too hard to defend a team in the halfcourt when they don't have outside shooting threats. Hurley's inability/refusal to run and make in game adjustments is a troubling trend. Coaches like players can and should improve, he still has a lot to work on.
 
Agree with all of that. We might have the most athletic wings in the country in Bouknight and Jackson, Martin ain't too shabby and yet Hurley refuses to run. It's so evident we are a different team when we run. Our halfcourt offense gets completely bogged down against good teams, it's not too hard to defend a team in the halfcourt when they don't have outside shooting threats. Hurley's inability/refusal to run and make in game adjustments is a troubling trend. Coaches like players can and should improve, he still has a lot to work on.
I was critical of Hurley in the game, but they absolutely tried to run against Maryland. You could hear the coaches yelling to push it. But there was nowhere TO run, because as expected, Maryland made a lot of effort to get back on D with 4 guys on every possession.
 
I was critical of Hurley in the game, but they absolutely tried to run against Maryland. You could hear the coaches yelling to push it. But there was nowhere TO run, because as expected, Maryland made a lot of effort to get back on D with 4 guys on every possession.
Seriously. Just watch the game. By the time a rebound was in hand there were 3-4 Maryland guys already back on D. That's what Maryland always does, and they were extra careful about it this game.
 
I wouldn't vote for zone either, but at least a zone might've prevented those three massive dunks from MD with no one in the lane. So there's that.
I’ve been saying this to myself all season. I hate the way we just refuse to change up the defense sometimes.
 
I don’t understand what people here expect. He took a dumpster fire of a program that was recruiting kids off YouTube and put that program back into the national spotlight to be respected again. We had a successful season. It’s going to get better
I don't expect a team to have two poor games in a row in their two most important games of the season to date. This team beat nobody who was ranked (except a UCS victory very early in the season) and merely won games they should have. I know KO and he wasn't recruiting off of YouTube. After the Maryland game, based on the national commentators and newspapers, UConn has not earned any respect, it's "star" fizzled and the HC looked like a deer caught in the headlights of an oncoming semi.
Should KO have been sent packing - yes. Did we intend to hire a HC who could recruit athletes and roll the ball out and just let them play? Hopefully not but right now it sure looks like it may be.
I've said it several times, nobody is beneath having a mentor, and Dan Hurley really needs an experienced HC who has coached in the big conferences and wants to sit next to him on the bench to offer guidance as an assistant coach.
I'm all for allowing him to have a go at getting it done, he deserves it, but in 3 seasons nothing has shown me that Dan Hurley has adequately prepared a unit for battle against the big boys. This has to be a priority as well as recruiting positional players with specific skill sets.
These things can be fixed and Dan Hurley can be successful but he needs to change many things - some are easy fixes
 
.-.
Make layups at even a remotely reasonable rate and they win.

Hurley can do a lot, but he cannot make a layup for them.
But he can have them practice what to do on offensive rebounds. Bring it back out, set it up and make Maryland play defense again. It's not like UConn hasn't had a problem with layups all year (look at 1st Creighton game shooting stats and this game, the Pips (i.e. anyone not named Bouknight) shot the same).

Problem is that was the "normal" UConn inside shooting %. Martin shotputs putbacks, this hasn't changed, Whaley shoots like he is looking and aiming the wrong direction (he actually doesn't shoot the layup he flings it). How about practicing layups?

Watched parts of most all games to date and UConn looked the most ragged offensively in virtually every aspect.

UConn passes the ball without purpose and often one handed and with less oomph than Sister Jean would use.

What coach would have a 2 for 16 three point shooter like Jackson think it was ok to take even one 3 in an NCAA tournament game? In the history of UConn basketball if it weren't for Terrance Samuels he would be the worst 3 point shooter of all time.

Why not start Polley and Gaffney instead of Cole and Martin? Why not prepare for isolation offense by opponent (Creighton and Villanova did it) against Cole, Martin and Bouknight and have a strategy other than hope opponent misses the layup?

Very poor team offensive performance, that's on the coach. As for defense, Maryland shot 51%, hold them to 40% and would have won the game (so offense was not the only poor performance).

Boneyard fans laugh at Boehiem as a coach, seems like he's done a better job with less talent than Hurley.
 
I don't expect a team to have two poor games in a row in their two most important games of the season to date. This team beat nobody who was ranked (except a UCS victory very early in the season) and merely won games they should have. I know KO and he wasn't recruiting off of YouTube. After the Maryland game, based on the national commentators and newspapers, UConn has not earned any respect, it's "star" fizzled and the HC looked like a deer caught in the headlights of an oncoming semi.
Should KO have been sent packing - yes. Did we intend to hire a HC who could recruit athletes and roll the ball out and just let them play? Hopefully not but right now it sure looks like it may be.
I've said it several times, nobody is beneath having a mentor, and Dan Hurley really needs an experienced HC who has coached in the big conferences and wants to sit next to him on the bench to offer guidance as an assistant coach.
I'm all for allowing him to have a go at getting it done, he deserves it, but in 3 seasons nothing has shown me that Dan Hurley has adequately prepared a unit for battle against the big boys. This has to be a priority as well as recruiting positional players with specific skill sets.
These things can be fixed and Dan Hurley can be successful but he needs to change many things - some are easy fixes
Are you gonna listen when every time you say this people tell you he has Tom Moore for that role? My guess is you still won't
 
Let’s be honest here. Being in the Big East is a pretty big advantage in recruiting that coach Hurley has and coach Ollie did not have.
Not according to some people on here. I won't point out again who those posters are.
 
I don't expect a team to have two poor games in a row in their two most important games of the season to date. This team beat nobody who was ranked (except a UCS victory very early in the season) and merely won games they should have. I know KO and he wasn't recruiting off of YouTube. After the Maryland game, based on the national commentators and newspapers, UConn has not earned any respect, it's "star" fizzled and the HC looked like a deer caught in the headlights of an oncoming semi.
Should KO have been sent packing - yes. Did we intend to hire a HC who could recruit athletes and roll the ball out and just let them play? Hopefully not but right now it sure looks like it may be.
I've said it several times, nobody is beneath having a mentor, and Dan Hurley really needs an experienced HC who has coached in the big conferences and wants to sit next to him on the bench to offer guidance as an assistant coach.
I'm all for allowing him to have a go at getting it done, he deserves it, but in 3 seasons nothing has shown me that Dan Hurley has adequately prepared a unit for battle against the big boys. This has to be a priority as well as recruiting positional players with specific skill sets.
These things can be fixed and Dan Hurley can be successful but he needs to change many things - some are easy fixes
While you're on your monthly defend KO by muther-ding Dan Hurley why don't you take up a collection or start a go fund me page on Facebook to help finance KO 's lawsuit against UConn and try and help him get his old job back so he can complete the total destruction of our once proud program..... seriously
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,202
Messages
4,556,742
Members
10,442
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom