- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 37,283
- Reaction Score
- 39,398
Holding out for B1G.As of 6:59, 40% of our fan base is clueless and would stay in the Big East. Yikes.
Holding out for B1G.As of 6:59, 40% of our fan base is clueless and would stay in the Big East. Yikes.
I didn't call Big East basketball a bunch of midgets, I called the schools in the conference a bunch of midgets. And it's not an all-sports conference, so it's a glorified mid-major (albeit with very good basketball).No matter how many times you call Big East basketball a bunch of midgets and a mid-major it doesn't make it true.
Instead it makes you look really stupid and invalidates any good stuff you might have in your posts.
Because the longevity of the institution as a whole is based on brand power and perception. Do we want to be a “flash in the pan” or have many future decades of success.How is this at all relevant (or cogent)?
I would appreciate an actual answer.Sincerely, I hope you are not in charge of your family’s finances.
Not reasonable at all. But yes it would be having our cake and eating it too.What drives the P5? Football.
If the B12 expands it is based on football.
It’s reasonable to think that if the B12 wanted UConn Football, it may consider taking UConn for football only.
It would be the best position for UConn to remain in the Big East and to have its football in the B12, even with the uncertain future of the B12.
Have you ever been on a B1G campus? UConn isn't in the same league, either literally or figuratively.Holding out for B1G.
Yeah, this is a Nova fan take. No conference would want UConn football and not UConn basketball. That's absurd. Honestly, the B12 would be happy to have our baseball team too. The closer reality is that UConn basketball is clearly back, and our football improved enough not to be a huge impediment to adding us.Not reasonable at all. But yes it would be having our cake and eating it too.
Because the longevity of the institution as a whole is based on brand power and perception. Do we want to be a “flash in the pan” or have many future decades of success.
Who is better set up to thrive as an institution in the long run? A school like Michigan State or Penn State with great brand power in a nationally recognized conference… or a school, actually ranked ahead of both academically in recent years, like UMass that top H.S. students outside of their own state would rarely consider going?
I’d rather us be known more like a Penn State or a Michigan State than a UMass on a national level.
I live in Tennessee. Plenty of people down here are familiar with Penn State, Michigan State, Virginia, etc, all schools we could and should be peers of. They want their high school kids going to those state schools. Very few are familiar with “UConn” and I doubt anyone knows anything about UMass lamo.
I don’t know why you’re trying to invoke concerns about UConn’s legitimacy as a school. It’s silly and not relevant to the discussion. But sure I’ll play along with this tangentBecause the longevity of the institution as a whole is based on brand power and perception. Do we want to be a “flash in the pan” or have many future decades of success.
Those schools have institutional pedigree in research and endowments that UConn simply does not have. Sports had little to do with establishing that. If we were a research institution heading back to pre-WWI and were still so behind today, maybe you’d have an argument.Who is better set up to thrive as an institution in the long run? A school like Michigan State or Penn State with great brand power in a nationally recognized conference… or a school, actually ranked ahead of both academically in recent years, like UMass that top H.S. students outside of their own state would rarely consider going?
I’d rather us be known more like a Penn State or a Michigan State than a UMass on a national level.
As your tweet demonstrates, being a good school is being a good school, regardless of what your anecdotal residents of Tennessee (lol) think. People shy away from the northeast because they’re biased against the region and/or because of weather. It’s that simple.I live in Tennessee. Plenty of people down here are familiar with Penn State, Michigan State, Virginia, etc, all schools we could and should be peers of. They want their high school kids going to those state schools. Very few are familiar with “UConn” and I doubt anyone knows anything about UMass lamo.
We had six wins last year and made a bowl game in Jim Mora's first year. He made it very clear he wasn't satisfied with that.The travel would be ridiculous, and I think recruiting, especially in Hurley’s back yard, would take a hit. I don’t think playing Kansas and Baylor every year is as attractive as it sounds to kids from the northeast. Some kids value the BE traditional rivalries. I get that moving from OBE to AAC won’t be as bad as moving NBE to B12, and I’m not saying that it’s a guarantee, but I see the risk.
I don’t know how excited the fan base would be. We need to win to get people to show up. Nothing changes if we become and remain a 1-2 win team in the B12.
yeah because the weather in Happy Valley or Michigan is great in the winterI don’t know why you’re trying to invoke concerns about UConn’s legitimacy as a school. It’s silly and not relevant to the discussion. But sure I’ll play along with this tangent
Those schools have institutional pedigree in research and endowments that UConn simply does not have. Sports had little to do with establishing that. If we were a research institution heading back to pre-WWI and were still so behind today, maybe you’d have an argument.
In what way are you concerned about UConn’s long-term longevity as an institution?
As your tweet demonstrates, being a good school is being a good school, regardless of what your anecdotal residents of Tennessee (lol) think. People shy away from the northeast because they’re biased against the region and/or because of weather. It’s that simple.
No one in your area of Tennessee knows who the national champion in men's college basketball was for this year? That seems unlikely. And, I'm just taking a guess here, I kind of get the sense that Tennessee women's basketball fans might know who UConn is.I live in Tennessee. Plenty of people down here are familiar with Penn State, Michigan State, Virginia, etc, all schools we could and should be peers of. They want their high school kids going to those state schools. Very few are familiar with “UConn” and I doubt anyone knows anything about UMass lamo.
They don't have electricity in that part of Tennessee.No one in your area of Tennessee knows who the national champion in men's college basketball was for this year? That seems unlikely. And, I'm just taking a guess here, I kind of get the sense that Tennessee women's basketball fans might know who UConn is.
See now that's an entirely credible answer.They don't have electricity in that part of Tennessee.
"Very few are familiar with UConn."I live in Tennessee. Very few are familiar with “UConn” and I doubt anyone knows anything about UMass lamo.
True, very trueThe issue with this is that if ACC breaks up - big12 would invite those schools and they’d go for the $ rather than rejoin a reconstructed old BE. Then we’d really be screwed without any seats left
Like the original Big East? Yeah, we liked that too.I think the best solution is a combination of the B12 and Big East and ACC
The travel would be ridiculous, and I think recruiting, especially in Hurley’s back yard, would take a hit. I don’t think playing Kansas and Baylor every year is as attractive as it sounds to kids from the northeast. Some kids value the BE traditional rivalries. I get that moving from OBE to AAC won’t be as bad as moving NBE to B12, and I’m not saying that it’s a guarantee, but I see the risk.
I don’t know how excited the fan base would be. We need to win to get people to show up. Nothing changes if we become and remain a 1-2 win team in the B12.
And/oryeah because the weather in Happy Valley or Michigan is great in the winter
I'm quoting this post only because I read the 1st and 4th pages last night and now see that the thread is up to 11 pages.It's just a fun poll. It's not a scientific poll.
not happeningHolding out for B1G.
Yes literally every single road trip will take us no closer than Cincinnati or Morgantown; and then most trips are even farther than Milwaukee. I guess we can agree to disagree as to whether college kids care about that. Again, the classes Hurley have coming in are plenty happy with our current peers and aren’t begging to travel to little-brother State schools in fly-over country.Recruiting may take a bit of a hit for northeast kids, I'll concede that but nationally if anything it helps. Call it a wash.
We're talking 10 road trips over the course of an entire basketball season too. Given we already play road games in Milwaukee, Chicago, Omaha, and Indianapolis, it's maybe truly an additional 6 truly inconvenient trips.
The type of fan you are is irrelevant to the discussion. I know you’ll still show up to watch us get blown out by B12 teams, but we are talking about building the fan base back up. Attendance matters when trying to be appealing to what a B1G superconference. The name on the other side of a 60-6 drubbing in front of 6,000 doesn’t impress anyone.I'll tell you as someone who has probably seen 99% of UConn football snaps since 05,
Yes literally every single road trip will take us no closer than Cincinnati or Morgantown; and then most trips are even farther than Milwaukee. I guess we can agree to disagree as to whether college kids care about that. Again, the classes Hurley have coming in are plenty happy with our current peers and aren’t begging to travel to little-brother State schools in fly-over country.
The type of fan you are is irrelevant to the discussion. I know you’ll still show up to watch us get blown out by B12 teams, but we are talking about building the fan base back up. Attendance matters when trying to be appealing to what a B1G superconference. The name on the other side of a 60-6 drubbing in front of 6,000 doesn’t impress anyone.
If you need someone to explain what to do with $350M, I don't know what to tell you. Stick it in a CD and make 5%, it doesn't matter. You take the money. every. time.I would appreciate an actual answer.
And I love that that’s his mentalityWe had six wins last year and made a bowl game in Jim Mora's first year. He made it very clear he wasn't satisfied with that.
Sincerely, I hope you are not in charge of your family’s finances.
It’s dumb either way. You take $350M even if you put $0 into sports. It’s not like the school doesn’t need money. And our facilities are not too notch, nor is our coach pay particularly competitive.I read his post as 'how would you invest the money in the athletic programs?' not invest to make more money.