- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 12,855
- Reaction Score
- 21,363
Memo to tdhusky: winning 14-10 is WAY better than losing 62-50.
That is just wrong. He will do what he needs to do. Pindell is fine but he isn’t the guy to elevate a team. He just isn’t that good a passer. In the game as it is played today you need to be able to pass and pass well. He is basically a scambler. He will drive you nuts but he won’t beat you.With a different HC, probably, but I don't see RE letting a RS freshman QB throw more than 12-15 times per game. He will stubbornly try to grind it out on the ground against 8 in the box week after week after week, almost like turtleball. Of course this will fail miserably...
That is just wrong. He will do what he needs to do. Pindell is fine but he isn’t the guy to elevate a team. He just isn’t that good a passer. In the game as it is played today you need to be able to pass and pass well. He is basically a scambler. He will drive you nuts but he won’t beat you.
That is just wrong. He will do what he needs to do. Pindell is fine but he isn’t the guy to elevate a team. He just isn’t that good a passer. In the game as it is played today you need to be able to pass and pass well. He is basically a scambler. He will drive you nuts but he won’t beat you.
If Pindell can catch the ball, CFL WR? PR? KR? Skat back? In the last 2 games, maybe Krajewski gets a shot to toss Pindell a pass.
Sorry if someone has brought this up, figured I'd bring it up since everyone loves the idea...during the game the announcer compared Pindell to Edelman a few times. Sooooooo, what do you guys think about getting him in the slot or catching out of the back field and getting Krajewski some snaps? Seems like this convo is much better suited at this point in the season than before, this whole thing also assumes he doesn't have stone hands.
I'm only half trolling, Edelman played QB at Kent State where he played around his speed and agility, Pats drafted him and he played special teams and put on a bunch of weigh and turned himself into a stud receiver. Why not give Pindell a head start if possible and some film for scouts?Troll elsewhere.
Because it’s only slightly crazy to change from the position he’s played his whole life to a new one with 2 games left in his college career? I think we should try a trick play to get him in the open though.I'm only half trolling, Edelman played QB at Kent State where he played around his speed and agility, Pats drafted him and he played special teams and put on a bunch of weigh and turned himself into a stud receiver. Why not give Pindell a head start if possible and some film for scouts?
I get it, but I don't think it's going to hurt the team too much if we give a half of football the next two games in a manner which might makes scout at least look. If he breaks a big play or two that would be all it would take for a headline or a video to go somewhat viral, especially with his stats.Because it’s only slightly crazy to change from the position he’s played his whole life to a new one with 2 games left in his college career? I think we should try a trick play to get him in the open though.
myeyedr@myeyedr.comWasn’t taking a shot at Bryant - just saying what happened. Where we disagree is on talent assessment - Pindell is a unique talent, Bryant wasn’t. Nothing personal - just going by Chief’s time tested, proven eye test.
That was one of the disagreements last season between Lashlee and Edsall. Randy benched Pindell after a rough first game but Rhett preferred him over BS. Fair to say Rhett was correct.
I think three is about a 2% chance Edsall does what you are suggesting next season. The only game where he really made no effort to throw this year was UMass and while I can disagree with that decision I can also understand it in that the game was played in a monsoon. Also note that Pindell wasn’t really throwing great in that one and had a really horrible psss picked off to seal the win for UMass. He wasn’t in the right zip code with some of his throws including that one. When UConn had a passer they threw the ball. When they had Brown Todman and Dixon, exceptional college running backs, they featured the run. I think if some folks who post here ran the team Donald Brown would have played guard. Edsall gets that offense has changed and he has changed with it. Unless Donald Brown is on the scout team we will continue to see a pretty wide open attack next year.Sorry I'm not tracking what you're saying is "wrong" with my post. You're talking about Pindell, and I was talking about how RE will likely go to the ground game heavily next year, limiting the number of times the new QB (not Pindell) throws the ball.
Casual take.
Stick to lying on the basketball board.
I think three is about a 2% chance Edsall does what you are suggesting next season. The only game where he really made no effort to throw this year was UMass and while I can disagree with that decision I can also understand it in that the game was played in a monsoon. Also note that Pindell wasn’t really throwing great in that one and had a really horrible psss picked off to seal the win for UMass. He wasn’t in the right zip code with some of his throws including that one. When UConn had a passer they threw the ball. When they had Brown Todman and Dixon, exceptional college running backs, they featured the run. I think if some folks who post here ran the team Donald Brown would have played guard. Edsall gets that offense has changed and he has changed with it. Unless Donald Brown is on the scout team we will continue to see a pretty wide open attack next year.
That was one of their disagreements.
That was one of their disagreements.
Memo to tdhusky: winning 14-10 is WAY better than losing 62-50.
We still saw a significant amount of Pindell last year... There really wasn't much of an argument to be made for Pindell starting over Shirreffs even after you look at the final numbers.That was one of their disagreements.