- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 6,370
- Reaction Score
- 16,556
I am sorry ... but I am in the CONTRA camp. Phil Nolan has not regressed. He is what he is.
For those amongst us that have played on a TEAM - HS or otherwise: There is positioning at being a Big Guy on Offense & Defense; things that the average fan (UConn Boneyard or other) won't ever comment on. Phil Nolan always got that. He knew positioning. He SCREENS well; knows the plays. He stayed consistently between his offensive assignment and the ball. Played Zone & rotated. All good. It is NOT just his propensity to take charge when you are talking Nolan. It's a lot of the little things.
He played last year's tournament in a key role because ... Brimah simply wasn't ready. The highlight of his UConn days may have already come: Dunk against the Spartans in MSG. When you bring up past UConn Bigs, you should look at Wane - Cyrulik - Besselink - Justin Brown - Willingham - Mandeldove. Nolan started higher than all of them in positioning. And IQ. But, he just has not any development further - it seems. Wane got better (of course, he rarely played before UConn); Besselink was a physical talent and learned to score/rebound at a higher level; Cyrulik had more aggressiveness & some shotmaking skill from Day one; Justin Brown never got very far & didn't understand the game; Willingham & Mandeldove never was what Nolan was coming in & never played much.
I think Philip Nolan is the kind of 6-10 kid that you see at the MAAC level often (Fishy - Marist?). Maybe at a A10 program occasionally. With a 20 pound weight gain of good muscle, maybe you can see one of these guys get far better. But, I think we see that Nolan just is not a fluid athlete. He does know the game. And at UConn, we still need to project a Big because we won't often get Diamond Stone. We get lucky with a Okafor, Voskuhl, Thabeet, Brimah.
For those amongst us that have played on a TEAM - HS or otherwise: There is positioning at being a Big Guy on Offense & Defense; things that the average fan (UConn Boneyard or other) won't ever comment on. Phil Nolan always got that. He knew positioning. He SCREENS well; knows the plays. He stayed consistently between his offensive assignment and the ball. Played Zone & rotated. All good. It is NOT just his propensity to take charge when you are talking Nolan. It's a lot of the little things.
He played last year's tournament in a key role because ... Brimah simply wasn't ready. The highlight of his UConn days may have already come: Dunk against the Spartans in MSG. When you bring up past UConn Bigs, you should look at Wane - Cyrulik - Besselink - Justin Brown - Willingham - Mandeldove. Nolan started higher than all of them in positioning. And IQ. But, he just has not any development further - it seems. Wane got better (of course, he rarely played before UConn); Besselink was a physical talent and learned to score/rebound at a higher level; Cyrulik had more aggressiveness & some shotmaking skill from Day one; Justin Brown never got very far & didn't understand the game; Willingham & Mandeldove never was what Nolan was coming in & never played much.
I think Philip Nolan is the kind of 6-10 kid that you see at the MAAC level often (Fishy - Marist?). Maybe at a A10 program occasionally. With a 20 pound weight gain of good muscle, maybe you can see one of these guys get far better. But, I think we see that Nolan just is not a fluid athlete. He does know the game. And at UConn, we still need to project a Big because we won't often get Diamond Stone. We get lucky with a Okafor, Voskuhl, Thabeet, Brimah.