It is on the list, you just have to read further in the article.
I'm not saying that you can't make an arguement that UConn shouldn't be #1 or #2, because you can. But, we're being called the third best program for turning college players into pros. That's pretty solid I'd say. I don't know, maybe I'm not critical enough, but I think giving RA the praise he deserves, admitting that EO has been an amazing pro despite being on bad teams, admitting that there's both quantity and quality, and calling AD the best looking young pro out of UConn is pretty fair. This article isn't a snub.
Looking at their list they're more top heavy where UConn probably has greater depth. UConn at 2 or 3 I think makes sense. No problem with them being 3.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.