- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 13,132
- Reaction Score
- 22,646
noey, I'm not sure I agree...I think the Pac 16 could give them cover...turn the Longhorn network into one of its regional nets. Texas doesn't need the B-12.
They don't need em, but why would you agree to share revenue with new schools, when you are refusing to share it what old partners?
Again, they're going split revenue with schools who haven't been long time partners, like Oregon State, Utah, and Washington State, because they don't think Iowa State, Baylor and Kansas State are worthy?Because these new partners can actually bring in significantly greater revenue than your old partners. USC, UCLA, Oregon, and the balance of the P12 all bring something to the table. The bulk of the B12, save OU and maybe OSU and Mizzou really don't.
Good grief. Potential nightmare scenario. Big XII has nothing to do with Big East.
Next question for Big East football schools -- do you leave the Catholics to go back up to 8 or do you just replace Syracuse and Pitt with UCF and someone else and go back to where you were? And would the Catholics go for that? Remember -- we have two and a half years to come up with the replacements.
I will say this -- if our President isn't going tonight, she better either know where we're going already or have a prior commitment of substantial importance. Because with this story things just got a lot more complicated.
They don't need em, but why would you agree to share revenue with new schools, when you are refusing to share it what old partners?
Again texas could afford to go independent did they really wanted to, but they are finding out they aren't walking into any other conference and dictating terms.
But how much more money are they going to reap than they were currently making in the Big 12? The fact that they continue to look at every conference on earth, leads me to believe that no one is letting them in and keeping all of their revenue from the LHN. If that is the case, is all this trouble really worth it? Lesser schools in the Big 12 could live with LHN arrangement, A&M told them duck no, I was shocked OU didn't say the same thing much earlier. OU and A&M hold weight.Pretty lucrative market in LA, San Francisco, Phoenix, and they are leaving behind only KC/St. Louis, from an LHN perspective.
I believe the thing with UT is that every time the threaten to leave they get a better deal from the lesser members of the B-12. I think they are expecting KU, KSU, Baylorn and ISU to offer the first 40 cents on every dollar of ticket sales if they stay.But how much more money are they going to reap than they were currently making in the Big 12? The fact that they continue to look at every conference on earth, leads me to believe that no one is letting them in and keeping all of their revenue from the LHN. If that is the case, is all this trouble really worth it? Lesser schools in the Big 12 could live with LHN arrangement, A&M told them duck no, I was shocked OU didn't say the same thing much earlier. OU and A&M hold weight.