T-Mac was probably more Durant than Kobe. Maybe 'Melo. He wasn't the shooter KD is, but he was one of the first at his size to play like a guard. Not everyone loved the iso-heavy style of that era, though.Not me - I didn't care for T-Mac in 2003 and I still don't now that people on the twitterverse are trying to make him into Kobe. I think Kobe is overrated too, so I guess it's not totally wrong.
IDK. Have you ever talked to a Kobe stan? They sure as hell didn't need him to die to make him into a mythical figure.Kobe was one of my favorite players also. But it’s true, unfortunately after his death he has been thrust into conversations which he really doesn’t deserve.
T-Mac was probably more Durant than Kobe. Maybe 'Melo. He wasn't the shooter KD is, but he was one of the first at his size to play like a guard. Not everyone loved the iso-heavy style of that era, though.
IDK. Have you ever talked to a Kobe stan? They sure as hell didn't need him to die to make him into a mythical figure.
I think calling him a volume scorer is somewhat harsh (I'd reserve that label for someone like AI), but he certainly wasn't LeBron or KD.I think Melo is proper - T-Mac was more explosive but he was also a volume scorer and his teams never did anything.
Whether that’s fair or not, even at the time I was down on him as a player because of those things.
I think calling him a volume scorer is somewhat harsh (I'd reserve that label for someone like AI), but he certainly wasn't LeBron or KD.
The lack of team success bothers me less than the lack of longevity given how limited his teammates were in those Orlando days. He seemed to peak in his early 20s hence why I'm using 2003 as my cut-off for the purposes of this discussion.