In all fairness to the UNC announcer, probably only one in a hundred could correctly pronounce Scnchuskie.Depends if I get time to warm up or not. At my age, shooting cold my three point percentage would be ridiculously low. With a little warm-up time and then having to take one shot, I would probably go with the wing three. Isn’t the old saying, “750K in the hand is worth 1Mill in the bush?”
Note: a student of mine entered me in a foul shooting contest at Chapel Hill during a UNC versus Virginia basketball game. When my name was called to actually shoot the free throws at halftime, I realized I was wearing an unrelated orange shirt so I had to borrow a replacement from complete strangers because I did not want to be wearing Virginia orange at a UNC foul shooting contest.
I was shooting pretty decent and had hit eight or nine consecutively, but the cheerleaders were taking forever to return the basketball to me, throwing my rhythm way off. One time they even chose to chase down a ball that rolled away rather than reach back into the rack for a close one. I was begging them to speed up the passes. When they said, “Stop,” the public address announcer said the winner was Joe Smith (or something like that) I put my head down dejectedly when the UNC representative put his arm around my shoulder and whispered “No, you won, they just couldn’t say your name!” I still have a copy of the check I earned that day. Had I hit two more I would’ve been in a later contest due to the consecutive makes, plus the check would have been much larger. I attribute the failure to the cheerleaders. Coincidentally, a good friend of mine was chosen to take a halftime shot, which was a dreadful airball. The funny part was, Dick Vitale walked by and said to me, “Man, UNC could’ve used you today.”
No potential of backboard assistance?The picture is of an nba court meaning the corner 3 is closer than the top of the key or wing 3, so idk why the corner 3 is worth more
perhaps for depth perception, shouldnt be banking in a 3, but id take the closer shotNo potential of backboard assistance?
I would ask if I GET to be moving when shooting the layup!do I have to be moving when I shoot the layup?
Right. You're exactly the same as you were over 30 years ago. ;^)It's an easy choice for me.
I once made 29 free throws in a row.
That was over thirty years ago, but you never really lose the stroke, right?
I'm going with the wing 3-pointer (750k).
I've always been a poor free throw shooter and, to me, a wing vs top of the key three-pointer is the same difficulty. My baseline threes are under 20% with lack of a backboard.
Part of me is like ''take the easy layup money, pay those bills!" but I'l take the 30ish% chance of making the three over a nearly guaranteed 50k. It's a one-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Look closer, friend, the arc is tangent to the top of the semi-circle. It's not an NBA court. It's just a really narrow 1900s-era college court. Either way, the corner 3 is much closer, though I still hate the sight line.The picture is of an nba court meaning the corner 3 is closer than the top of the key or wing 3, so idk why the corner 3 is worth more
If you were afforded multiple opportunities, then your approach would be best. As you will have only one shot, I imagine it would be a difficult decision to drop to 70% likelihood for double the payout.Let's consider this from an expected value point of view. I'm probably:
98% to make the layup --> 50K * 0.98 = 49K EV
70% to make the free throw --> 100K * 0.7 = 70K EV
30% to make the top of the key 3 --> 500K * 0.3 = 150K EV
20% to make the wing 3 --> 750K * 0.2 = 150K EV
10% to make the corner 3 --> 1000K *0.1 = 100K EV
So if the value of money is linear to me, I'm probably going with the top of the key 3.
However, the value of money isn't necessarily linear, might be closer to logarithmic. I'd consider the free throw. But probably the top of the key 3. It'd be hard to pass up a 5x increase in payoff for a shot from 7 feet farther away.
Edit: can I revise my answer? If it's shooting on that court, the corner "3" looks like it's about 16 feet. I'll go with that one lol
but you never really lose the stroke, right?
It sounds like you play a decent amount of ball but I think most are overestimating the likelihood of even hitting a layup under that much pressure.Let's consider this from an expected value point of view. I'm probably:
98% to make the layup --> 50K * 0.98 = 49K EV
70% to make the free throw --> 100K * 0.7 = 70K EV
30% to make the top of the key 3 --> 500K * 0.3 = 150K EV
20% to make the wing 3 --> 750K * 0.2 = 150K EV
10% to make the corner 3 --> 1000K *0.1 = 100K EV
So if the value of money is linear to me, I'm probably going with the top of the key 3.
However, the value of money isn't necessarily linear, might be closer to logarithmic. I'd consider the free throw. But probably the top of the key 3. It'd be hard to pass up a 5x increase in payoff for a shot from 7 feet farther away.
Edit: can I revise my answer? If it's shooting on that court, the corner "3" looks like it's about 16 feet. I'll go with that one lol
Bank shot or no bank shot, they count the same.perhaps for depth perception, shouldnt be banking in a 3, but id take the closer shot
But isn't the point of this that if you take more risk then you get paid more for making it? So they wouldn't need to pay anything if they miss. So why not go for it and try to win more money? What's the issue with that? I don't understand your reaction since you're changing the rules of the original game in this thread.I'll tell you what. Anyone on this thread who says they'd take anything more than a layup or FT?
Let's pick a gym. You don't get to warm up. You can take any 3 you want as your first shot. You miss, you pay me 50.00, you make it and I'll pay you 100.00.
Bunch of fat old men living some serious glory days out here.
I think the key to your question is defining "more risk". I know what we look like here and I know most of the people who said they'd try to take a 3 probably haven't touched a ball on a court in a decade. At least. So it's not like "I easily make a layup, maybe I make a 3". They're not making a 3 unless they just super lucky and I'd be willing to bet I'm right there.But isn't the point of this that if you take more risk then you get paid more for making it? So they wouldn't need to pay anything if they miss. So why not go for it and try to win more money? What's the issue with that? I don't understand your reaction since you're changing the rules of the original game in this thread.