- Joined
- Dec 16, 2013
- Messages
- 2,255
- Reaction Score
- 3,369
- NHL wants Seattle - Seattle wants NBA | (no new arena on horizon for at least 4-5 years)
- Jacobs (head of relocation committee) like CT said covets Houston but Les Alexander (owner of Rockets) is extremely cool on the idea of sharing the building with another tenant.
- Portland is a distinct possibility, Moda Center is NHL-ready facility but Paul Allen (owner of the Trail Blazers) only wants a relocation on the cheap or he's not interested + it's been bandied about that the NHL thinks moving a team to Seattle alone could deliver entire PNW which likely diminishes POR appeal to the league.
- Salt Lake City's arena is approaching 30 years old and that market is smaller and less robust than Hartford county in regards to population, TV sets, disposable income and corporate presence. Plus it would be tough for any smaller market to support two winter sports.
- Quebec City is a slam dunk; Owner, Market & Building.
- Las Vegas; Owner, Building, Market? They claimed the ST drive went well but I hold some doubts due to irregularities with the process.
- Hamilton unfortunately will not have a chance until either a. current NBC deal expires b. NHL expands past 32. Then there are the issues with indemnification and whether the Sabres and Maple Leafs would actually sign off.
Kansas City has a building and it's one of the most profitable in the country, bringing in an NHL tenant would hurt the bottom line instead of helping.
Milwaukee will have a building but again would be a struggle for a smaller market to support two winter sports (although they probably would prefer NHL to NBA if they had the choice)
That's about it but unless you want to include Austin, San Antonio, Louisville, Virginia possibly or Atlanta2
- Jacobs (head of relocation committee) like CT said covets Houston but Les Alexander (owner of Rockets) is extremely cool on the idea of sharing the building with another tenant.
- Portland is a distinct possibility, Moda Center is NHL-ready facility but Paul Allen (owner of the Trail Blazers) only wants a relocation on the cheap or he's not interested + it's been bandied about that the NHL thinks moving a team to Seattle alone could deliver entire PNW which likely diminishes POR appeal to the league.
- Salt Lake City's arena is approaching 30 years old and that market is smaller and less robust than Hartford county in regards to population, TV sets, disposable income and corporate presence. Plus it would be tough for any smaller market to support two winter sports.
- Quebec City is a slam dunk; Owner, Market & Building.
- Las Vegas; Owner, Building, Market? They claimed the ST drive went well but I hold some doubts due to irregularities with the process.
- Hamilton unfortunately will not have a chance until either a. current NBC deal expires b. NHL expands past 32. Then there are the issues with indemnification and whether the Sabres and Maple Leafs would actually sign off.
Kansas City has a building and it's one of the most profitable in the country, bringing in an NHL tenant would hurt the bottom line instead of helping.
Milwaukee will have a building but again would be a struggle for a smaller market to support two winter sports (although they probably would prefer NHL to NBA if they had the choice)
That's about it but unless you want to include Austin, San Antonio, Louisville, Virginia possibly or Atlanta2