OT : UConn looking to upgrade the Men's Ice Hockey Program?

[chukwa]

It has always been a financial issue but at least now, instead of immediately dismissing the idea as too costly (which they have always done in the past) they are now legitmitately assessing what it would take to make the move.

Marshall will be safe for as long as we remain at this level (as it would make no sense to make a change if we will continue to offer no support to the program) but his days will be numbered the second we start an upgrade.

I personally think that it is great that we are beginning to show some ambitions here. This is a sport where we realistically can become a legitimate top program in time.

Why exactly will Coach Marshall's 'days be numbered' if we start an upgrade? I feel fairly certain he has earned the right to coach a team with scholarship athletes as opposed to a non-scholarship squad. Where do you get your information?

 

[brasssbonanzaa]

Why exactly will Coach Marshall's 'days be numbered' if we start an upgrade? I feel fairly certain he has earned the right to coach a team with scholarship athletes as opposed to a non-scholarship squad. Where do you get your information?

He has had 11 straight losing seasons in the worst conference in the country. He can't compete against other very, very small schools who have the same scholarship restrictions as his program.

 

[kingdobbs]

Why exactly will Coach Marshall's 'days be numbered' if we start an upgrade? I feel fairly certain he has earned the right to coach a team with scholarship athletes as opposed to a non-scholarship squad. Where do you get your information?

He's, quite frankly, running off the fact that he's an alum of the program itself (possibly groomed to be a caretaker), and had a small amount of success on a limited scale (several very good squads in the D-III ECAC East, competing with D-III powers like Middlebury and Norwich, and two pretty good seasons at the beginning of the MAAC days).

He doesn't treat student-athletes well (a couple of times he's flat out shitcanned nearly the entire team at the end of the season), has recruited about equally as well, and has produced some of the worst-performing teams in program history (as well as the nation). Quite frankly, the only reason he hasn't been fired himself is that the AD cares even less about who's running the program than they do about the program itself.

 

[freescooter]

I don't love Bruce Marshall as the head coach, but let's be careful about dumping on him, too. In fact, while he is playing in the weakest conference in the country, it has over the last few years gotten a lot bit stronger. The additions of Air Force, Robert Morris, RIT, Niagara have all contributed. RIT made it to the Frozen Four a couple of years ago. Air Force and Holy Cross have both won first round NCAA games as #15 or #16 seeds, which means they beat some very good hockey clubs. UCONN beat UMass Lowell earlier this year, the last loss by a Lowell squad that has since won 10 straight. Is the AHA going to match up with Hockey East on a regular basis? Of course not, but it is not the old MAAC either. The other factor that comes to Bruce's defense is that he is competing with minimal scholarships. Last I knew they had none. Someone somewhere mentioned they now have 2 but not sure that is accurate. Pretty much every other team in the conference has between 7 and 12, the league maximum. Again, I'm not saying Bruce is Jerry York or the BU coach, but ask yourself how Calhoun would do if he had to recruit with no scholarships and compete against teams all of whom had them. As far as attendance, I have been to a few games each year and the crowds have been decent considering they have zero marketing. I'd say 850-1000. They usually don't schedule home against basketball, which is a good thing, but I did attend one game against a women's home game and the crowd was pretty much average. There is a group of students but lots of families and high school/youth hockey types around that I don't really think are competing with basketball. And I think that would likely be the market going forward. I think kingdobbs is right about 3000 being average. Like anything BC, BU would probably do much better. Finally, in the interest of full disclosure, I did color commentary on one game on WHUS back in the day, in the old outdoor arena. UCONN-Army. And it was friggin' cold.

 

[huskypantz]

Finally, in the interest of full disclosure, I did color commentary on one game on WHUS back in the day, in the old outdoor arena.

Can a person make an off-color remark while doing color commentary?

 

[kingdobbs]

I don't love Bruce Marshall as the head coach, but let's be careful about dumping on him, too. In fact, while he is playing in the weakest conference in the country, it has over the last few years gotten a lot bit stronger.

...(snipped)...

Again, I'm not saying Bruce is Jerry York or the BU coach, but ask yourself how Calhoun would do if he had to recruit with no scholarships and compete against teams all of whom had them.

Well, perhaps it was too harsh, but I don't think Marshall would be the right person for the team going forward. At the very least, he's pretty unspectacular (in both the good way and the bad way; for instance, I don't recall any serious academic or disciplinary issues out of the program during his tenure, and that's a plus). Mostly though, I think hiring a new coach would be a good symbolic gesture that we're taking hockey seriously, because I just don't think Marshall really has the skills. I'm totally willing to be proven wrong, though.

As far as attendance, I have been to a few games each year and the crowds have been decent considering they have zero marketing. I'd say 850-1000. They usually don't schedule home against basketball, which is a good thing, but I did attend one game against a women's home game and the crowd was pretty much average. There is a group of students but lots of families and high school/youth hockey types around that I don't really think are competing with basketball. And I think that would likely be the market going forward. I think kingdobbs is right about 3000 being average. Like anything BC, BU would probably do much better.

I seriously think if the AD would just market the hockey team like they do their other Olympics, there'd be a strong boost in attendance from what we have now, and produce many more sold out games. I don't see us, even in Hockey East, cresting above 5K, and there's where I'd place the absolute ceiling (which makes options like XL or a refitted Gampel poor choices. We don't want to be like UMass where half their stadium is empty; a better goal might be Yale or Quinnipiac where the venue's small but sellouts are regular).

 

[freescooter]

Well, perhaps it was too harsh, but I don't think Marshall would be the right person for the team going forward. At the very least, he's pretty unspectacular (in both the good way and the bad way; for instance, I don't recall any serious academic or disciplinary issues out of the program during his tenure, and that's a plus). Mostly though, I think hiring a new coach would be a good symbolic gesture that we're taking hockey seriously, because I just don't think Marshall really has the skills. I'm totally willing to be proven wrong, though.

I seriously think if the AD would just market the hockey team like they do their other Olympics, there'd be a strong boost in attendance from what we have now, and produce many more sold out games. I don't see us, even in Hockey East, cresting above 5K, and there's where I'd place the absolute ceiling (which makes options like XL or a refitted Gampel poor choices. We don't want to be like UMass where half their stadium is empty; a better goal might be Yale or Quinnipiac where the venue's small but sellouts are regular).

I don't completely disagree with you on either point for what its worth, but I guess I give Bruce a bit more credit than most since when he was competing at the D-3 level, where nobody had scholarships, he managed to build a very competetive program. They have been on and off competitive in the AHA/MAAC since going D-1. Not great but last year's team was compoetitive. This year's looks like it will be again. Again, not dominating by any stretch, but pretty good. And when you take the scholarship issue into consideration, its pretty hard to argue that they should be great.

As far as attendance, I think they could with a little effort, get around 1200-1500 now. In fact a couple of years ago they actually did try a bit of newspaper advertizing and I think attendance was a bit higher. I'd prefer not to play at the XL Center, too. I think college hockey more than other sports is a campus sport. And I agree that 5000 seats is probably a logical way to think. I have no idea whether or if UCONN could fit anything more into Frietas. Seems like they could add some seating to increase capacity, but to my eye only a few hundred. As to how or whether the facility could be expanded, I'm not sure there either. Seems to me that it would require expanding the penatly box side to enable a second level would be the only way to do it. That particular building is pretty basic construction so it might be doable.

 

[kingdobbs]

There's certainly some room to expand "upwards" over the lobby area and possibly over as far as Morrone and Stadium Road; you'd end up having a look somewhat like Matthews Arena in Boston where there's significant overlap of the upper decking over the lower seating. That might get you 3500, though. If one wants to go to 5K, it's plausible in the space available but would probably require a recentering of the ice surface and expansion into what's currently I-Lot.

 

[Dann]

if your going to go for it in the hockey world then there are 2 paths that get your there. first you have to know that HE or the big10 league is your conf. i would bet that they think HE is a go or conf exp=big10 down the road for all sports. lets say that they will be in a big time league.
1) uconn builds its bball facility and now plays all hom games for m/w in XL. remeber the xl was renovated...you gut gampel and put a rink and 6-8k seats in there.
2) make uconn the only show in town and play hockey in xl, the nhl is a no go in the future...

updating what they have now isn't the answer, i have only been there once but i have been to other hockey facilities(bu/bc/pc/rpi among others). that will not cut it imo. i went to fp in high school and follow hockey somewhat. the whale was like preps 2nd rink. uconn needs a big boy facility. gampel is the answer imo or xl if your really going for uconn is the show...

 

[HartfordHank]

College hockey is not a money loser if you have a program that's in a solid conference, has an arena big enough to sell tickets, and you perform relatively well. Most if not all Hockey East teams break even or make money off their program. How other programs were started or upgraded recently, most notably Penn State, was through securing a donor to fund the initial investment. That could be one thing they're looking at here.

BC has had a very successful Hockey Program and does not make a profit. I am not sure of the attendance average but I would put it in the high 5K to low 6K range. Full house is 7884. A lot of games where opposing fans can get to the game by the T or a short drive helps keep attendance high. Some money from TV but not a lot. A lot of cheap travel (bus to local games with no overnight needed in a hotel) keeps costs down. A double header at Maine every other year being the current exception. Maybe on fall road trip over a weekend and one or two Christmas tournaments.

 

[kibblesnbits]

It depends on what one considers to be a profit, but hockey is generally not a money making sport. Ticket sales are the prime revenue source (little or no TV) and that doesn't go very far. Suppose 3K per game at $10 average (higher for public, lower for students) over an 18 game home schedule (NCAA max is 34 total) yields $540K per year. A competitive head coach will cost $150K+ (sometimes a lot more) and there are generally 3 assistants. Add in transportation, training and sports medicine, support staff, recruiting budget, equipment, etc. and costs can quickly exceed revenues at most schools. That's without calculating the true cost to the school in terms of scholarships and facilities. If those were added only a handful of programs in the country might have a chance to be profitable.

 

[brasssbonanzaa]

BC has had a very successful Hockey Program and does not make a profit. I am not sure of the attendance average but I would put it in the high 5K to low 6K range. Full house is 7884. A lot of games where opposing fans can get to the game by the T or a short drive helps keep attendance high. Some money from TV but not a lot. A lot of cheap travel (bus to local games with no overnight needed in a hotel) keeps costs down. A double header at Maine every other year being the current exception. Maybe on fall road trip over a weekend and one or two Christmas tournaments.

I'm well aware, I've been a BU season ticket holder for the past six years, so I'm all too well versed on the BC program . I can't find the thread now, but on the main hockey forum on USCHO, there was a thread that showed school by school how much each program brought in. BU and BC were in the same ballpark in revenue, about $4 million each. I believe most of that was subsequently spent on hockey expenses or elsewhere in the department. Point is, hockey is a not a burden on the athletic department at most HE schools.

Take BU for instance, tickets are about $26 a game, we're averaging 5,300 a game this year, with usually about 18 home games. That's almost $2.5 million per year in ticket sales alone, before merchandise, donations, etc. Though some are student tickets, so it's probably more in the area of $2 million, Of course, that's on the high end of the spectrum. Take a place like UVM, average it out, and they make about $1.6 million on tickets, assuming 3,000 per game are not students, each ticket is $20, and they have 18 home games. For reference, BC is averaging 6,323 right now, aided a bit by 25% of their home games so far being automatic sellouts vs BU, but that number is fairly representative of what they get per game.

 

[brasssbonanzaa]

It depends on what one considers to be a profit, but hockey is generally not a money making sport. Ticket sales are the prime revenue source (little or no TV) and that doesn't go very far. Suppose 3K per game at $10 average (higher for public, lower for students) over an 18 game home schedule (NCAA max is 34 total) yields $540K per year. A competitive head coach will cost $150K+ (sometimes a lot more) and there are generally 3 assistants. Add in transportation, training and sports medicine, support staff, recruiting budget, equipment, etc. and costs can quickly exceed revenues at most schools. That's without calculating the true cost to the school in terms of scholarships and facilities. If those were added only a handful of programs in the country might have a chance to be profitable.

There is only one Hockey East school - PC that offers the majority of their tickets for $10. BU is $26-28, BC is $20-25, UNH is $24-26, Maine is $22, NU is $16-18, UMass $14-17, UVM is $20, Lowell is $15 or so, and even Merrimack is $15-20. There are certain deals you can get if you're a student from another school or if it's a holiday break game, or if you buy a seat way up in a corner somewhere, but those are the general ticket prices for the vast majority of people buying seats.

 

[kibblesnbits]

I'm not sure about the quality of the data, but here's an interesting site regarding the profitability of different college programs:

http://206.127.4.30/mens-ice-hockey-scholarships/boston-college/

The mix of schools used skews the list to the high side (Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, BU, BC, etc. are among the annual attendance leaders) so the average is probably not meaningful for a typical program, but it should give some insight into the revenue and cost range.

 

[kibblesnbits]

There is only one Hockey East school - PC that offers the majority of their tickets for $10. BU is $26-28, BC is $20-25, UNH is $24-26, Maine is $22, NU is $16-18, UMass $14-17, UVM is $20, Lowell is $15 or so, and even Merrimack is $15-20. There are certain deals you can get if you're a student from another school or if it's a holiday break game, or if you buy a seat way up in a corner somewhere, but those are the general ticket prices for the vast majority of people buying seats.

HE, like many leagues, is divided into the haves and the wannabe's. BU, BC, UNH and UVM can sustain their ticket prices (and even some of those schools give away freebies or greatly reduced tickets to students). The rest not only give away student tickets, but they also offer significant discounts for season ticket holders, staff, groups, etc. NU, for example, may be nominally $16-$18 per game, but season tickets are in the $6-$12 per game range. UMass is about the same - $10/game for season tickets. Heck, I can even get a general public ticket to any BC remaining home game for $10-$20. I suspect the $20-$25 you quoted is their premium game price (BC/UNH). When planning a new program it is probably better to assume a middle of the pack attendance (with a middle of the pack ticket price) rather than looking at long-standing traditional leaders.

 

[Doggie Style]

Couple of things, first, fire Bruce Marshall 15 years ago! Next, this drum has been pounded for years w/ no traction. For those of u who were around when the "Uconn 2000" program was implemented and we were going D1 in Football, the original plan was to move the hockey program to Hockey East and convert Gampel to a state of the art rink. That was of course when we were going to build a Carrier Dome facility in the cow fields on the east side of campus. We all know how that turned out as the locals went nuts and shot it down w/ their concern over the lack of traffic access etc... In addition, Calhoun did go nuts when this was proposed bcuz he didn't want to give up Gampel. The retrofit plans were in place and pretty sweet to convert it to ice. All this was shot down when $$$ came into play as well as the deal that imploded with Kraft w/ Gov Roland re the Pats. Bottom line is that there is little chance of this happening. I was recruited back in the 90's to play hockey @ Uconn and we were given the song and dance about the future. Guess what, I graduated w/ no walls around the ice!!

 

[Dann]

Couple of things, first, fire Bruce Marshall 15 years ago! Next, this drum has been pounded for years w/ no traction. For those of u who were around when the "Uconn 2000" program was implemented and we were going D1 in Football, the original plan was to move the hockey program to Hockey East and convert Gampel to a state of the art rink. That was of course when we were going to build a Carrier Dome facility in the cow fields on the east side of campus. We all know how that turned out as the locals went nuts and shot it down w/ their concern over the lack of traffic access etc... In addition, Calhoun did go nuts when this was proposed bcuz he didn't want to give up Gampel. The retrofit plans were in place and pretty sweet to convert it to ice. All this was shot down when $$$ came into play as well as the deal that imploded with Kraft w/ Gov Roland re the Pats. Bottom line is that there is little chance of this happening. I was recruited back in the 90's to play hockey @ Uconn and we were given the song and dance about the future. Guess what, I graduated w/ no walls around the ice!!

i never went to uconn for school so i'm sure some ppl here don't like when i talk about things that are not on the court/field or recruiting wise but alot of my family has and ive been to campus enough to know whats up over the years. i always thought that the master plan/dreaming future was a little off. uconn is not like most other schools.

you have a state school with a campus thats the big boy in the state, no pro sports, but the campus is north of the major population(hart-nh-ffld). all of the upgrade and athletic building is great but the school i think has been sending mixed signals for years and i'm not a fan of that. some of it is by choice and some is by forces of whats possible(i understand that adpect). playing in gampel and xl imho is not the ticket. play in one. i know the reasons etc but its just not a winning formula. we have a 40k stadium in hartford, good but not big boy yet but were getting there. thats not moving anywhere. i think uconn and the state have to make a choice and stick with it for 30+ years. at this point i say make the population the focus and not the campus. play all games in xl, especially if your going to put $$$ into xl for that revamp?!?! but if you pick hartford you have to make uconn the show in CT, not a hockey team or anything else. thats how you can continue to build a strong fanbase. sure upgrade hockey, but put that show in xl also. sure maybe you only draw 1-2k for a couple years, but being the only hockey show in ct that fanbase will grow just like every other uconn sport over time. and the list and ideas go on, but my point is for some reason uconn is a mixed bag which causes the fanbase(of each sport) to more or less pick its games/sports of interest. if you play all your $$ making sports in the same spot(hart or campus) then your building a following of all sports. the guy who goes to a couple bball games in xl every year, 2 fball games a year now over time invests more into his sports watching and gets season tix to fball, goes to his bball games of choice and now goes to a hockey game or 2 and so on...

the dream/master is that everything is on campus and big but thats $$$ and time etc, there is enought uconn invested in hartford that they should run with it instead of only half play it. if i were to dream i would say 55k fball on campus/down the street, a 15 k bball/hockey arena etc. but we already have half of that in hartford and thats where the population is, so go with it until the state is fully ready $$ wise to putt the eggs in storrs.

 

[B1GEast]

I like it, I agree there seems to be some strategy to be more attractive to bigger conferences. I would also like to see lacrosse added as well.

 

[HartfordHank]

the dream/master is that everything is on campus and big but thats $$$ and time etc, there is enought uconn invested in hartford that they should run with it instead of only half play it. if i were to dream i would say 55k fball on campus/down the street, a 15 k bball/hockey arena etc. but we already have half of that in hartford and thats where the population is, so go with it until the state is fully ready $$ wise to putt the eggs in storrs.

Although the money would dictate what happens I am not a fan of the basketball/hockey arena. It is not the same when you set up a basketball floor on a hockey rink vs a basketball court by itself. The Dean Dome at UNC is an amazing place to watch a game. Totally focused on basketball. The fans are right on top of the game. When you throw in the hockey rink you pull the fan back from the sidelines and lose something. However money would dictate a single arena.

 

[Waquoit]

the dream/master is that everything is on campus and big but thats $$$ and time etc, there is enought uconn invested in hartford that they should run with it instead of only half play it. if i were to dream i would say 55k fball on campus/down the street, a 15 k bball/hockey arena etc. but we already have half of that in hartford and thats where the population is, so go with it until the state is fully ready $$ wise to putt the eggs in storrs.

Why do people waste time with something that will never, ever happen? Besides, there is no benefit to building a 55K football stadium or a 15 K hoop facility in Storrs. It would kill attendance.

 

[Duncan Idaho]

The local population will fight any huge venue expansion plan, UConn couldnt get a 30k stadium in there.

 

[mattp]

sure playing on campus would be ideal, but with all the facilities we need in the state capitol a half hour away why not take advantage of them? i used to love games at Gampel when i was a student but we make more money at the HCC for bball, it's already set up for hockey, and it's closer/easier for the majority of fans. since money is apparently the only motovator behind all AD decisions anymore, why not take the cheap route and use the HCC? at least initially. we could probably figure out a few local opponents that could generate 5k+ fans and build off of that

 

[kingdobbs]

Although the money would dictate what happens I am not a fan of the basketball/hockey arena. It is not the same when you set up a basketball floor on a hockey rink vs a basketball court by itself. The Dean Dome at UNC is an amazing place to watch a game. Totally focused on basketball. The fans are right on top of the game. When you throw in the hockey rink you pull the fan back from the sidelines and lose something. However money would dictate a single arena.

There's a good reason why few teams that play ice hockey (and own their own arenas) use the same arena that they do for basketball. BC is the only one who actually pulls it off with any success (although that basketball success is dwindling some). Mostly you just have UMass (4K average attendance in an 8K arena), Ohio State (<3K in a 17K arena), Nebraska-Omaha (6K in a 16K facility; UNO hoops doesn't play there, but Creighton basketball does), and Northeastern (who draws 22oo for basketball and 3000 for hockey in an arena that seats 5K). The common thread here is that none of those teams come close to filling the space, and it has a definite effect on the venue's intimidation factor. Yale could play its home games in Bridgeport, and judging by the crowds it can bring to the NCAA hockey regionals from the last two times it was there, they could pull off sellouts for big games. Bust most of the time, they'd be playing in front of the same three thousand fans that they could have at Ingalls, with absolutely zero of the 'small barn' advantages they do get from Ingalls. The most intimidating venues I've been to as a college hockey fan (Yost@Michigan, Lynah@Cornell, the old Walter Brown@BU, Cheel@Clarkson, Whittemore@UNH, Alfond@Maine) have all been that way because they're smaller, hockey-specific, on-campus and 95% full. Mullins, on the other hand, is pretty sterile, and its biggest advantage to me as a fan is that you don't have to buy a ticket ahead of time.

 

[HartfordHank]

There's a good reason why few teams that play ice hockey (and own their own arenas) use the same arena that they do for basketball. BC is the only one who actually pulls it off with any success (although that basketball success is dwindling some). Mostly you just have UMass (4K average attendance in an 8K arena), Ohio State (<3K in a 17K arena), Nebraska-Omaha (6K in a 16K facility; UNO hoops doesn't play there, but Creighton basketball does), and Northeastern (who draws 22oo for basketball and 3000 for hockey in an arena that seats 5K). The common thread here is that none of those teams come close to filling the space, and it has a definite effect on the venue's intimidation factor. Yale could play its home games in Bridgeport, and judging by the crowds it can bring to the NCAA hockey regionals from the last two times it was there, they could pull off sellouts for big games. Bust most of the time, they'd be playing in front of the same three thousand fans that they could have at Ingalls, with absolutely zero of the 'small barn' advantages they do get from Ingalls. The most intimidating venues I've been to as a college hockey fan (Yost@Michigan, Lynah@Cornell, the old Walter Brown@BU, Cheel@Clarkson, Whittemore@UNH, Alfond@Maine) have all been that way because they're smaller, hockey-specific, on-campus and 95% full. Mullins, on the other hand, is pretty sterile, and its biggest advantage to me as a fan is that you don't have to buy a ticket ahead of time.

Difficult to justify the cost of building a hockey only facility, especially if you need a new basketball and hockey facility. A school like BU could do it because hockey is their premier sport. A lot of the teams you mentioned are hockey focused or are playing in a an older arena like Michigan.

Then you have Minnesota that has a facility for basketball, men's hockey and woman's hockey. Men's facility sits 10K the woman's 3.4K. Woman's facility was built after the men's facility.

 

[freescooter]

I seriously doubt you could retrofit Gampel, and we're not building a new basketball arena, just a practice center. As far as UCONN hockley goes, I agree that a 5000 seat facility would make the most sense. I don't know whether or if Frietas is expandable. It almost looks like the "rink" building could be expanded at a not too unreasonable cost, and then it would be necessary to bring in some better seating. I don't love the Civic Center option except as an occassional "big game" venue for maybe BC, BU something like that. I never like 5000 in a 16000 seat venue for any sport (or 2500 in a 40000 seat venue) . Worst case, I guess, you could play at the XL and use Frietas as a practice facility. But I agree with kingdobbs that a smaller packed venue is a much better home ice advantage than a large facility that's 3/4 empty. WalterBrown arena was intimidating for that reason. If it is possible to expand Frietas without essentially demolishing everything and rebuilding from the ground up, it would be a pretty reasonable option.

 

[BHusky]

No way the school funds for a new hockey complex and there is no way UConn could turn a profit from Hockey. That is unless they have overwhelming immediate success in a major conference like the HE. Like other sports, ticket sales will be a major factor in revenue. They would be lucky to average 1,500-2k a game as a competitive program.

Based on 2011-2012 data to date, Michigan draws 5,600 on average for games. They are an elite program with 40k+ undergrad. BC draws 6,300 on average in a big time hockey town. They also play many teams that are within 5-45 minutes of their campus like PC, Northeastern, BU, etc. That would be like driving 20 minutes to see UConn play SU or RU in football and we were both top 10-15 in the country.

 

[businesslawyer]

HOckey is not hoops or pigskin. It won't work in Hartford. It has to be on campus for it to work. Otherwise, you'll never get a student, there will never be enthusiasm and the program won't develope.

 

[freescooter]

HOckey is not hoops or pigskin. It won't work in Hartford. It has to be on campus for it to work. Otherwise, you'll never get a student, there will never be enthusiasm and the program won't develope.

Don't disagree. The other point is that it might be possible for a program to eventually break even, but it doesn't have to do that, certainly not in the short term. In fact, the real goal with this, as with pretty much any program, is to keep costs to the university at what they are now at least in the short term.That was the short term goal for football when they were evaluating an upgrade, and it is the short term goal for UMass's football upgrade and for villanova's proposed upgrade. Villanova, for example, currently spends 5 million more for football than they bring in in revenues. They had as their short term objective to run a 1A program that cost no more than $5 million. That really is how one should approach a UCONN hockey upgrade. If they currently "lose" (though I don't think we should think of it as a "loss" any more than we think of the marching Band or the Chess Club expenses or womens soccer expenses as "losses.) $850,000, if you can run a higher level program, with a higher level of ticket income, tv income, donations and so forth and still only face the same $850,000 "loss" you should absolutely do it.

 

[kingdobbs]

Difficult to justify the cost of building a hockey only facility, especially if you need a new basketball and hockey facility. A school like BU could do it because hockey is their premier sport. A lot of the teams you mentioned are hockey focused or are playing in a an older arena like Michigan.

If "that's how successful teams manage it", and "half-empty arenas suck for home advantage" aren't a good enough reason, I have more.

1) Scheduling priority: If UConn hockey shares the same arena footprint as basketball (i.e. a basketball floor on top of the ice plant), they will be at best a third priority (and will drop to fourth if that arena is the XL). Games will be shoehorned onto weekend afternoon and weeknight slots, and attendance WILL not be as high as it could be as a result (weeknight games will be non-starters for the youth hockey portion of the fan base). This would be easier to manage should we be invited to Hockey East (only Maine and Notre Dame will need to be done as two-fers rather than home and homes). I have no doubt that it can be managed well enough, but if a basketball game needs the arena on a specific date, they're going to get priority over hockey, no questions asked.
2) Local youth hockey: UConn's current arena is put to use by local youth (Northeast Ice Dogs) and high school hockey (EO Smith's co-op with Tolland and Windham), partially subsidizing the operations cost. I see no reason that can't continue into a new facility, and those programs will need somewhere to go in any event.
3) Practice time: To some degree, this will be partially alleviated by a separate basketball practice facility as is being currently built. However, women's hockey, men's hockey, youth hockey, men's basketball, women's basketball, and volleyball will all need practice time; you could maintain Frietas as a practice/community rink...but why have the extra cost of maintaining two rinks?
4) Student fans: Having the games off campus to start, without a transition plan to on-campus, will prevent the school from ever building a solid student fan base that is the core of successful hockey programs around the country.

I get the main point: it requires a large capital outlay to start, and that will have to be considered as part of this study. That's why the school is not doing it, but exploring it.

Then you have Minnesota that has a facility for basketball, men's hockey and woman's hockey. Men's facility sits 10K the woman's 3.4K. Woman's facility was built after the men's facility.

But none of them play on the same footprint, now that Ridder has been built. Williams (the hoops venue) used to host all three; now they just have hoops.

 

[HartfordHank]

3) Practice time: To some degree, this will be partially alleviated by a separate basketball practice facility as is being currently built. However, women's hockey, men's hockey, youth hockey, men's basketball, women's basketball, and volleyball will all need practice time; you could maintain Frietas as a practice/community rink...but why have the extra cost of maintaining two rinks?

Practice is always and issue. BC men's and woman's hockey teams often practice at off campus facilities. When the hoop floor is down they lose access to the ice. Fortunately they have multiple ice rinks within a short distance of campus. When the ice is down the hoops teams have access to the Power Gym in Conte forum for practices.

If memory serves me UMass has a hockey rink attached to the Mullin Center. They use that for practice and community skating. They only use the main arena for games.