Typical state effort 5 guys to put up one sign. Probably was done on O.T. But , I do like the sign.
Ever work in traffic before? Oh yeah I'm sure the food cart passes by your desk once or twice a day.
![]()
In a day of electronic neon solar signs that can be programmed remotely...........or you hire 5 to change a sign after 3 others helped fashion the new sign.
With the amount of taxes the Connecticut people pay there should be a high definition jumbo tron at every border of the state. The problem is your money is either embezzled by the politicians or soent on welfare
I don't doubt you work hard for you money as do plenty of others. I work for a firm that does work for the DOT and work with alot of DOT personnel. Quite frankly there's a boatload of deadweight. It could be a function of how they operate (which is completely backwards) or the personnel.
I like the guy who is watching the guy who is holding up the ladder. Classic.IM sure you could have put that sign up yourself, but I do like the effort of the guy holding up the ladder.
I'd like to see them all listed. But I do think the most recent one approach is kind of cool.My only complaint is why don't they just leave the sign up there? All you need to do is replace the last 2 numbers every once in awhile.
Looks like the DOT didn't get the memo (email?) on our new visual identity program (UCONN):
I think it's difficult to draw meaningful conclusions about a group of guys based off of one picture.
.
These guys are getting paid whether they are in the break room or on the road. If there is no other project going on, what is the difference? The money is already in the budget. As long as the DOT doesn't go overfor the Fiscal year, what is the difference? Cheezus, worry about something that you can actually control!!
The full workweek was 36 hours. Nobody stayed late or put in any extra time.
...So I don't want to hear that the money was "in the budget". The budgets are grotesque bloated things that bear no relationship to the cost of providing the needed services. Any sensible Governor should incent every freaking manager in the state to come in under budget. It should be a mandatory part of their compensation. They could do it easily.
I've heard stories from guys that there are state buildings full of unused chairs, desks and etc..Now I finally have to chime in, based on my 1.5 years in service to the glorious state of Connecticut. Yes, post college I had that unfortunate distinction. Worked for the Dept. of Corrections in Hartford, in a brand new department that centralized purchasing of medical supplies and drugs for the prisons. On the whole...a money saver. Negotiated rates with big suppliers and bought in bulk. The prison pharmacists in particular had been very careless and paid too much all the time. I saved a few hundred thousand myself by finding overcharges on (mostly) AIDS drugs. AIDS drugs were a huge part of the budget by the way, at least then.
But. Nobody worked 5 minutes more than was required. I was shocked to find that at 10:15, our appointed Union 15 minute break...work ceased. People just hung up the phone and left. I was castigated for working through the break if I was engaged with a vendor. The full workweek was 36 hours. Nobody stayed late or put in any extra time. Towards the end of the fiscal year, we were always hundreds of thousands under budget. So that began a process of calling all the prisons and ordering as much new, but not needed stuff as we possibly could. Two year old Dental Chair....throw that out, I'll get you a new one! "Spend it all" was the mantra, less the budget be cut back the next year, to where it really should be. That was one tiny department. Multiply by thousands and you have hundreds millions of dollars wasted, every year. So I don't want to hear that the money was "in the budget". The budgets are grotesque bloated things that bear no relationship to the cost of providing the needed services. Any sensible Governor should incent every freaking manager in the state to come in under budget. It should be a mandatory part of their compensation. They could do it easily.
Because it's hourly pay; not salary...
I'm not sure why you're of the belief that employees should work when they're not getting paid to...?
If you want to argue employees should be salaried so that they work as much as necessary, that's a different argument.
Two year old Dental Chair....throw that out, I'll get you a new one! "Spend it all" was the mantra, less the budget be cut back the next year, to where it really should be. That was one tiny department. Multiply by thousands and you have hundreds millions of dollars wasted, every year. So I don't want to hear that the money was "in the budget". The budgets are grotesque bloated things that bear no relationship to the cost of providing the needed services. .
I assume everyone on this thread will be subtracting all their posting and reading time when they fill out this week's timesheet. It would certainly be ironic if everyone's employers wound up paying for time devoted to debating the work ethic and efficiency of state employees.
It's resentment with a side of sour grapes.I'm thinking most of us don't work on a clock and work far in excess of 35 hours week and don't get OT for that time.
This picture is a single explanation of why this state is broke, and not the one positive about what is actually on the sign.
My only complaint is why don't they just leave the sign up there? All you need to do is replace the last 2 numbers every once in awhile.
These guys are getting paid whether they are in the break room or on the road. If there is no other project going on, what is the difference? The money is already in the budget. As long as the DOT doesn't go overfor the Fiscal year, what is the difference? Cheezus, worry about something that you can actually control!!
Bro, the state is in a $2b annual deficit and you wonder how or why that happens. Paying these losers $100k a year and they get free healthcare and huge pensions. Every 1 u can eliminate adds up. Have to do everything possible
The guys doing the work for DOT and other State agencies aren't the problem. The problem in State government is in the excess number of management. Good luck reducing those numbers.