OT - Rutgers and the Big Ten | Page 2 | The Boneyard

OT - Rutgers and the Big Ten

great story, sounds like you have a great fam.
good to know the directional Michigans have a Northern to accompany Central Eastern and Western. Chips, Eagles, and Broncs I believe.

NMU has had a pretty good football tradition, at least through the late eighties. We were D2 national champs in 1975 and made the D2 playoffs as late as 1987. I loved my time in the UP (thus my dayooper handle). CMU and EMU were D2 football up through 1974. CMU was actually the D2 champ in 1974, the year before they went D1 and joined the MAC.

GO CATS!
 
I don't understand how a D1 team can lose by 78. My tiny D3 school in Maryland might lose by less than 78. Might be by 71, but whatever. Wow.

Easy, they gave up. They aren't 78 points worse than Michigan, they just quit. Michigan ran the same play over and over again. The Rutgers players told the Michigan players they just wanted the game over with and this was in the first half.
 
Easy, they gave up. They aren't 78 points worse than Michigan, they just quit. Michigan ran the same play over and over again. The Rutgers players told the Michigan players they just wanted the game over with and this was in the first half.
Rutgers may be awful, but I think that says something about the players and coaching staff when the players give up like that.
 
Rutgers this year against Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State and Penn State:

Outscored 224-0
Outgained 2,258 yards to 382

You're welcome.
 
Rutgers this year against Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State and Penn State:

Outscored 224-0
Outgained 2,258 yards to 382

You're welcome.

Living in NJ, I am keeping my mouth shut this year. I would losing badly to Michigan (78-0), Penn State (39-0) and even Indiana (33-27) in font of 40/50K over losing at home to Syracuse, UCF and Temple at home in front of 20/30K (likely <10K for the Tulane game) any day season. Just not a good season.
 
Living in NJ, I am keeping my mouth shut this year. I would losing badly to Michigan (78-0), Penn State (39-0) and even Indiana (33-27) in font of 40/50K over losing at home to Syracuse, UCF and Temple at home in front of 20/30K (likely <10K for the Tulane game) any day season. Just not a good season.

That's fair, but man, Rutgers is setting football back 148 years.
 
.-.
That's fair, but man, Rutgers is setting football back 148 years.

We all know the reasons why Rutgers was added to The B1G, but dear lord outside of 2 or 3 sports they are completely out of their depth. They were absolutely curb stomped by UM/OSU/MSU, and had Saturday Night's Game not been played in an ice storm The Lions could have dropped 60+ on them. The final total yardage on Saturday was 549-87. That is abysmal. The scary thing is that besides the talent deficit on the field, Ash looks even more clueless on the sidelines than Diaco. I guess RU was hoping that some of OSU's Championship Stink would rub off on them. The problem is that Ash was middling at best at OSU, bailed out by essentially an NFL Defense. They will suck for the next 3 years and likely be hiring another coach to try to return them to the days of Harvard Mon-Fri and USC on Sat LOL.
 
We all know the reasons why Rutgers was added to The B1G, but dear lord outside of 2 or 3 sports they are completely out of their depth. They were absolutely curb stomped by UM/OSU/MSU, and had Saturday Night's Game not been played in an ice storm The Lions could have dropped 60+ on them. The final total yardage on Saturday was 549-87. That is abysmal. The scary thing is that besides the talent deficit on the field, Ash looks even more clueless on the sidelines than Diaco. I guess RU was hoping that some of OSU's Championship Stink would rub off on them. The problem is that Ash was middling at best at OSU, bailed out by essentially an NFL Defense. They will suck for the next 3 years and likely be hiring another coach to try to return them to the days of Harvard Mon-Fri and USC on Sat LOL.

I would give Ash a pass because it's easy to look overwhelmed when you flat out have very little talent to work with. But I agree with the other sentiments.

In fairness to Rutgers, they're essentially still operating on an AAC budget against the Big Ten. Once they're full members, I'd like to see how they compete. They're basically about to quadruple their media revenue in the next few years. That will leave a lot of room for facility upgrades, staff raises and a lot of resources to amp up their ability to fit in against the Big Ten. That's not to suggest in five years they're going from the bottom to top of the standings, but it might look a bit different. Right now though? Yikes.
 
Just to clarify, UConn is the university for the State of Connecticut, which includes Fairfield County and Fairfield County is officially part of the NYC DMA.
So by that standard UMass is in the Boston DMA and the University of Florida is in the Miami and Tampa Bay DMA, er, well the entire state DMA?
 
So by that standard UMass is in the Boston DMA and the University of Florida is in the Miami and Tampa Bay DMA, er, well the entire state DMA?
Yes. The SEC Network reaps big profits in Miami, Tampa, and the rest of the state (well away from Gainesville) due to UF's statewide appeal. Hopefully UConn's appeal in NYC and Boston will be recognized by ACC or B1G.
 
.-.
Rutgers has nothing to complain about. UCONN would gladly accept an offer from the B1G that was a lot lower than the one Rutgers received.
 
Didn't Rutgers enter the B1G the same time as Maryland get gets less than Maryland gets?

LOL - what a loser program!

Had to do w/ AAC exit fee vig versus ACC Exit fee vig --- big difference in assistance required.
 
.-.
But wouldn't they have gotten those same cable boxes + a decent AD if they had taken UConn over Rutgers? That's what I don't get.

Not in NJ they wouldn't. People fail to realize it's the 11th largest state in the country in population. That's a lot of cable boxes.
 
Not in NJ they wouldn't. People fail to realize it's the 11th largest state in the country in population. That's a lot of cable boxes.
Are you sure about that Nick? The Big Ten only gets the carriage fees from the said schools home state?
 
Are you sure about that Nick? The Big Ten only gets the carriage fees from the said schools home state?

The Big10 get higher carriage fees in states they have schools located in. Rutgers gives the Big10 the entire state of New Jersey (approximately 9.2 million people). Since they are actually in the NYC DMA, they get credit for that as well. The normal fee for a state with a Big10 school is around $1.00. The non Big10 state fee is around 10 cents. The BTN negotiated with the NYC cable providers so I'm not sure what they pay per subscriber. I believe it's less than $1.00, though.
 
.-.
I live in NYC and will be sure to check with my cable company to see how we can get the BTN off our cable if it is more than 10 cents.
 
The Big10 get higher carriage fees in states they have schools located in. Rutgers gives the Big10 the entire state of New Jersey (approximately 9.2 million people). Since they are actually in the NYC DMA, they get credit for that as well. The normal fee for a state with a Big10 school is around $1.00. The non Big10 state fee is around 10 cents. The BTN negotiated with the NYC cable providers so I'm not sure what they pay per subscriber. I believe it's less than $1.00, though.
I think they could have gotten credit for the NY DMA with UConn as well. The difference is that 9M>>3M. Plus NJ give the B1G exposure in the Philly DMA as well. It was the right decision from the standpoint of maximizing revenue. From an athletic department perspective, UConn would have been the far better choice.
 
I think they could have gotten credit for the NY DMA with UConn as well. The difference is that 9M>>3M. Plus NJ give the B1G exposure in the Philly DMA as well. It was the right decision from the standpoint of maximizing revenue. From an athletic department perspective, UConn would have been the far better choice.

You'll get no argument from most clear headed B1G Fans. We all know that Rutger, as we call them, was a giant money grab. Delany knew he was getting a major fixer upper but was willing to overlook it because of the benefits of owning real estate in that area. The last round was all about BTN Distribution, East Coast exposure, and recruiting. With the shifting of media consumption I hope a school like Uconn gets a long look based off of accomplishments and what they could deliver content wise in any future realignment scenario.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,160
Messages
4,555,260
Members
10,438
Latest member
UConnheart


Top Bottom