....amid allegations of sexual misconduct....
https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...ch-rodriguez-amid-misconduct-allegations/amp/
https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...ch-rodriguez-amid-misconduct-allegations/amp/
Guilty even after proven innocent I guess.So the school conducted a 10 week investigation and found no evidence to support these allegations. They fired him for having an affair? That’s what this world has come to?
Guilty even after proven innocent I guess.
So the school conducted a 10 week investigation and found no evidence to support these allegations. They fired him for having an affair? That’s what this world has come to?
According to his attorney... the article also says that the person making the allegations refused to cooperate with the school's investigation, which I would am almost sure is at the advice of her lawyer. If you're objectively reading this, it's not possible to come to the conclusion that he was proven innocent. There was obviously enough smoke there for the university to make this move (probably combined with the fact that he's had some pretty mediocre-to-bad teams recently).
Any number of reasons. To limit their liability, because their probably isn't enough evidence to fully get them out of their obligation, to avoid an extended legal battle over it, to avoid negative media coverage, because his teams haven't been great for a while. Pick any number of them. The school's investigation, again, didn't even have access to the accuser (again, almost certainly due to the advice of her attorney).Then why are they paying him his full buyout? I’m not coming to the conclusion that he’s innocent. The school’s own investigation concluded there was no evidence whatsoever to support these allegations.
According to his attorney... the article also says that the person making the allegations refused to cooperate with the school's investigation, which I am almost sure is at the advice of her lawyer. If you're objectively reading this, it's not possible to come to the conclusion that he was proven innocent. There was obviously enough smoke there for the university to make this move (probably combined with the fact that he's had some pretty mediocre-to-bad teams recently).
Because you have your eye on a bigger prize...a lawsuit against him personally and against the school....'pattern of bad behavior', 'failure to oversee his conduct' etc. Bigger pay day is why you don't....Maybe a stupid question - but if you made allegations against someone, why would your attorney tell you to not cooperate in the investigation? Should she then have not made the allegations at all?
Probably to keep them guessing and see if the school would blink first, $$$ wise. He can always argue that the allegations were a form of cooperation anyway and a complaint of sorts.Maybe a stupid question - but if you made allegations against someone, why would your attorney tell you to not cooperate in the investigation? Should she then have not made the allegations at all?
he's 17-24 in the past three seasons.
Wonder if any of that staff or roster is interested in hanging out in Storrs CT for a little while????
Regular Romeo
OK, but is a wooden nickle <sic> worth more than a fair penny?If they had proof that he did 10% of that he would’ve been fired with cause and they wouldn’t owe him a wooden nickle.
In what sense? That there are people that feel this sort of behavior is acceptable at work? I’ve seen people go down for this sort of thing and guess what, it’s never some unwarranted witch hunt. Some people are either totally oblivious to the line or willfully encroach on it and the vast majority will still never see any repercussions.I work from home but it's a scary world we live in.
In what sense? That there are people that feel this sort of behavior is acceptable at work? I’ve seen people go down for this sort of thing and guess what, it’s never some unwarranted witch hunt. Some people are either totally oblivious to the line or willfully encroach on it and the vast majority will still never see any repercussions.
If they had proof that he did 10% of that he would’ve been fired with cause and they wouldn’t owe him a wooden nickle.
Sorry, hard to get the tenor of that, especially in this post where everything seems to be met with derision and we're one step away from some of these guys talking about "men's rights".It was just a joke and I agree with everything you wrote.
We think we're so modern and enlightened. We're no different than the people of Salem, Mass. back in the 1680's with their witch hunts. All it takes is an accusation of racism or infidelity and you are history. Your life is ruined.So the school conducted a 10 week investigation and found no evidence to support these allegations. They fired him for having an affair? That’s what this world has come to?