sammydabiz
🇺🇸
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 1,688
- Reaction Score
- 3,410
I support the players 100%
That's a different narrative than is described in the linked article. I feel like it is inappropriate to try parse what did or did not happen on the BY, so I won't but I understand where the players are coming from.She admitted to consenting with 2 of them.
Her complaint apparently is about the rest.
5. At many universities, the student code of conduct forbids you from having sex with an intoxicated person (yes, this puts a different light on the college experiences of anyone over 30!)...
....you think that matters?
Option B) would not violate FERPA, but even if it did...
That's a different narrative than is described in the linked article. I feel like it is inappropriate to try parse what did or did not happen on the BY, so I won't but I understand where the players are coming from.
The video that was obtained, says otherwise. At the time, she was more than happy to accomidate the four. Hence the legal investigation was dropped.There are plenty more in depth articles.
She consented with 2 players. Other players then became involved.
UConn is ready, willing and able to step into Minnesota's shoes.
Say the word.
Not FERPA. But the Clery Act. Some of this behavior is criminalized. Graham Spanier's case still hasn't been completed.
Chris Long @ChrisLongKSTP 14m14 minutes ago
Kaler basically saying, "Look, we can talk... but we won't drop the suspensions. If that means no bowl game, you guys need to let us know."
Hahaha. So true.The absolute last thing this world needs is 3 UConn/Missouri games in three years. The last one tried to set the sport back 5 decades.
And just like that they have stopped boycotting and they are going to play.
This. Title 9 has taken away any semblance of due process for the accused. Now it's guilty until proven innocentThe issue here is a good one. Because of Title IX, the NCAA, and the way the media jumps on these stories should they be "covered up" puts universities in a tough spot. Their response following and endless string of high profile cases is to throw the accusee players under the bus. Off the team, out of school (Yale) on solely the accusation by another student before any investigation by law enforcement.
Quite frankly, it's wrong. Schools desprate to avoid being labeled as a place where high levels of crime occur do everything they can to avoid police involvement. In the past this meant covering it up. Now that Title IX is being misused to hit them over the head the reaction has been to remove the accused before any investigation occurs and even falsifying evidence when one does occur.
What they should do is not get involved at all if there is a complaint that a crime has been committed and let the police handle it.
The Rolling Stone backlash was all about this. UM is thinking we don't want to be accused of behaving like Baylor.
If 10 players were involved in a sexual assault it should come though as true or not rather quickly. Once the corrupt DA in the Duke case was out of the picture, that case collapsed immediately.
Good for the players for defending due process regardless of the outcome of the case.
To quote Emily Litella: "Never mind."
It's amazing what can be accomplished by a document placed in the public record.
The video that was obtained, says otherwise. At the time, she was more than happy to accomidate the four. Hence the legal investigation was dropped.
It's an impossible spot at this point.
In the smartphone age if I were in college I would obtain video evidence of consent.
The issue becomes they now say if someone is drinking they can't consent.
Rapists need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law - but the standard can't be regret.
Where are you getting regret? Being forcibly held down after saying you don't want sex doesn't sound like regret to me.
I wasn't talking about this case obviously.