You're wrong but...Probably says as much about Arizona as it does Kisunas.
Still, he's clearly a decent prospect who can find success wherever he lands. I'm not broken up about how things shook out, but I'm also not convinced we encouraged him to leave.
You're wrong but...
Alas, not on the Boneyard.I said I wasn't convinced, that would be tough to be wrong about.
You can say you're not convinced the earth isn't flat, it doesn't change that the earth isn't flat.About what? I said I wasn't convinced, that would be tough to be wrong about.
You can say you're not convinced the earth isn't flat, it doesn't change that the earth isn't flat.
Kisunas may end up being a good player but did we really need another project big? The fact of the matter is that there wasn't room for him. Doesn't mean we may regret not taking him if our other projects don't work out and he does.
Yep and dinosaurs aren't real because you've never run into one.I agree with the first part of your sentence.
Carlton is totally a project.It's not even that he's a project so much as you can only have so many low ceiling guys at one position. I wouldn't be shocked if he turned out to be a contributor right away, but that could still mean he's Phil Nolan. With somebody like that, you wonder how much potential is factored into the ranking.
FWIW, I don't really consider any of our big men projects besides Diarra (and Williams if you're counting him). But I do agree with you - we need a sure impact, high upside guy up front and he definitely wasn't that.
Carlton is 10 steps ahead of Kisunas offensively. There's still work to be done but offensively Carlton's floor is likely Kisunas's ceilingCarlton is totally a project.
But I never said Kisunas wasn’t a project. Carlton is offensively raw and often clueless on the defensive end. He’s got potential I agree, but he said Diarra was our only project big, which I disagreed with.Carlton is 10 steps ahead of Kisunas offensively. There's still work to be done but offensively Carlton's floor is likely Kisunas's ceiling
Carlton is totally a project.
Carlton certainly isn't a "big" big, he's maybe 6'9 but Oriakhi looks like Lou Ferrigno next to him.Carlton's primary skill is that he's big. That isn't going to change. Sure, he's raw offensively, but most big men are, just like they are clueless on defense. That describes, say, Alex Oriakhi, as well as countless other big men, perfectly, and I wouldn't consider them projects.
It's not even that he's a project so much as you can only have so many low ceiling guys at one position. I wouldn't be shocked if he turned out to be a contributor right away, but that could still mean he's Phil Nolan. With somebody like that, you wonder how much potential is factored into the ranking.
FWIW, I don't really consider any of our big men projects besides Diarra (and Williams if you're counting him). But I do agree with you - we need a sure impact, high upside guy up front and he definitely wasn't that.
Carlton certainly isn't a "big" big, he's maybe 6'9 but Oriakhi looks like Lou Ferrigno next to him.