No, he's not a good guy. That doesn't mean he's a rapist.
I agree there....and I never said he was! But his act is growing a bit old. Hey I liked the kid but he just doesn't do the right thing knowing he's in the spotlight. Hate to call him dumb but maybe it's just that - immature? More than likely somewhere between all of those, for his sake I hope so!
He knew that, the coach knew that, the world knew that since it had been announced in glaring headlines. The announcers served to whip up a public frenzy by rattling on about him being dressed out. Without two cameras being focused on him, it would have been no big deal.
Nobody said a word about Bobo Wilson who was suspended for the Oklahoma State game and traveled to Oklahoma and sat on the bench dressed out. No real drama there.
I think it was the fact that he was on the field taking his warm up reps (first team?) as if he was going to play.
Given the coach's reaction, I don't think he knew Winston was suiting up prior to being on the field.
His uniform was likely in his locker - thats not on him - if it was communicated to the equipment managers that he is NOT dressing the uniform wouldnt have been in the locker.
I dont think he broke into a closet and donned it - not that I like him - that one just isnt on him
TMZ has obtained a copy of a letter from the accuser's lawyer saying they would settle the case for a $7 million payout. I didn't want to hear any more about this story, but this does put a twist on the story.
http://www.tmz.com/2014/09/24/fsu-jameis-winston-rape-accuser-extortion-7-million/
She wasn't drunk, she didn't sustain any physical trauma, and she had semen from two men on her that night.
Irish Loop said:And therefore couldn't have been assaulted? Because there's no physical trauma? And she wasn't drunk? Wow. I just.. I don't even know what to say to that. Guess what, man. A lot of women don't put up a fight because they're scared. Way more than you think. And they aren't going to press charges because people like you are like, "See, she wasn't even drunk and didn't have any bruises, so I assume she's just a floozy." Nice.
@Irish Loop
Nice strawman. I didn't say she "couldn't" have been assaulted. Maybe instead of taking sentences out of context you could consider the entire post.
She could have been assaulted. I don't believe she was. Neither did the state attorney. Her claims that she was drunk and/or drugged weren't supported by the toxicology reports. The NYT article didn't provide the source for the claim she was bruising IIRC, but the state attorney said she wasn't bruised, IIRC. Doesn't mean she couldn't have been raped and I never said that. But I don't believe she was.
Because of guys like you who think "he's black so he must have raped that white girl" black men will always be guilty until proven innocent.
See how easy it is to make up a ridiculous statement and misrepresent someone's opinion?