There are some people in the world a who dispise and hate cheating.
Very true, but none of them are in professional sports.
There are some people in the world a who dispise and hate cheating.
Very true, but none of them are in professional sports.
Then why call someone the Deflator? Why the destroyed cell phone? Why the initial awkward, fumbling press conference before Tommy Boy was lawyered up?
How does naming someone The Deflator in a text not constitute evidence?
How does the absurdity of explaining the coining of that name as someone who was trying to lose weight not constitute evidence?
How does destroying a cell phone not constitute evidence, albeit circumstantial?
And why were the clubhouse guy and the equipment manager so effectively silenced?
Obviously you didn't read the link. The statement you make is an allegation many ran with based on pure assumptions of a (Hater's Belief) they wanted to believe.
No witness, evidence etc. and yet many with that same opinion jumped aboard and rode that hater train for ENDLESS miles. And riding still it as I see.
Saying everyone did it is another way of fostering evidence where there is none. And i assume since every QB in the league did it, then we must include the Goat as well?
There are some people in the world a who dispise and hate cheating.
Is everyone in the world a pedophile, a murderer because of some?
Should we assume all are criminals because it runs in the family? So because some chose to do seek advantages that effects my neutrality?
It all begined with an assumption. lies, allegations, and fragments of history to give it some plausibility riding on the backs of a judgemental fan base regarding those who dispise the success of the goat
But soon the real truth will be known.
Air exits everything it enters. Why is a football an exception to that rule?
Why do we ignore the fact he played better with inflated balls in the 2nd half than deflated balls in the first half?
Hmmm
No! What I said is based on conversations I have personally had with about a half dozen current and ex NFL assistant coaches.
1. The only person who ever referred to McNally as the "deflator" was McNally himself in a single text message in May of 2014. Part of the big lie in this entire process has been the notion that he was known as the deflator, when his nickname was actually "bird".
2. Brady never had any obligation to turn over his phone and the Wells Report itself says that the investigators didn't need his cell phone. Goodell raised it only after it was disclosed that Brady had replaced it. In addition, forensic examination shows that Brady turned over more than 5000 emails Brady sent/received from Sep. 2014 thru March 2015 and there was nothing relevant. The Wells investigators already had text message logs that Brady sent/received from McNally and Jastremski because they their phones.
3. The initial press conference has been discussed ad nauseous, but to reiterate, the initial allegations as reported by Mortensen were simply grossly exaggerated and it's completely unsurprising that Belichick and Brady would be at a loss to explain a 2 PSI drop.
Since you're asking questions perhaps you'd like to answer one. Why did the Wells Report deliberately leave out part of a text message exchange between McNally and Jastremski to make it appear they were discussing footballs when in fact they were discussing filming an upcoming practice in preparation for a game against the Bears?
www.csnne.com/new-England-patriots/wells-report-lost-text-messages
Or, why did the Wells Report conclude that based on text messages between McNally and Jastremski that balls had been deflated when not a single text message ever said anything about deflating footballs below the allowable PSI? In fact, the Wells Report sites a series of texts complaining that officials had grossly over inflated footballs for a Jets game as evidence that there was a deflation scheme, which is nonsensical.
No! What I said is based on conversations I have personally had with about a half dozen current and ex NFL assistant coaches.
Here is an article by Jason La Canfora basically stating the exact same thing!
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/writer...e-find-doctoring-nfl-footballs-is-nothing-new
Not exactly true.
IMHO Brady obviously had the balls doctored but so does every other QB in the NFL.
I'm never exact, but it's close enough to be a good working rule of thumb. By the way, which professional sports don't cheat, and I'm including performance enhancing drugs.
My point is plain and simple. "Not everyone cheats." So including everyone (Persons) in that box makes no sense. Your talking about the sport. I'm talking about the person.
I'm not talking about the sport itself. But I'm talking about every individual playing the sport.
Who said anything about saints, and how can you substantiate your claim that "the vast majority of professional athletes cheat"?I realize that, but I still am of the opinion that the vast majority of professional athletes 'cheat', or gain an edge as they might say. I'm curious whom you think are the saints out there.
Obviously you didn't read the link. The statement you make is an allegation many ran with based on pure assumptions of a (Hater's Belief) they wanted to believe.
No witness, evidence etc. and yet many with that same opinion jumped aboard and rode that hater train for ENDLESS miles. And riding still it as I see.
Saying everyone did it is another way of fostering evidence where there is none. And i assume since every QB in the league did it, then we must include the Goat as well?
There are some people in the world a who dispise and hate cheating.
Is everyone in the world a pedophile, a murderer because of some?
Should we assume all are criminals because it runs in the family? So because some chose to do seek advantages that effects my neutrality?
It all begined with an assumption. lies, allegations, and fragments of history to give it some plausibility riding on the backs of a judgemental fan base regarding those who dispise the success of the goat
But soon the real truth will be known.
Air exits everything it enters. Why is a football an exception to that rule?
Why do we ignore the fact he played better with inflated balls in the 2nd half than deflated balls in the first half?
Hmmm
I hear you loud and clear. But let's not forget how many times these same coaches dispise the Goat.
Not to mention how many times Bill & TB12
Defeated these assistant coaches who rather believe (The Greatest Lie Ever Told) than the truth. Lol.
and, what does that have to do with anything? Yet another poster who throws interesting, but, totally irrelevant facts, into their "arguments".Well the majority of the coaches I spoke with are with the NY Giants which is an organization that was 2-0 vs "the GOAT" in Super Bowls.
There was some kid (8th grader?) on the local news a couple of days ago that did a deflate gate science project. His conclusions were that the balls lost an average of 2 PSI after being inflated at normal room temperature and then taken to the field where temperatures were much lower. The TV station submitted his research to an MIT professor who agreed with his findings.
I think 2 PSI was the pressure difference that the NFL complained about.
Well, since your premise is that, "All NFL teams cheat" - based primarily on reports from NY Giants assistant coaches - then it appears we can conclude that the Giants must have cheated to win those 2 SB's, no?Well the majority of the coaches I spoke with are with the NY Giants which is an organization that was 2-0 vs "the GOAT" in Super Bowls.
Then why didn't the balls used by the other team deflate?
And why does everyone assume the alleged deflation was done for Brady? Just as likely it helped his receivers.
Then why didn't the balls used by the other team deflate?
And why does everyone assume the alleged deflation was done for Brady? Just as likely it helped his receivers.
and, what does that have to do with anything? Yet another poster who throws interesting, but, totally irrelevant facts, into their "arguments".
Well, since your premise is that, "All NFL teams cheat" - based primarily on reports from NY Giants assistant coaches - then it appears we can conclude that the Giants must have cheated to win those 2 SB's, no?
Conclude what you want, but I don't consider it to be cheating when both teams are doing it and thus neither team has an unfair advantage. I stated that I didn't see a problem with what Brady did in my very first post.
Who says they didn't. The officials themselves claimed they ran out of time testing the Colt's balls, which clearly suggests the Colt's balls sat in a warm locker room for up to 10 minutes while the Patriots' balls were tested and re-inflated. This topic has been covered in countless rebuttals to the Wells Report. Independent tests show that just 7-10 minutes would be sufficient to raise the PSI 0.7-1.0.