Wrong about what exactly? Do you also see some words there that I did not type? Perhaps you missed the words "before this is over"? Listen, maybe a lot of us are wrong and the other two brothers will turn out to be great basketball players, that are dynamic and can help drive the BBB brand. Maybe these three kids really will be the greatest thing of all time and we'll have to buy jerseys and shoes for our kids for the rest of our lives. I'm just having real trouble envisioning a career path for them that doesn't involve their Lonzo as the driving force for it all. Right now Lonzo is the only proven part of Lavar's "master plan", and even he is a serious work in progress. I just think what's going on here is pretty ridiculous, but it's their life to live and we are all just commenting on it.
Wrong to say that Lonzo Ball "will have to carry the financial burden for his entire family", I made that pretty clear. What you typed is an assumption. You used the words "he is going to have to". You don't know what he's going to have to do to support his "entire family" financially. Poor assumption. I don't need to read what isn't there, because what is there is an assumption.
Since you want to double down...the words "before this is over" don't add any value or context to your comment. They only make it less clear. Before what is all over? You used an ambiguous pronoun. What does "this" refer to? There's nothing in the sentence that would make it known, and you didn't quote anyone.
Even if you had clearly shown what noun "this" was referring to, it probably wouldn't change anything about the poor assumption made prior.
Maybe the other two brothers don't turn out to be great basketball players. Maybe they just get regular jobs, and are able to support themselves like most people. Would Lonzo still have to "carry the financial burden for his entire family"?
We all say stuff that's dumb, I do it once or twice a decade (okay, maybe a week) it's easier to just admit it and move on.