I am buying a house and hate the negotiating games. With that in mind - as a %, what is the average accepted off compared to asking price? 5%, 10%, ... 15%
I know it varies, but what would an average be?
Funny you ask, bought a house today.. well they signed off on our bid.. ****ty thing is we paid more then asking. Two other bids... ourr agent said 96you to 97%the of asking is what people want. But that is all up to the town
I am buying a house and hate the negotiating games. With that in mind - as a %, what is the average accepted off compared to asking price? 5%, 10%, ... 15%
I know it varies, but what would an average be?
how quickly will the uconn flag be put up over the front door? congrats on the purchase!
I am buying a house and hate the negotiating games. With that in mind - as a %, what is the average accepted off compared to asking price? 5%, 10%, ... 15%
I know it varies, but what would an average be?
Here are some random thoughts for you (I've bought many houses over the years and been involved in others).
1. Unless you know the real estate agent personally, and trust them personally, then I would treat them at arms length. Remember that they get paid by the seller, and they don't get paid unless the deal goes down. Because of that arrangement, they have a severe conflict of interest - I always advise people that real estate agents "work for the deal." Essentially it's the seller and the two agents working to get you to buy the place. Are there honest real estate agents out there who will warn you away from bad properties, advise that you offer less, thereby risking the deal, hire an inspector who is likely to turn up deal-killing issues? There might be. I haven't bumped into any. Assume that everything you tell them about your actual max bid and so on will be immediately conveyed to the other agent
Here are some random thoughts for you (I've bought many houses over the years and been involved in others).
This post is totally absurd.
1. Unless you know the real estate agent personally, and trust them personally, then I would treat them at arms length. Remember that they get paid by the seller, and they don't get paid unless the deal goes down. Because of that arrangement, they have a severe conflict of interest - I always advise people that real estate agents "work for the deal." Essentially it's the seller and the two agents working to get you to buy the place. Are there honest real estate agents out there who will warn you away from bad properties, advise that you offer less, thereby risking the deal, hire an inspector who is likely to turn up deal-killing issues? There might be. I haven't bumped into any. Assume that everything you tell them about your actual max bid and so on will be immediately conveyed to the other agent.
Real estate agents build their business on referrals, there is absolutely no reason for an agent not to work for their clients best interest, this is absurd.
2. The housing market is horrible. There are millions of shadow inventory homes that do not show up in official stats. These are houses that are owned by banks that aren't reflected in market saturation numbers. (Bank owned properties are counted in market data.) You, as a qualified buyer, are holding most of the cards. Remember that.
This really depends on what price range you are in, on the lower end there are a lot of houses on the market (quantity), there are not as many quality houses on the market on the lower end as owners are holding out on selling until market conditions improve. If you are looking in the higher end there is good value to be found.
3. If you are in a rush or if you are set on a single house, that significantly lowers your ability to get a great deal.
What does get a great deal mean? Most people buying now are getting great deals, there are motivated sellers out there
4. I'd say starting at 20% under asking wouldn't be outrageous - they could always counter offer - 95% of people won't be so offended that they wouldn't consider a second, higher offer. In this economy, I'd stay away from any home that has multiple bids on it. Why get in a bidding war when the market is this wide open for buyers?
Pricing is not based on a certain percent, it's based on what comparble properties recently sold and what the current state of the market is, basing it an 10, 15 or 20 percent mey be too high, it may actually be 30 percent.
5. Remember that selling agents will often schedule showings that overlap to give the illusion of demand. I had that happen once. A house had been on the market for 3 months. I go to look at it. Another buyer is just leaving. Lame. If you feel panicy, or if you make a panic bid, you lose. I'd recommend against making any offer that you haven't sat on for a day.
What agent has this much time, "illussions of demand" really? If the property is nice then there will be a lot of action on it, if the buyer wants to keep looking, then they may miss out.
6. Don't pay for a bank appraisal until after you do your home inspection. Agents and bankers will push for you to get the appraisal "ASAP" after a signed deal is in place. Why? All that does is commit more of your money. Once you pop down the 400 for an appraisal, it's a sunk cost and if it turns out that the inspection turns up a deal killer, you're out the appraisal money on a house you never bought.
Appraisals are done to determine if the price of the property appropriate, if you agree to pay X amount, the bank wants to make sure it's actually worth what you want to pay, basically it's a way for the bank to protect it's investment.
7. YOU pick the inspector. Do some research and find a completely independent inspector. DO NOT use one suggested by either agent, as agents generally pick inspectors who will green light a house. You want somebody to flag everything, no somebody who is going to ignore issues to make sure that the deal goes through.
The bank selects the appraiser to ensure the transaction is at arms length.
8. We're in a very poor economy. Banks are not lending. Unoccupied houses are sitting vacant. You can score a great deal on a house, but you have to be patient, and not be set on one house. It's like the person who starts the conversation with a car dealer with, "I have to have a red car." EEEEEEEEE. Not good.
It's not that banks don't want to lend, it's that underwriting requirements are more strict, banks hire agents to sell their REO assets.
9. Put as little down as possible. Generally, the real estate contracts used by NAR folks are garbage and give you the right to get out for silly little reasons. They're essentially drafted to protect the NAR agents and the deal. They don't want litigation, so they draft the things so that buyers can walk away for little or no reason, thereby freeing up the house for sale and allowing the buyer to leave with his money to go buy another house.
Again, this is I don't understand the logic here. If you can put as little as you can, that's always good, but underwriting standards now more than ever require qualified buyer to put more money down, if you qualify for FHA or CHFA they can help with down payment assistance.
Good luck. You can get a great deal on a house - do your research, don't be in a hurry, and remember that it's a very bear market.
Again, there is a big difference between Price and Value, you pay for what you get./quote]
Absolutely no reason? You said you're an agent, right? A buying agent doesn't get paid unless his client buys a house. The amount of time and energy that a buying agent must expend to get paid increases with each house he/she shows his client. Ergo, the buying agent has a tremendous conflict of interest. Same is true of a selling agent - the higher the starting price, the more time and effort is required to get paid. First house I sold the local agent in CT told me to put it on the market for 145. We had paid 125ish a few years before. Hot market, several upgrades. I told him to list it at 170 or pound sand. He said OK. We sold it for 165 four weeks later. Of course, at 145 I'm sure it would have sold in a week.Real estate agents build their business on referrals, there is absolutely no reason for an agent not to work for their clients best interest, this is absurd.

S O.O. NAbsolutely no reason? You said you're an agent, right? A buying agent doesn't get paid unless his client buys a house. The amount of time and energy that a buying agent must expend to get paid increases with each house he/she shows his client. Ergo, the buying agent has a tremendous conflict of interest. Same is true of a selling agent - the higher the starting price, the more time and effort is required to get paid.
It's all relative, you have clients that are buying and clients that are selling, there's an ebb and flow to real estate, just like any commission based endevour. I don't know why you have such difficulty grasping that.
First house I sold the local agent in CT told me to put it on the market for 145. We had paid 125ish a few years before. Hot market, several upgrades. I told him to list it at 170 or pound sand. He said OK. We sold it for 165 four weeks later. Of course, at 145 I'm sure it would have sold in a week.
Big deal, so now you're the expert.
If you don't understand that conflict of interest, then I direct you to Upton Sinclair - "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!"
There's no conflict of interest, no one forces the client to sign the agreement, there are people that buy and sell houses without the use of a realtor, so your quote by Sinclair doesn't apply, sorry.
The 6% commission paid by the Seller, split 3% to both the Buying Agent and the Selling Agent, is a relic that needs to be buried in the back yard.S O.O. N
Most transactions today are at a 5% level, again, people have the ability to go there own way.
Hmmm...I've been through the house buying and selling rodeo a few times and I thought dapriest had some pretty valid suggestions and observations.
Zillow is really flawed. It is useful for whatever facts it reports, but its estimates of value are worthless imo.
And it was USAA which is probably the best financial company you could possibly deal with....
Hmmm...I've been through the house buying and selling rodeo a few times and I thought dapriest had some pretty valid suggestions and observations.
I do agree with Suzy that, for most people, emotion inevitably plays a big part, just as it does in any decision that is based on attraction. The thing to remember is that there is always another house. We had at least three "dream house" deals fall through at various stages--including two that cratered while under contract--and, like Suzy, we've gone on to see that it was very much for the best (for us) in each instance.
I totally agree never to trust any real estate agent. I've known more than I can count, have used several, and many are very good friends. None of them ever did anything whatsoever of value for us in the process when we were buyers. Count on doing all your own leg work, including finding your own houses. Think of them merely as a necessary part of the process that you will need to provide you access to the listings you want to view. Sign up only for a limited representation for the day that you view the house that they have listed.
Zillow is really flawed. It is useful for whatever facts it reports, but its estimates of value are worthless imo.