Zorro
Nuestro Zorro Amigo
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 17,920
- Reaction Score
- 15,754
I don't really mind (much) the use of me in place of I, because that has become so ingrained in the language as she is spoke that it seems almost natural; "See you later. Me and Jennifer are going to the mall". Much worse, to me, is the use of "I" as an object, because it sounds stilted and affected. "It was a learning experience for the team and I.", "Coach was really tough on Suzie and I.", although even that seems to be gaining usage. One really can't be too hard-assed as to what is and is not acceptable; the Academie Francaise has tried that without apparent success. And, as has been discussed on this board before, there are situations in which "proper", prescriptive English just would not work effectively; "I can't get any satisfaction", "to go boldly where no man has gone before", "I am not misbehaving", "You aren't anything other than a hound dog" come to mind. Every generation since language was invented has deplored its deterioration. (I can't cite data, but I believe that this is probably true.)
The great linguist, Ted Higgs opined, correctly, I think, that the true purpose of grammar was NOT to help one to be understood, but rather to avoid misunderstanding. And no one is going to be misled into thinking that the Mick means that he is unable to obtain a zero level of satisfaction.
The great linguist, Ted Higgs opined, correctly, I think, that the true purpose of grammar was NOT to help one to be understood, but rather to avoid misunderstanding. And no one is going to be misled into thinking that the Mick means that he is unable to obtain a zero level of satisfaction.
