Things can turn around quickly if we find a play maker at QB and our coach decides to prioritize winning and game planning. BC is a good example of a quick turnaround. They were as bad as we are under their previous coach just two years ago. I do think Diaco is recruiting well (as well as can be expected).
This is only partially true. While it is true that BC witnessed a quick turn around, their program was nowhere near the depths that uconn was/is (when Diaco took over). The first glaring difference, is that Addazio was able to transform BC in his first year, obviously something Diaco failed at miserably. But even with Spaziani, they still recruited decent pieces here and there, and despite being thin at a number of spots, Addazio took over a very senior team with respectable, ACC level pieces, which helped in his transition.
The biggest difference in the two situations, is that Addazio was able to win immediately with a quarterback who was the polar opposite of one that fits his system. He was able to scheme around any short comings/scheme differences. Diaco has failed at that so far which has to leave major questions about his offensive management.