- Joined
- Feb 4, 2019
- Messages
- 947
- Reaction Score
- 1,421
Will it come down to the Rueck technical and a four point turn?

I'm not sure. Their 8 losses are the 2 closest PAC12 losses to #3 Oregon, 2 3 pt losses to #4 Stanford, #8 UCLA in OT on their court, split #11 Arizona, split a ranked ASU, and one "bad" 6 pt loss at USC. Other good wins include over #12 Depaul and #23 Missouri State. As long as they win their next 4 games, even if they lose that 2nd PAC12 tourney game it will be to a top 8 team. I still say they host. I still don't see another 4 seed who would be as deserving as OSU.I'd say no. Tonight was their chance to salvage things, not getting it done. Unless they get hot in Vegas and beat a couple of the top half teams from the conference.
Unequivocally when you look at their conference losses.@triaddukefan can I say Oregon St. is without question the best 7-8 in conference team in the country?![]()
I'm not sure. Their 8 losses are the 2 closest PAC12 losses to #3 Oregon, 2 3 pt losses to #4 Stanford, #8 UCLA in OT on their court, split #11 Arizona, split a ranked ASU, and one "bad" 6 pt loss at USC. Other good wins include over #12 Depaul and #23 Missouri State. As long as they win their next 4 games, even if they lose that 2nd PAC12 tourney game it will be to a top 8 team. I still say they host. I still don't see another 4 seed who would be as deserving as OSU.
Maddie is not Brown.
Agree on both counts.Maddie is just not a Pac 12 starter caliber player, but what options do they have? Neither are Thropay or Morris, and 4 guards probably isn't gonna work either.
I thought Goodman finally got her season back on track, but she's absolutely disappeared again.
Not helping his persona of being measured and controlled outside of Beaver nation

@triaddukefan can I say Oregon St. is without question the best 7-8 in conference team in the country?![]()
not only their competition but also pass the eye test - was at game last night. Slocum phenomenal, even with her elbows.Without a doubt
I read that another Cardinal fan who posted on The Cardboard thought OSU was overly aggressive last night and threw a few elbows. I know that Stanford plays tight defense and gets into the offensive players frequently with effective double teams. That is a calling card of playing for Tara. I didn't see (and neither did the refs) anything egregious last night. I saw Dodson got hit by Jones with an inadvertent blow, but the refs reviewed and concluded it wasn't a foul.not only their competition but also pass the eye test - was at game last night. Slocum phenomenal, even with her elbows.
I saw the game a little bit differently from my admittedly orange-colored bias. Williams was bodied and bounced off Slocum to the floor in the first half when Williams got up tight on Slocum. The Hulls are very skilled at doing just that and drawing charges. Slocum was called for one of those two fouls as she fought through a moving Stanford screen. Slocum raised that issue as soon as that call was made. I didn't see any elbows extended by Slocum on either of those defensive fouls. I would agree that the refs likely called those two fouls quickly on Slocum to send a message.Hmm, I think I'd split the difference. I think it was pretty physical in the first half, especially when Slocum outright shoved Williams to the floor. But early in the second half the refs called two back-to-back fouls on Slocum for twice grabbing/elbowing Williams, and I think that plus a quick foul on Jones calmed things down. The second half seemed much less physical, overall, than the first, and I suspect the refs came out of the half intending to tamp things down a bit.