I agree but with Diggins both Hurley and Moore were really coaching him hard on defense. He missed a few rotations and it led to an open shot. Also he gambled a few times an was called for fouls. It’s understandable from the time he has missed. Almost every timeout Moore was in his earSome other general takeaways:
-I really liked how Gaffney pushed the pace off of defensive rebounds, looking for fast break opportunities
-Diggins looked really good especially considering he’s apparently missed a bunch of time with a bum knee. Looked comfy and in control running offense most of the time and also played pretty good tight 3/4 court D
-Whaley looked strong on D (no surprise) but was very quiet on offense
-AJ was a beast on D, pushed pace well, made some really great dishes in the paint that were mishandled by the receiver at times
-Sanogo is gonna be a handful for opponents
Total dick comment by RJ saying blue team should he beating white team.
"That's the depth that we have on our team," said Cole when asked about the White team winning. "That goes to show we're a very talented team and it's not always going to be the Blue team beating the White team, as much as we should be beating them. They're talented as well. It's not going to be a cakewalk."
Need ball handling and shooting. I'm stuck with no way Cole or Sanogo are not in starting line up. I'm not the biggest Cole fan due to his lack of athleticism and size but he can shoot, and has Hurley's confidence. I wish there was a better known solution at the PG but there isn't someone who is a bit bigger and faster, so I can live with Cole.
Total dick comment by RJ saying blue team should he beating white team.
"That's the depth that we have on our team," said Cole when asked about the White team winning. "That goes to show we're a very talented team and it's not always going to be the Blue team beating the White team, as much as we should be beating them. They're talented as well. It's not going to be a cakewalk."
In a very predictable way, and without reading too much into it, it’s not a good sign. We knew we had a roster full of good, Big East players, but the fear was we didn’t have players who would step up and lead us to the second weekend. And what we saw tonight is that what look to be the starters were no better than the bench.
The roll players and the depth are all there. Who wants to be the Huskies one or two alpha dogs?
Seemed honest to me. Starters should typically beat the bench.
I think it's pretty obvious those leaders will be Jackson and Sanogo. Sanogo just didn't shoot well today.In a very predictable way, and without reading too much into it, it’s not a good sign. We knew we had a roster full of good, Big East players, but the fear was we didn’t have players who would step up and lead us to the second weekend. And what we saw tonight is that what look to be the starters were no better than the bench.
The roll players and the depth are all there. Who wants to be the Huskies one or two alpha dogs?
Overall disappointing night for starters in blue. DH at one point said it best "Blue you're old and stale like a gross stale bagel." Cole was a non factor throughout and didn't attempt anything outside.............
Andre Jackson looked outstanding, great facilitator and looks improved from outside. Based Off scrimmage I'd much rather him with the ball than Cole facilitating offense. .................
Some other general takeaways:
-I really liked how Gaffney pushed the pace off of defensive rebounds, looking for fast break opportunities
-Diggins looked really good especially considering he’s apparently missed a bunch of time with a bum knee. Looked comfy and in control running offense most of the time and also played pretty good tight 3/4 court D
-Whaley looked strong on D (no surprise) but was very quiet on offense
-AJ was a beast on D, pushed pace well, made some really great dishes in the paint that were mishandled by the receiver at times
You’re trying too hard.