I give dapriest credit for calling it as he sees it. I don't see it the same as he does here, but I understand exactly what he is saying and I am sure there are many who do agree with him. I think many of his points are legitimate and not intended to be racist or otherwise offending. People should be capable of having these conversations without assuming that those who see it differently are necessarily motivated by bad intentions. Assuming arguendo that his is a mindset formed by regional prejudices (which I have no basis to do), do you think that mindset is more likely to change when people call each other inflammatory names, or when one side simply observes that the thing they thought mattered doesn't seem to bother others whose opinions they respect?
Wonderfully stated. Unfortunately not heeded by some.
It is our nature to judge things by the cover. We make quick impressions of someone and relate those impressions to our experiences including whatever ideas we accept from others about what is good or bad. I'm no different than anyone else. It's prudent to make quick assessments. When we're put in a situation that is unknown it's important to look for cues to determine if the situation is dangerous as opposed to safe. Most higher organisms including humans are wired this way. But that should only be the beginning of our examination if we're not in a life threatening situation. Unfortunately there will be some people who will think KO's speech will reflect badly on UConn, particularly because of the APR issue.
I prefer to look at someone's character as opposed to skills in speech or how one dresses. Those things are important but they don't hold a candle to someone who is dedicated, loyal, trustworthy, has the ability to relate to others, has a strong desire to develop others, has a hunger to learn and improve, and so on. I'm strongly in KO's camp because he oozes those qualities. These attributes served the previous coach pretty darn well and I feel KO is an upgrade regarding his ability to relate to others but, like JC, isn't phony about it. I don't know anything about KO's ability to coach. He's an unwritten book, but he has all the qualifications to become an outstanding coach imo.
It would be a shame if any of the powers to be fall into the trap that says a person needs to be a good spokesperson to represent the institution properly because I think that the majority of people who would follow KO would decide he is a class act.