You want officiating to be more consistent? Show them the money.
As we know, the NCAA has no "control" over officials until the NCAA tournament. Until then, it's the conferences.
The NCAA Rules Committee (Man, it was a pain to try and track down the members:
COMMITTEE SELECTION LINKS: A JSP APPLICATION) id's points of emphasis, changes, etc. They're decided on and then sent out to the conferences/teams via PDFS/Links/Videos and carrier pigeons.
Officials review the changes. Remember, they're independent contractors, paying a hunk of taxes, paying for their insurance, and working a gig that keeps them away from home and family for several months. They're not paid for any time outside the games for which they're contracted.
If they're lucky, they're on a roster of a pro-active conference supervisor who PAYS THEM to come to a professional development session during which questions are asked, implementation challenges are reviewed etc. Of course, the trick is these are not "intellectual" changes. They are changes that, more often than not, impact how you call a live game. So, how does one train THAT?
I have some thoughts. If anyone has encountered the word "scalability" you know what's coming next.
1) The NCAA hires Regional Rule Trainers. They're incredibly skilled deliverers of professional development. They can talk "what ifs" and they can model. AND they're REALLY good at navigating politics. OMG THE POLITICS!!!
Their job is, as a cohort, make sure they're consistent in their messaging and expectations of rules/officials.
They also:
a) meet with their regional conference supervisors (it would be cool if it were DI, 2 & 3) 3 times a years to introduce, problem solve, discuss and implement rule changes. Make sure the SUPERVISORS are consistent in their messaging and expectations of rules/officials ('cause every coordinator has their own opinions on how a game should be reffed AND have coaches with their own opinions)
b) They run and/or hire great facilitators (paid) to host Refereeing Camps/Trainings that officials are PAID to attend (travel/food/housing) I'd start smallish - a camp of "senior" officials mixed with "up and comers" that were nominated by Conference Supervisors or "senior" officials. These sessions include basketball players willing to be referee-guinea pigs.
CONFERENCES NEED TO PONY UP!!
When I spoke with Barb Jacobs back in the day, she said she was given a budget, out of which she was expected to pay herself, hire officials (travel/food/housing) as well as in-game/post game reviewers. Would love to know what the top conferences are doing these days, 'cause you know the mid-majors and such are doing a FRACTION of that.
So, beyond hiring officials for games (travel/housing/food) and post-game reviews, conferences need to
i. Pay officials for conference focused training sessions: Professional Development, one-on-one mentoring, workshops with coaches and players, etc
ii. Hire and train and PAY an enough experienced eyes to get out to games and do observations/reports and feedback.
iii. Have trainings to build a professional relationship between observers and officials - discuss feedback processes etc.
iiii. Have on going meetings with the observes to discuss what they're seeing, questions that have come up etc. Share that work with officials and coaches.
Oh, there's so much more... lol.
All this is a logistical nightmare and would cost a ton of $$$. BUT, it would increase the trained pool of officials.
That being said, I agree with Tom. Folks are NEVER going to stop complaining about officials. BUT, boy I would love there to be "So you want to be an official" sessions for fans.
snrtle
Last note: When I was writing about the game, there was a woman who took over as the NCAA Senior Official Supervisor person. Lots of energy, lots of ideas, lots of vision.
They left. And I'm SURE it was because people TALK about wanting to change, but personalities and egos (and logistics and time and money) get in the way.
Also, we know referees are treated with contempt and derision by fans, coaches and (following their example) players. Why anyone would WANT to be a referee is beyond me. So, what does that say about the folks who stick around?