Better offense makes game watchable. Which should lead to bigger crowds. BIG 12, are you listening?
What a time to be alive.
But seriously, it does sound like Diaco, Thomas, and Myers have all speculated that the offense seems like it's doing better even in practice. And it's not like they're playing against some terrible UCF-led defense out there.
I imagine we won't see anything too crazy for Maine, but I'd love to see us push them around and get some playaction going. If we can just give Newsome a bit of room, I think the kid's a playermaker and could really open things up for us.
Noel Thomas' quote that they're going to do 'what works' is telling. In the past, we've seen the O try to establish the run regardless of whether or not it's working. Perhaps this year we'll take a more Belichickian approach to offense--take what the defense gives us from week to week, being neither a pass happy or run happy team.
I want to see the real Ron Jon, the one who freshman year looked somewhat like a Donald Brown.
I want to see the real Ron Jon, the one who freshman year looked somewhat like a Donald Brown.
I want to see the real Ron Jon, the one who freshman year looked somewhat like a Donald Brown.
A throwback to our days of thrashing these schools would be refreshing. Say 45-3?? Don't want to be too greedy.Maine needs to get beat so bad that navy feels it. Hope this is more than the usual summer camp feeling of domination !
They didn't have an offense to overcome TOs and but coaches are TO adverse..My attitude remain "show me." Diaco has been very TO adverse. I suspect that will remain his priority.
I think he better be concerned.. we have adequate depth at RB now... some hungry pups behind he and Newsome that have already excelled early on. Vickers and Hopkins are proto-types that have legit ability...Getting a tad concerned about his fumbling. Believe this is the second one that "stopped" a drive that I have read about.
Coaches in general are TO adverse but Diaco is very much so. Let's just say more than most. I recall one game after an INT where he ran the ball almost every play for the rest of the game.They didn't have an offense to overcome TOs and but coaches are TO adverse..
It was usf I believe a int , fumble and intentional grounding on the first few drives and he ran the ball the rest of the day .Coaches in general are TO adverse but Diaco is very much so. Let's just say more than most. I recall one game after an INT where he ran the ball almost every play for the rest of the game.
I think he better be concerned.. we have adequate depth at RB now... some hungry pups behind he and Newsome that have already excelled early on. Vickers and Hopkins are proto-types that have legit ability...
2 things:
We do not have adequate RB depth under any reasonable definition of depth.
More importantly, do not EVER use the term prototype to describe any of our players.
I believe it. Just for the simple fact Samra is gone will help immensely. Guy was a sieve and got Shirreffs and Co. hammered all season long.
If anybody is interested go back and watch the first 45 min of both the USF and Navy games and see how bad he played in those 2 games alone. A lot of our problems on O stemmed from him and on Defense a lot of our problems stemmed from Adams taking terrible angles and missing open field tackles and Stewart not staying home.
I think the O will be better since we are replacing our worst lineman with arguably our best and I think the defense will be better too because hopefully the Watkins and whoever is rotating in at LB doesn't try to be a hero and just does their job.