Now if I understand this right, it was "1" practice. How often have we all seen a game, and thought, "That player isn't very good" , or conversely, "Wow! That kid is a player!" Then after a half or whole season worth of games, the resume demonstrated otherwise.
My gosh! It was an open practice to see all the players, minus 1, and this thread has turned into a Mahaney Requiem.
He's learning a new system, and maybe he just had an off day. Give it a bunch of "real" games before we start drawing any conclusions on what we have with Mahoney and the rest of the team.
With that said, I loved reading most of the observations and wished I was there. There was a time when Hooper and I would sneak into Gampel and catch a closed practice...we had gotten to know a couple of the assistant coaches who would vouch for us so that we wouldn't get kicked out...and get a preseason look at the team. What we often saw those days wasn't always indictitve of how the team and players turned out through the balance of the upcoming season.
Granted this is a forum for opinions regardless if we agree with them or not, so let's give it some time and see if the Mahaney low bar projections or high bar ones turn out to be the case. Based on the little I know about him and his resume, I think he'll have some up and down games through the first half of the BE season as he adjusts to UConn's offensive and defensive schemes as well as the physicality of BE play, but will turn out to be an import part of our Three-peat success. Let's revisit this in 6 to 7 months from now when Aidan and his teammates have a solid body of work under their belts.