- Joined
- Jan 13, 2014
- Messages
- 9,875
- Reaction Score
- 29,429
70 in February is pretty nice...I'm still glad I don't live in Phoenix.
70 in February is pretty nice...I'm still glad I don't live in Phoenix.
I have no reason to doubt these figures, but I think there have been more frequent and on average stronger storms in the past few decades. So I wonder if the average yearly cost of damage is not on an increasing trend lately.Here are the ten "worst" hurricanes in recorded U.S. history, based on the estimated damage that the same storm would cause in 2017:
Rank Date Event Category 2017 insured loss 1 Sep. 18, 1926 Great Miami Hurricane 4 $128 2 Sep. 17, 1928 Okeechobee Hurricane 4 78 3 Aug. 29, 2005 Hurricane Katrina 3 (2) 64 4 Sep. 17, 1947 1947 Fort Lauderdale Hurricane 4 62 5 Sep. 9, 1965 Hurricane Betsy 4 (2) 57 6 Aug. 24, 1992 Hurricane Andrew 5 56 7 Sep. 10, 1960 Hurricane Donna 4 50 8 Sep. 21, 1938 The Great New England Hurricane 3 50 9 Sep. 9, 1900 1900 Galveston Hurricane 4 49 10 Aug. 17, 1915 1915 Galveston Hurricane
Interesting that only two have occurred in the past 50 years and only one in the past 25 years.
We've been lucky that, other than Katrina, we haven't had a major hurricane directly hit a major city. Sandy isn't included in that chart because it was technically no longer a tropical cyclone at landfall. Sandy had been only a category 1 hurricane yet caused almost $70 billion in damage in 2012 dollars. Imagine a large Cat 3 on the same path.I have no reason to doubt these figures, but I think there have been more frequent and on average stronger storms in the past few decades. So I wonder if the average yearly cost of damage is not on an increasing trend lately.