- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 6,455
- Reaction Score
- 22,017
I just don’t understand what’s going on. Is targeting your future point guard at age 17, recruiting him, developing him, and winning with him some sort of a thing that matters? Like that’s the only proper way to do it? In the portal era? Just point guards and no other positions?Different situation. Newton was an established experienced D1 player. And a scorer. And about 2 years shy of collecting social security, LOL,. Different worjingvwith him than with a kid just out of high school. Less maturity, less experience in the game, less developed physically, too.
Because the starting point guards in the Final Four started at Tulane, FIU, Oklahoma and Iona, but you won’t find those teams playing (ok, you can nit pick James vs. Proctor - Pettiford comes off the bench - but you get the, uh, point - heh heh). The point guard from Iona had a dramatic comeback to beat the point guard from Howard, and the point guard from Ohio U had a bad day and didn’t make it back for a second year in a row.
Newton was a former zero star recruit who was playing losing, inefficient basketball for a bottom tier AAC team and left a first-team All-American with two national championship rings.
I’m not putting an asterisk on that.
Last edited: