- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 23,974
- Reaction Score
- 20,988
The article is not completely fair or completely true, but I take my hat off to the writer -- it is very funny.
The article is not completely fair or completely true, but I take my hat off to the writer -- it is very funny.
The article is not completely fair or completely true, but I take my hat off to the writer -- it is very funny.
Wow, how's life in the big-time Randy?http://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...tered-waters/2012/02/16/gIQArzdAIR_story.html
I heard Joe D mention this on the way home. Sally Jenkins, of all people, tears a piece off RE.
Got you. As a hater, I've moved on. You can't help but rubber neck at the wreck sometimes, but it ain't even fun watching him duck up anymore. We need a big year of our own coming up. Here is hoping Chandler Whitmer is the answer to our problems, and if he ain't, that Mike Nebrich has improved by leaps and bounds.
People talk about edsall because there's nothing else to talk about...team went 5-7
We went 5-7 and there's nothing else to talk about? LOLPeople talk about edsall because there's nothing else to talk about...team went 5-7
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...21/maryland-edsall-obrien-transfer/index.html
SI chimes in on the O'Brien transfer situation. It puts a new twist on the subject that is a bit of a defense of Edsall. It suggests that the AD may be behind the Vandy exclusion.
Check out the charming first paragraph:
My media colleagues seem to be split in their opinions of Maryland football coach Randy Edsall. One camp thinks Edsall is a self-serving, hypocritical turd. The other camp thinks he is a shameless, ruthless disgrace to his profession.
That is a great article. Not a good one, but a great one. And it will be a shame if people who read it can only focus on the parts about Randy Edsall.