Notre Dame 2025-2026 Regular-Season Thread. | Page 3 | The Boneyard
.-.

Notre Dame 2025-2026 Regular-Season Thread.

ND Beats USC at Home on Hidalgo Jumper with 1.9 Seconds Left
This wasn't pretty by any means, but ND got a much-needed victory, holding the Trojans to 8 points in the fourth quarter (while scoring 15 themselves). Overall, USC had 21 turnovers and 16 of those were steals by the Irish. Hannah HIdalgo led the way with 5 steals, Cassan Prosper had 3 and KK Bransford had 4 steals and 3 blocks. Hidalgo led ND with 22, Vanessa DeJesus had 13 (11 in the first half) and Bransford 11, most of which came in the 2nd half.
Here's the winning shot:

Excellent that ND took down #11 USC. A win is a win. But the loss at Michigan has me very confused. It seems this ND team is still learning to play as a team, or USC hasn't figured out how to play together, or nobody has any idea how good or bad they are yet.

Imo it will take ten or so more games to get a better read. The next game is Central Michigan which ND has better win, then it gets interesting with Mississippi then Florida State (a conference game in early December??). In summary glad ND won but I don't know what's going on yet, I should have just said that.
 
Last edited:
The early season schedule is propped up by erroneous rankings.
To wit:
Duke was preseason rank #7 due to their Elite 8 run last year and bring in a good recruiting class but they lost Okananwa and then lost to Baylor who got a big rank bump without really proving anything- they lost this week to Iowa. Duke has now lost to WVU and USF so how good is that Baylor win?
NC State beat an over ranked #8 Tennessee but then lost to SoCal but the voters incorrectly jumped SC up way too much. SoCal got stomped at home vs SCar and now lost at ND. NC State has since lost to TCU at home, so were they worthy of that preseason #9 rank and the boost it gave SoCal and TCU?
My point is the early (and sometimes bad rankings) over inflate wins. ND will undoubtedly get a bump for beating what we now know is a merely good SoCal team.

Due to the shear number of shabby OOC games with the better teams stomping mid major teams by 50+ points, the voters over rank teams, beating up on Akron, Chicago State and FDU did ND no favors when they played a legit P4 team.
ND plays Central Michigan next, then Ole Miss, FSU, Moorhead and JMU so that’s 1 good P4 team, one mediocre P4, and 3 mid majors with significantly less talent. I just hope the voters use some better assessment skills, not only for ranking ND but for many of the early over ranked teams.

The gist is ND won tonight but is really SoCal top 11 team? I think not….but hey, Irish fans tout this win all you can as those who pay attention know this will be a down year for you….
 
ND Beats USC at Home on Hidalgo Jumper with 1.9 Seconds Left
This wasn't pretty by any means, but ND got a much-needed victory, holding the Trojans to 8 points in the fourth quarter (while scoring 15 themselves). Overall, USC had 21 turnovers and 16 of those were steals by the Irish. Hannah HIdalgo led the way with 5 steals, Cassan Prosper had 3 and KK Bransford had 4 steals and 3 blocks. Hidalgo led ND with 22, Vanessa DeJesus had 13 (11 in the first half) and Bransford 11, most of which came in the 2nd half.
Here's the winning shot:

That was a great game! I loved the back and forth how both teams competed. Congrats on the win.
 
The early season schedule is propped up by erroneous rankings.
To wit:
Duke was preseason rank #7 due to their Elite 8 run last year and bring in a good recruiting class but they lost Okananwa and then lost to Baylor who got a big rank bump without really proving anything- they lost this week to Iowa. Duke has now lost to WVU and USF so how good is that Baylor win?
NC State beat an over ranked #8 Tennessee but then lost to SoCal but the voters incorrectly jumped SC up way too much. SoCal got stomped at home vs SCar and now lost at ND. NC State has since lost to TCU at home, so were they worthy of that preseason #9 rank and the boost it gave SoCal and TCU?
My point is the early (and sometimes bad rankings) over inflate wins. ND will undoubtedly get a bump for beating what we now know is a merely good SoCal team.

Due to the shear number of shabby OOC games with the better teams stomping mid major teams by 50+ points, the voters over rank teams, beating up on Akron, Chicago State and FDU did ND no favors when they played a legit P4 team.
ND plays Central Michigan next, then Ole Miss, FSU, Moorhead and JMU so that’s 1 good P4 team, one mediocre P4, and 3 mid majors with significantly less talent. I just hope the voters use some better assessment skills, not only for ranking ND but for many of the early over ranked teams.

The gist is ND won tonight but is really SoCal top 11 team? I think not….but hey, Irish fans tout this win all you can as those who pay attention know this will be a down year for you….
Given that most of the folks who post in this thread are "those who pay attention," perhaps the "tout this win all you can" is a bit sardonic by half, but point taken. 😎 for the uninitiated.

  • Your point about erroneous (or inflated/misplaced) rankings is spot on.
  • In the case of many teams like USC or Notre Dame, there are also a lot of new players to mesh and gel. You can see it on the floor. USC has talent, but they're missing a -- say -- Kayleigh Heckel to make sense of it all.
  • ND has no post presence or outside shooting, so they're best relying on chaos so their three athletes (Hidalgo, Bransford, Prosper) can get to the hoop or help in other ways. I, for one, am on record everywhere as calling this a "bridge year" and I'll stick with it. It was still an entertaining win.
 
The early season schedule is propped up by erroneous rankings.
To wit:
Duke was preseason rank #7 due to their Elite 8 run last year and bring in a good recruiting class but they lost Okananwa and then lost to Baylor who got a big rank bump without really proving anything- they lost this week to Iowa. Duke has now lost to WVU and USF so how good is that Baylor win?
NC State beat an over ranked #8 Tennessee but then lost to SoCal but the voters incorrectly jumped SC up way too much. SoCal got stomped at home vs SCar and now lost at ND. NC State has since lost to TCU at home, so were they worthy of that preseason #9 rank and the boost it gave SoCal and TCU?
My point is the early (and sometimes bad rankings) over inflate wins. ND will undoubtedly get a bump for beating what we now know is a merely good SoCal team.

Due to the shear number of shabby OOC games with the better teams stomping mid major teams by 50+ points, the voters over rank teams, beating up on Akron, Chicago State and FDU did ND no favors when they played a legit P4 team.
ND plays Central Michigan next, then Ole Miss, FSU, Moorhead and JMU so that’s 1 good P4 team, one mediocre P4, and 3 mid majors with significantly less talent. I just hope the voters use some better assessment skills, not only for ranking ND but for many of the early over ranked teams.

The gist is ND won tonight but is really SoCal top 11 team? I think not….but hey, Irish fans tout this win all you can as those who pay attention know this will be a down year for you….
I agree with your ranking thoughts. Pre-season rankings are hard to get right, because you truly never know. I don't know or care what ND will be ranked after this game, just glad they won. We know this year will be a little rough, but it's good to see improvements from last weekend. That's all you can ask for.
 
Really happy with the game! A few thoughts:
1. This team pulled out a win and still hasn't fully incorporated Moore and Cowles yet. Moore specifically I think can provide some outside shooting this team needs, and she can score. Cowles is the low post presence we need. She was posting hard yesterday, but we didn't get her the ball.
2. Proud of Hannah for the end of the game yesterday. She had a a couple of drives she dished off that I thimk last week she could've forced up. And assist to KK and an open 3 to Prosper that missed. She hit the big shot that counted though (which was very contested by Smith).
3. KK! She was pretty quiet all game until the 4th. That's when I started to notice her physicality. She had a good defensive play where she forced Smith to fade away in the post. Smith is physical as they come too. She muscled up some tough shots too. Wish she had a little bit more confidence in the 3 ball, because she had a couple open looks. I hope this game is a building block for her.
3. VDJ, I wasn't expecting her to be the primary defender on Davidson. She did a pretty good job. Her 3's in the first half were important. We really need her experience and ball handling to keep Hannah fresh. She is another feisty defender that was causing turnovers.
4. The defense was great. Hannah and VDJ were harassing the ball handlers in the second half. KK and Prosper were then blowing up the passes. Who needs half court offense when you can get into transition? Well defense is this teams best offense. I'm always a half court offense complainer, but they were trying some different looks. They were responding better to Hannah getting hedged on screens.
 
.-.
I certainly hope it isn't a three-year rebuild. Only four of the relevant talent is coming back next year to join a top-notch recruiting class. Or, if you prefer, that class will join senior Hannah Hidalgo and KK Bransford, as well as Leah Macy. I'm not basing the season on a blow-out loss to a team that returned 70% of their scoring and caught the Irish unprepared for the level of play needed.

Like you, I'll look for growth this year, but I think Bransford is a genuine starter in most programs and Hannah is still Hannah, who will do awfully well with players like Jacy Abii, Macy and Amari Byles.
I was at the game last night. So, it was my first “look test”.

The defensive effort was there all game, which is the reason we won. I was pleasantly surprised how we responded down 11 in the 3rd. I thought it was over, as up to that point USC looked like the more talented and more athletic team. They look like a UCONN team-lean, quick, good shooters.

Bransford was really disappointing in the first half to the point that I thought she was winded and out of shape, but she looked like a completely different player in the 2nd half running the court, hitting open shots and playing a good full court game. Perhaps by habit, and being out for a year, she still goes inside and picks up her dribble like she’s back in high school and she can just muscle through. She gets in trouble when she’s surrounded by taller players in the paint and picking up her dribble.

Prosper gives great effort, but will never be a consistent scorer. She’s so physical on the defensive side, and can contribute on hustle plays and a few layups, but that’s her ceiling as I see it.

I liked Cowles leadership. On an early, poorly thrown post pass to her, she told the player to throw a bounce pass, and then was actively calling for the ball in the 4th. She wanted the ball, which is a good sign.

DeJesus gave a great defensive effort all night and protected the ball She’s really solid and strong for her height. If she can hit outside shots like she did last night consistently, we’ll be alright with her.

Sanchez has the height and moves fairly well, but I don’t see her as a 4 as a shooter, and she’s not ferocious. She is tall and doesn’t turn the ball over, but she’s got a long way to go as a player to be a meaningful force.

Hannah is great in the clutch. Awesome. She will always score. However, I’ll use a little Marcus Freeman language here: She doesn’t always win the interval. There were more than a few times last night when she had open players on the wing who, if given a good pass could have gone straight up and shot and hopefully scored, bu HH threw the ball at their feet where they had to reach low and that let the defense recover. I hope Ivey can be effective improving HH’s game, because she CAN get better.

Anyway, it was a good comeback win. ND has a great home crowd advantage and it was good to see the team reward the fans with the win.
 
Last edited:
ND Outlasts Central Michigan, 83-61; Heads into 10-Day Break Before Ole Miss Game

For me, this game underscores what ND fans/observers largely saw in (the better parts of) the U.S.C. game: this year's version of ND does best when they get the game chaotic (sloppy, back and forth, pick your poison). Last night, this is what transpired:
  • Points off Turnovers: ND 35 (20 in first half), CMU 10 (0 at half)
  • Pts. off Fast Breaks: ND 28 (14 each half), CMU 0
  • Pts. in Paint: ND 48 (28 in 1st half), CMU 18
  • Turnovers: ND 10, CMU 35

Hannah Hidalgo had 6 steals and Iyana Moore 5 to lead the Irish in the pilfer department. Now, Central Michigan just tossed a number of balls out, but ND had a lot to do with helping cause a remarkable 35 turnovers.

Offensively, Moore made a solid step forward, hitting 4-8 from three (that's all she shot) and Gisela Sanchez drilled 2-3. She may have the best form on the team.

Ole Miss, as this board knows, plays a very physical brand of ball. If ND can withstand the athletic nature of that team and keep the scrums static, improved three-point shooting will help. Big time.
 

Online statistics

Members online
302
Guests online
10,681
Total visitors
10,983

Forum statistics

Threads
165,400
Messages
4,435,640
Members
10,291
Latest member
RelentlessD


p
p
Top Bottom