Not a Top 5 Team - So What Are We? | The Boneyard

Not a Top 5 Team - So What Are We?

Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,219
Reaction Score
35,578
Heading into last week there was a hope and expectation that this truly was a special team, a Dream Season-like renaissance under Hurley that would catapult us back to permanent national relevance.

After Xavier I posed the question of whether this was:
A) a blip, we'd snap back to dominance and stay top 5 and #1-seed worthy wire to wire
B) a concerning trend (including mediocre performances in wins over Georgetown and Nova), but one we should recover from to still be top 10-ish and #2/3 seed
C) a reality check, that we played over our heads, caught teams off-guard, and peaked super early against some potentially overrated opponents (and looked better than we were by pushing leads from 10 to 20 in garbage time), but now we've been figured out and we're really the #15-25 type team people thought preseason

After last night, we can kiss A goodbye.

The good news is, by frontloading our dominant stretch, we're going to stay in the national conversation for at least a little while longer and maintain some buzz around the program. But that will wear off if we're looking like a clear #3 or worse in our own conference (sick to my stomach but feeling like a genius for putting a few bucks on Providence at 30:1 to win the BE and more on Xavier at 3.5:1).

So are we going to be B (a conference title and Final Four contender) or C (ranked but not really a threat in big games) ?
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,650
Reaction Score
99,007
Well, the talent is there to be a top 5 team. Us fans tend to look at our team more critically and gloss over shortcomings on other top teams.

But, it's clear coaching staffs have this team's early season tape and have made adjustments. Now, UConn's coaches have to figure out the counter to the counter.
 

ColchVEGAS

Still buckin like five, deuce, four, trey.
Joined
Apr 13, 2018
Messages
931
Reaction Score
3,118
The talent is there to be a top 5 team, the coaching staff just needs to make the proper adjustments. Sanogo is still not recognizing doubles, or is too stubborn to kick it out. Our guards are not getting in to the paint to draw fouls, except Diarra but he cannot hit free throws and due to his shooting woes teams will be backing off him like they do Jackson to prevent the penetration.

The offense in general has looked disorganized in conference play and the beautiful ball movement we saw earlier this year has disappeared.

It is really tough to win games when you are giving the opponent 20+ points at the free throw line. Not to mention it seems our entire team is slumping at the same time.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
13,384
Reaction Score
89,619
I'm not sure there's really enough of a difference between B and C for me to pick between the 2. Whichever group we fall in I think the expectation is still to make the Sweet 16 and anything less would be underachieving
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2022
Messages
2,380
Reaction Score
15,990
Maybe we’re a 5-10, 10-15, 15-20 etc team that just got hot early. Who knows? If so, I’m not too upset about it. We got quality wins, national attention in November, and a great buffer to lose some conference games and still get a good seed

In game adjustments need to be better, and we need to force opponents to play our game instead of trying to beat them at theirs. Do those two things + make a few more of our wide open threes and we’ll still win a lot more games than we lose. That’s what we did in Oregon and we blew out every single team we played. That can translate to solid wins against the BE giants
 

tykurez

For Your Health
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
2,877
Reaction Score
12,506
Until proven otherwise we’re decidedly (C) - it’s not just the two losses but the overall trend since Butler. I think there’s something to the fact that we exceeded expectations against inferior opponents or P5 teams that aren’t quite top-tier and had no good scouting data.

The Big East is full of really good coaches who will know how to give UConn fits now and it’s going to be on our coaching staff to start making adjustments quickly.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2011
Messages
5,047
Reaction Score
18,178
Until proven otherwise we’re decidedly (C) - it’s not just the two losses but the overall trend since Butler. I think there’s something to the fact that we exceeded expectations against inferior opponents or P5 teams that aren’t quite top-tier and had no good scouting data.

The Big East is full of really good coaches who will know how to give UConn fits now and it’s going to be on our coaching staff to start making adjustments quickly.
Spot on
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,219
Reaction Score
35,578
Until proven otherwise we’re decidedly (C) - it’s not just the two losses but the overall trend since Butler. I think there’s something to the fact that we exceeded expectations against inferior opponents or P5 teams that aren’t quite top-tier and had no good scouting data.

The Big East is full of really good coaches who will know how to give UConn fits now and it’s going to be on our coaching staff to start making adjustments quickly.
I agree, and I think it's less that the OOC teams were overrated (though, of those, only Bama and ISU are looking like true "quality wins") and more that they didn't know what to expect from a team that had a ton of roster turnover. Frankly, we as fans didn't either.

The coaching staff deserves a lot of credit for bringing in guys who were maybe better than advertised, getting them to gel quickly, and formulating an attack that caught teams by surprise.

Now they have to show they can counter, because -- whether due to more tape existing or BE coaches having a better feel for us than OOC foes -- we have been figured out for 4 games now.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2018
Messages
2,156
Reaction Score
6,826
We overreacted when the team was 14 and 0 and are doing the same thing now. The team is good and has so many pieces. Titles are not won and lost by January 5th. I would like to give the coach a chance to work this out. Conference play is different as we all tend to forget. They now have film to identify areas that need work. it's hard to find that when you are winning every game by double digits.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
2,089
Reaction Score
11,129
Heading into last week there was a hope and expectation that this truly was a special team, a Dream Season-like renaissance under Hurley that would catapult us back to permanent national relevance.

After Xavier I posed the question of whether this was:
A) a blip, we'd snap back to dominance and stay top 5 and #1-seed worthy wire to wire
B) a concerning trend (including mediocre performances in wins over Georgetown and Nova), but one we should recover from to still be top 10-ish and #2/3 seed
C) a reality check, that we played over our heads, caught teams off-guard, and peaked super early against some potentially overrated opponents (and looked better than we were by pushing leads from 10 to 20 in garbage time), but now we've been figured out and we're really the #15-25 type team people thought preseason

After last night, we can kiss A goodbye.

The good news is, by frontloading our dominant stretch, we're going to stay in the national conversation for at least a little while longer and maintain some buzz around the program. But that will wear off if we're looking like a clear #3 or worse in our own conference (sick to my stomach but feeling like a genius for putting a few bucks on Providence at 30:1 to win the BE and more on Xavier at 3.5:1).

So are we going to be B (a conference title and Final Four contender) or C (ranked but not really a threat in big games) ?
A — Top 5 team.

Look inside the numbers.

They lost games, yes, but the biggest issue is the team is getting too many fouls called agaisnt them. Stop fouling.

64 free throws in 2 games? Come on. That can’t be sustained by opponents.

They have also cratered from 3, even with wide open shots and are not being mentally tough enough about the officials perhaps giving Hurley the business.
 

Hans Sprungfeld

Undecided
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,018
Reaction Score
31,630
This thread identifies the team's next set of hurdles.

There is always one team that closes its season by winning 6 consecutive games against opponents who are faced with the same challenge.

Somebody does it.

I'm rattled but still feel like I can say, "Why not us?"

So much for the troll who made the call that it would be an undefeated season. May others lose interest, and may we who care hang tough and pull the sled together.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2019
Messages
1,598
Reaction Score
8,405
Don’t forget we won one of our titles after going 9-9 in conference play. Then we won 11 in a row. Point being- It’s not how you start, but how you finish. A lot of season is left and these losses will ultimately help make the team better for a deep run in March.
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
1,883
Reaction Score
5,820
It would be cool (sic) to see what Ed Cooley thinks of UConn after the game last night? He said we were "the best team in the country", before the game. He wouldn't be lying? :rolleyes: One of the friars might excommunicate him or something. :)
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2015
Messages
1,507
Reaction Score
9,135
They have also cratered from 3
Interesting idea

Hurley/ref/tech drama --> Team gets tight --> Miss open 3s --> Defenses can focus on 1 or 2 guys --> Offense gets harder

I tend to agree that if we can clean up one or two things we can turn it around quickly. At the end of the year we'll be closer to the team who played Bama than the team who played last night
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,765
Reaction Score
143,917
I'd say we're still a legit top 10 team. I think road games against ranked (Xavier) and soon-to-be-ranked (Providence) conference opponents are really tough. Those two games shouldn't erase what UConn did in the first 14. I also think Saturday's game against Creighton will be a better barometer for where this team is/may be headed.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2018
Messages
127
Reaction Score
681
It's a little too early to tell I suppose, but it appears to me that we are a live or die by the 3 type of team right now. If we are making outside shots we'll beat pretty much anybody by double digits since our defense is generally very good and takes care of the rest. When the jumpers are not falling, we struggle against any real competition. We don't have an alpha PG. Sanogo dominates lesser matchups, but struggles a bit against competent defenders and tends to force things too much. Unfortunately for us, these issues have been happening simultaneously in the last few games. Georgetown is luckily terrible enough that we still pulled that one out, but that won't work against the top half of the BE.

But as someone pointed out above, we've gone .500 in conference before and still won the whole damn thing and what we do know by what we've seen so far is that this team can go on a hot streak at any moment.
 

SwingDog

"THIS is the life you have"
Joined
Feb 25, 2017
Messages
767
Reaction Score
2,470
Well, the talent is there to be a top 5 team. Us fans tend to look at our team more critically and gloss over shortcomings on other top teams.

But, it's clear coaching staffs have this team's early season tape and have made adjustments. Now, UConn's coaches have to figure out the counter to the counter.
Bingo.
 

Online statistics

Members online
418
Guests online
2,720
Total visitors
3,138

Forum statistics

Threads
157,164
Messages
4,086,098
Members
9,982
Latest member
CJasmer


Top Bottom