Norlander write-up on Hurley/UConn | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Norlander write-up on Hurley/UConn

Norlander's probably mad because the media areas in the underbelly are old.

But the truth is that's where the major problems with the building lie. You all talk about how those areas don't affect you. Well, other than the media area, that's kind of where the entire heartbeat of the building is. That's all the critical systems.

Just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't shot.
 
Thank the CDRA for their management and move on to a competent organization.
 
I dont think its any secret that Hurley is not a fan of the XL Center. Coming from somebody outside the program like Hurley, Its probably a little wierd to have two home arenas and play less home games at your on campus arena. Thats one area where UConn stands out in a negative way compared to other blue bloods. Kansas is synonymous with Allen Field House, Kentucky/Rupp Arena, Duke/Cameron, UNC/Dean Dome. As fans, we have an idea who is on our schedule for the upcoming season, but we usually dont know exactly where the games will be played until the schedule comes out. It would not surprise me If Hurley has had conversations with Benedict about this issue going forward along with the whole practice issue.
 
I don’t get why he thinks UConn needs the XL to be renovated to be at the top of the AAC. The bowels of an arena have nothing to do with the players putting the ball in the hole and getting wins.
Its simple and people are trying to turn this into rocket science. UConn stinks because our talent level is terrible. Yes, TERRIBLE! Hopefully we are seeing a turn around with what we have coming in next season and seasons beyond.
 
Gampel is an amazing college basketball venue. Great atmosphere, not a bad seat in the house. Could it use some tweaks here and there? Sure. But, the XL Center and Gampel don’t even belong in the same conversation has to which is “better”
Agreed, I live 6 miles from the XL Center, yet I attend far more games at Gampel. Play some games at the XL when the students are on winter break. Other than that, all the home games should be at Gampel.
 
.-.
I love Gampel and usually only go to games there (as opposed to the XL). Recently a friend coerced me into an XL game. I hadn't been in years. Not sure why people call it a dump- it seemed the same as in years past to me.... I didn't use the restrooms, I didn't buy any food. What exactly is so dumpy about it?
 
I would not be a UConn fan had it not been for the XL Center. Not everyone is willing to drive up to Storrs, and I know many in the community believe that such an argument ("it's only 45 minutes away!") is just a lazy excuse, but Hartford is much more accessible than Storrs for a lot of people. I hope we make an effort to continue to play games there.

I think we can all agree that the Wolfpack are pointless.
 
Gampel is an amazing college basketball venue. Great atmosphere, not a bad seat in the house. Could it use some tweaks here and there? Sure. But, the XL Center and Gampel don’t even belong in the same conversation has to which is “better”
Gampel doesn’t have a bad seat in the house, correct. The arena is also dated however.

And atmosphere comes and goes with the team that’s on the court. We’ve had better crowds and rowdier atmospheres at XL vs. CCSU on a Tuesday afternoon in December than we did at Gampel when Yale, Northeastern, and Wagner beat us.
 
Gampel doesn’t have a bad seat in the house, correct. The arena is also dated however.

And atmosphere comes and goes with the team that’s on the court. We’ve had better crowds and rowdier atmospheres at XL vs. CCSU on a Tuesday afternoon in December than we did at Gampel when Yale, Northeastern, and Wagner beat us.
They both have their value. In the old days, XL was needed to handle the capacity for big games. Xl also makes UConn BB much more accessible to the state as a whole. Gampel provides the friendly “college” feel and better student access (although student presence is weak). Both are actually outdated, with the XL leading the way.
 
They both have their value. In the old days, XL was needed to handle the capacity for big games. Xl also makes UConn BB much more accessible to the state as a whole. Gampel provides the friendly “college” feel and better student access (although student presence is weak). Both are actually outdated, with the XL leading the way.

I get that, but it’s always important to note that the only reason games had to be played at the Civic Center to accommodate bigger crowds was because politicians kneecaped the on-campus arena project so that they’d be forced to keep playing games in Hartford.

Without going to into too much of my rant that y’all have already heard before, UConn needs to continue to try and break away from being viewed as Hartford’s pro sports team.
 
Gampel doesn’t have a bad seat in the house, correct. The arena is also dated however.

And atmosphere comes and goes with the team that’s on the court. We’ve had better crowds and rowdier atmospheres at XL vs. CCSU on a Tuesday afternoon in December than we did at Gampel when Yale, Northeastern, and Wagner beat us.

I actually happened to be at both that CCSU game and that Wagner game and this statement is simply incorrect.

However, I’m ok with playing the games in Hartford while the students are on break (as was the case for that CCSU game).
 
.-.
XL is big arena atmosphere and and vs a good opponent the crowd gets electric in there. The idea that it’s been holding back recruiting is ludicrous.

Does it hold back recruiting? Probably not.

Does it help recruiting? Uh, no.
 
Great atmosphere, not a bad seat in the house.

Nonsense, all of the bench seats suck, especially if you have an inseam over 28". The rows are jammed way too close together, going in and out is an ordeal.. Sitting in the middle of a Gampel row is torture. It's the kind place people that don't actually go to games think is great.
 
Last edited:
Nonsense, all of the bench seats suck, especially if you have an inseam over 28". The rows are jammed way to close together, going in and out is an ordeal.. Sitting in the middle of a Gampel row is torture. It's the kind place people that don't actually go to games think is great.

Bless your heart, you probably think that the new Yankee Stadium is a better baseball venue than Fenway or Wriegly.
 
It wasn't an issue but the program has also been run by Calhoun or the someone who played under Calhoun and accepted the way things are. I'd consider it preferable to have more access to the building.

This isn't the first time we've heard this come up since March. Hurley is challenging the status quo and probably doing it for the better.
Maybe the big tournament exposure will be the deciding factor on what and how the XL is used.
 
.-.
Thank the CDRA for their management and move on to a competent organization.
Chief en fuego today!!! Is there another shoe to drop or something negative coming to give us the terrible three some of events? KO. XL. ??
 
I actually happened to be at both that CCSU game and that Wagner game and this statement is simply incorrect.

However, I’m ok with playing the games in Hartford while the students are on break (as was the case for that CCSU game).
Nonsense, all of the bench seats suck, especially if you have an inseam over 28". The rows are jammed way to close together, going in and out is an ordeal.. Sitting in the middle of a Gampel row is torture. It's the kind place people that don't actually go to games think is great.
XL is a dump and Gampel is a slightly better dump. Gampel is a sad product of mid/late 1980’s arena architecture - there’s really nothing special about the place other than the fact it gets rowdy when we actually have a good team.
 
XL is a dump and Gampel is a slightly better dump. Gampel is a sad product of mid/late 1980’s arena architecture - there’s really nothing special about the place other than the fact it gets rowdy when we actually have a good team.

Yeah the 80’s were not a great time for architecture. But, at least we avoided the 90’s trend of designing venues around luxury boxes!

Generally speaking, though, I think it feels very intimate for an arena that sits over 10k and the roof is very interesting and unique; which are adjectives not used that much to describe 80’s architecture.

Gampel definitely needs wider/redone concourses and the seats themselves need to be better.
 
Yeah the 80’s were not a great time for architecture. But, at least we avoided the 90’s trend of designing venues around luxury boxes!

Generally speaking, though, I think it feels very intimate for an arena that sits over 10k and the roof is very interesting and unique; which are adjectives not used that much to describe 80’s architecture.

Gampel definitely needs wider/redone concourses and the seats themselves need to be better.
Come on, you don't like sitting on a bench?! Still kills me they spent millions of dollars to build the place but couldn't afford to spend just a little more to put in all seats. Sitting on those metal benches sucks.
 
Last edited:
Come on, you don't like sitting on a bench?! Still kills me they spent millions of dollars to build the place but couldn't afford to spend just a little more to put in all seats. Sitting on those metal benches sucks.
Surprised at the people calling Gampel a dump. I would think they designed Gampel with the benches because it would fit more people. I guarantee if they replaced all the benches with normal seating, the capacity would drop. Allen Field House has benches, I wonder how many Kansas fans complain about them?
 
.-.
Am I the only one here who manages to buy seats with backs?
 
Big D energy here
Side-to-side squeeze is one thing, but there is no room front to back. But it's only a problem if you go to games.
 
Surprised at the people calling Gampel a dump. I would think they designed Gampel with the benches because it would fit more people. I guarantee if they replaced all the benches with normal seating, the capacity would drop. Allen Field House has benches, I wonder how many Kansas fans complain about them?

Or the drive from KC...

I bet @HawkHusky has some thoughts
 
Keep both. Having 2 options Better than one. XL much more accessible from distance to parking to size of venue etc. perfect setup wud be to have 70% of games at gampel and 30% at XL. Everyone wins.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,336
Messages
4,565,483
Members
10,467
Latest member
Eil Rule


Top Bottom