ConnHuskBask
Shut Em Down!
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 9,110
- Reaction Score
- 33,724
@TruDomGopher you're kind of a madman, yet I strangely kind of like your style and I'm entertained by it.
I saw a UB hat here. I couldn't believe it.I live in New York. Outside of four years in Storrs, I have always lived in New York.
I have never met a Buffalo fan. I've never seen Buffalo sports mentioned in the local paper. I don't know of anyone who has gone, is going or will go to Buffalo.
They don't exist as an presence in most of the state. (As for their rebranding, good luck. SUNY has 64 campuses and not a one of them is close to being considered a flagship.)
To prove that their SEC myth-busting was no fluke, I could see Missouri looking for a new challenge.
You may be right--but Delany's still cute. And frugal, too. Apparently goes to Supercuts.
Winning a watered down SEC East two years in a row followed by a demolition in the title game didn't fully bust any myths IMO. Let's see them win The SEC or at least win a major New Year's Six Bowl Game before they start worrying about new challenges.
In reality much of their fan base has bought in to the whole S-E-C nonsense, and would be highly opposed to leaving for any conference, B1G included. With The SEC Network a reality, there really is no reason for them to go either. All of this is a moot point really, as it fail to address the most obvious question. Does The B1G actually want Missouri? The Tigers were doing everything short of prostituting themselves last go around, yet Delany still passed over them. What's changed?
You are incorrect. When you are that age you take it whenever you can get it. The future is now!Delany is, or will be, 67 this year. I don't think he cares about getting laid tonight, so "potential" it is.
On the GoR thing, they're not all made equal. The B1G has one, but doesn't need it. On the other hand, it's the only thing holding the ACC together. If the exit fee alone isn't enough to stop the ACC poaching, as years tick by, neither will the GoR.
Interesting, I've not seen that perspective but it sounds plausible.BTW, I thought I should add this: Sometimes things get shortened, as in, "The B1G blew off Mizzoo" or "The B1G didn't want Missouri." It's my understanding that Missouri and B1G actually had talks and Missouri balked hard at the idea of having to buy into the B1G Network and not getting full share right away. If I was looking from Missouri's perspective, the whole idea might have looked and smelled a little "Texas/Big12" to me, too. Remember, at that time, the whole network thing was new and had everyone a little befuddled. They seem happy enough now with the SEC, so who knows?
Dom, that's an entertaining but false analogy. CR isn't about finding one optimal partner it's about controlling the playing field. Think of the board game Risk rather than a school dance. Sometimes the strategy to world domination isn't to acquiring the biggest countries or continent. It is often preferable to take smaller but attractive targets to position yourself well for the future, and make your opponents current possessions more difficult to defend down the road. Connecticut does just that for the B1G. I'm sure Delaney is aware of it.To use a rather more crude metaphor: Delany at the dance eyeing that sweet young thing from Texas holding court with her suitors, all smiles in her tiara and billowing pink dress. So Delany asks for a dance and she just says, "Maybe the next dance, but not tonight." Delany approaches the Virginia dogwood queen and gets shot down. So Delany wanders over to the punch bowl and some girl from Connecticut wanders over and say, "You're cute. Listen, I know I might not be the prettiest girl here but if you dance with me you're gonna get laid tonight."
..................-I'm looking out my window toward Connecticut now and Warde's just standing in the kitchen window flipping off somebody--Bristol, Boston, not sure what direction that is...........
.
I think we agree. It not about the ideal target. It is about strategic acquisitions. The B1G has a presence in DC, and NYC. It will to strengthen and expand upon those footholds. That positions GOR free UConn well.CL82, I prefer to think of it as entertaining but grossly over-simplified. Delany has a strategy and he's been quite clear about what it is--I think Detroit Free Press posted a video of an interview about a week ago that essentially reiterated what he's been saying all along. The targets are the power centers that money flows through--NYC, DC--and "establishing a presence" which I take to mean implanting a B1G meme in the collective zeitgeist of those power centers. (In the crude analogy, there are lots of potential partners that would 'put out' but don't live in the right location.) The closer a school is to those power centers, the more attractive they are to the B1G.
That's why, all factors considered, I think the highest probability targets based on known factors now are UConn and VTech. But it always raises interesting questions: If Mizzoo wanted in now, do you take them, or do you wait for a higher priority that fits the strategic vision?
The longer you wait, the greater the probability of an unforeseen extraneous event. For example, what if Texas and Oklahoma called Delany tomorrow and said, "We want into the B1G--package deal. Take it or leave it." What would the B1G do? Personally, I would prefer Delany tell 'em to pound sound in that situation, but realistically that combo would probably be irresistible.
That's why I find it so interesting. Like my wife's mind, it's an endless puzzle.
Swofford made some shrewd moves? When exactly did that start?