- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
- Messages
- 2,814
- Reaction Score
- 9,569
Exactly. Monty has been saying Gonzaga to the Big12 is imminent for like a year now lol. He's full of hot air.Monty isn't reliable information. He's more shock value to get viewers.
Exactly. Monty has been saying Gonzaga to the Big12 is imminent for like a year now lol. He's full of hot air.Monty isn't reliable information. He's more shock value to get viewers.
Accretive is the governing word. Both for the conference and for the institution. If a move is not accretive for both, it won't happen.All about the money. If offered Duke goes
82,View attachment 98328
Well that's encouraging.
AlwaysDoomed
This list is based on Football, which of course will skew UConn negatively. This is a better indicator overall, where we can see UConn is the last P5-level G5 generator left
Well, if is ONLY based on FB, UConn would be a lot lower, don't you think?This list is based on Football, which of course will skew UConn negatively. This is a better indicator overall, where we can see UConn is the last P5-level G5 generator left
So after some digging it looks like the data comes from this tweet and basketball success is taken into account. The fact we are so high from Basketball alone is a great sign. With an OK team I'm assuming we would be ahead of the last G5s. We are not at our athletic department ceiling, the other guys are or are very closeWell, if is ONLY based on FB, UConn would be a lot lower, don't you think?
Also take a look at this. Obviously besides massive basketball revenue we are already spending as much as recent addition Houston and nearly as much as WVU, Cincy, OSU, and WazzuWell, if is ONLY based on FB, UConn would be a lot lower, don't you think?
So that is good to know. If UConn goes to a bowl and wins it this year they will make a jump in that particular ranking even though it would likely require several years to make a lot of improvement.So after some digging it looks like the data comes from this tweet and basketball success is taken into account. The fact we are so high from Basketball alone is a great sign. With an OK team I'm assuming we would be ahead of the last G5s. We are not at our athletic department ceiling, the other guys are or are very close
Well yeah, it could take time. My point was UConn already spends and generates more than any other G5. We are the only one left taking in 100M annually; the other G5s at this level all made the jump recently.So that is good to know. If UConn goes to a bowl and wins it this year they will make a jump in that particular ranking even though it would likely require several years to make a lot of improvement.
The only positive I get from this is that for as much as Rutgers spends on football, they suck (compared to their Px conference mates). If we could right shift to where Kentucky is on that graph, that may help a bit...but winning would help a lot more.Also take a look at this. Obviously besides massive basketball revenue we are already spending as much as recent addition Houston and nearly as much as WVU, Cincy, OSU, and Wazzu
More chatter recently about WSU/OSU resurrecting the PAC from the dead. Don’t know if they can pull it off, but interesting.
I don’t think we’d accept full membership in that mess anyway. That’s just the American all over again.Certainly fulfills rules #1 ... thus seems very likely.
More chatter recently about WSU/OSU resurrecting the PAC from the dead. Don’t know if they can pull it off, but interesting.
Am I reading that wrong, or does that say $50M or 50% of those revenues are a subsidy?Well yeah, it could take time. My point was UConn already spends and generates more than any other G5. We are the only one left taking in 100M annually; the other G5s at this level all made the jump recently.
We are already at the level to join the P5 financially with basketball alone
The website isn't very clear but regardless our "percent allocated" is less than Houston and about the same as UCF, and similar to other candidates USF and MemphisAm I reading that wrong, or does that say $50M or 50% of those revenues are a subsidy?
So time for the B12 / ACC to ask what can UConn do for them nationally for women’s basketball in a power conference.Iowa-LSU's average 12.3 million viewers are more than:
• Every women's college basketball game ever
• Every ESPN college basketball game ever
• Every MLB game last season
• Every NHL game last season
• Every MLS game last season
• Every NBA game last season except one
• Every CFB regular season game last season except one
[tweet via @frontofficesports]
Shows the power of the media when they have their mind set on somethingIowa-LSU's average 12.3 million viewers are more than:
• Every women's college basketball game ever
• Every ESPN college basketball game ever
• Every MLB game last season
• Every NHL game last season
• Every MLS game last season
• Every NBA game last season except one
• Every CFB regular season game last season except one
[tweet via @frontofficesports]