Wanna bet it’s announcing they’re changing their name?
Any guesses what it might be?
BAC. Big A** Conference
I can only watch a show if I don't know the outcome. Since I DVR all the sports I watch (to skip commercials, halftime, etc.), it sometimes gets tricky.Yeah. I could only rewatch a UConn game i missed. Anything else, even the super bowl i can't do it.
I usually watch in real time, but sometimes I watch with a 15 minute lag or so. Usually I'll avoid score updates that way and I can still skip through commercials.I can only watch a show if I don't know the outcome. Since I DVR all the sports I watch (to skip commercials, halftime, etc.), it sometimes gets tricky.
Is it necessary at this point? Wouldn't the optimal scenario be that more football brands go indy and we start to get scheduling benefits and normalization of that?
ACC does not work out with StanCal, would this work without damaging other conferences and bringing stability? 10 All Sports (Basketball), 12 Football
Pac12 (All or Football)
Stanford
Cal
Oregon State
Washington State
SDSU
Air Force
SMU
Memphis
USF
Gonzaga
UCONN (FB)
Navy (FB)
Army (FB)
By only taking 2 from MWC and 3 from AAC, they remain stable conferences. Having all 3 military schools for FB brings that tradition into a conference. Keeps the Core 4 still together, UConn stays in the BE, and a conference with solid Academics (outside of Memphis) to satisfy Stanford/Cal. The Core 4 will have the money to help buy out exit fees for those MWC & AAC with the upcoming PAC revenue that only goes to them. This conference would be solid with National Brands in both Basketball and Football. TV deal would be better than MWC & AAC and in multiple timezones for inventory.
I'm counting on this. We need this to be a major coming out party.Is it necessary at this point? Wouldn't the optimal scenario be that more football brands go indy and we start to get scheduling benefits and normalization of that?
Right now UConn is a punchline and the indy is seen as leaving the football program for dead. WHEN we are successful this season that punchline narrative will be left for dead and a few home and homes announced with cal and stanford will get people thinking.
Okay, then what does Stanford & Cal do for all their other sports? What about Oregon St & Washington St do as they prefer to stick with Stanford & Cal? I get your point of view of what would be optimal for UCONN football, but optimal may be harder to fall into place. Building something with other schools of worth has a solid chance to elevate instead of hoping the optimal happens.Is it necessary at this point? Wouldn't the optimal scenario be that more football brands go indy and we start to get scheduling benefits and normalization of that?
Right now UConn is a punchline and the indy is seen as leaving the football program for dead. WHEN we are successful this season that punchline narrative will be left for dead and a few home and homes announced with cal and stanford will get people thinking.
This is one of the annoying aspects of CR….
ACC does not work out with StanCal, would this work without damaging other conferences and bringing stability? 10 All Sports (Basketball), 12 Football
Pac12 (All or Football)
Stanford
Cal
Oregon State
Washington State
SDSU
Air Force
SMU
Memphis
USF
Gonzaga
UCONN (FB)
Navy (FB)
Army (FB)
By only taking 2 from MWC and 3 from AAC, they remain stable conferences. Having all 3 military schools for FB brings that tradition into a conference. Keeps the Core 4 still together, UConn stays in the BE, and a conference with solid Academics (outside of Memphis) to satisfy Stanford/Cal. The Core 4 will have the money to help buy out exit fees for those MWC & AAC with the upcoming PAC revenue that only goes to them. This conference would be solid with National Brands in both Basketball and Football. TV deal would be better than MWC & AAC and in multiple timezones for inventory.
My guess is they park them in either the Mountain West or WCC. Or 2 in each.Okay, then what does Stanford & Cal do for all their other sports? What about Oregon St & Washington St do as they prefer to stick with Stanford & Cal? I get your point of view of what would be optimal for UCONN football, but optimal may be harder to fall into place. Building something with other schools of worth has a solid chance to elevate instead of hoping the optimal happens.
Can someone explain the supposed appeal of the service academies? I don't think they would want them.
ACC does not work out with StanCal, would this work without damaging other conferences and bringing stability? 10 All Sports (Basketball), 12 Football
Pac12 (All or Football)
Stanford
Cal
Oregon State
Washington State
SDSU
Air Force
SMU
Memphis
USF
Gonzaga
UCONN (FB)
Navy (FB)
Army (FB)
By only taking 2 from MWC and 3 from AAC, they remain stable conferences. Having all 3 military schools for FB brings that tradition into a conference. Keeps the Core 4 still together, UConn stays in the BE, and a conference with solid Academics (outside of Memphis) to satisfy Stanford/Cal. The Core 4 will have the money to help buy out exit fees for those MWC & AAC with the upcoming PAC revenue that only goes to them. This conference would be solid with National Brands in both Basketball and Football. TV deal would be better than MWC & AAC and in multiple timezones for inventory.
I think the service academies have a pretty broad audience. I'm just guessing, but I'd say Navy does better in ratings, than say, Temple.Can someone explain the supposed appeal of the service academies? I don't think they would want them.
Sure. But they aren't really competitive. Army is worse.I think the service academies have a pretty broad audience. I'm just guessing, but I'd say Navy does better in ratings, than say, Temple.
I think the PAC-4 wants to keep whatever money and the PAC-12 name. They probably will stay there and invite schools that make the most sense vs. merging with the AAC and/or MWC. They just need to have 8 to maintain a conference. I do think UCONN should look into a FB only with the PAC-4 if there is such an option. Ultimately, I do think the PAC-4 will want to build something close to the West for their other sports. For football, their best option is to do a national conference with some football-only schools if they want schools like UCONN in it.Okay, then what does Stanford & Cal do for all their other sports? What about Oregon St & Washington St do as they prefer to stick with Stanford & Cal? I get your point of view of what would be optimal for UCONN football, but optimal may be harder to fall into place. Building something with other schools of worth has a solid chance to elevate instead of hoping the optimal happens.
UConn would be a natural fit but other schools, like SMU, would have a very hard time joining.I think the PAC-4 wants to keep whatever money and the PAC-12 name. They probably will stay there and invite schools that make the most sense vs. merging with the AAC and/or MWC. They just need to have 8 to maintain a conference. I do think UCONN should look into a FB only with the PAC-4 if there is such an option. Ultimately, I do think the PAC-4 will want to build something close to the West for their other sports. For football, their best option is to do a national conference with some football-only schools if they want schools like UCONN in it.
Why?UConn would be a natural fit but other schools, like SMU, would have a very hard time joining.
Aside from many Americans generally supportive of our military, no surprise many football fans highly respect the USNA and each of the academies. The pageantry of Commander in Chief games. Additionally, many, certainly not all, Navy active duty and veterans support for Midshipmen football. Enlisted, and academy grads alike.Can someone explain the supposed appeal of the service academies?
because we're already in a non-football paying conferenceWhy?
If the future is football only conferences we might as well get started.because we're already in a non-football paying conference